MM has laid his stall out15 May 2023 09:58
Some thoughts on this one
Tbf to MM he’s laid out his position clearly - Linked in post last week
‘PE firms usually want majority ownership. We’ve been clear: don’t bid if you want 51%, plan to use debt to leverage up, or won’t allow existing shareholders to stay invested. This rebuffs most PE firms’
So if a PE firm wants to have a recommendation - from the THG BoD - to the 35% that the offer works for them PE knows they can’t have preference shares that rank higher than existing and they can’t control the BoD and they can’t load with debt
So at £2 a share that’s £1B of investment by PE but not control
I can’t see how any PE would put invest that sum of money on the terms above? PE like control and squeeze costs to get their targeted 20% p/a
I fully understand the THG BoD position btw, why should they carry the risk of losing control so the 35% get their £cash
So unless Qatar crew play ball then PE looks unlikely to Bid for the quoted shares
We then go back to Ingenuity which requires the £135M intangible capex a year, spinning this off and selling 50% to fund and they can get £1B valuation then why not , de risk keep control of the PLC, invest and grow Beauty / Nutrition, repay the existing debt, save £60M a year all at the same time, works for everyone ,seems logical to me