Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
So hence b/p we are not looking at what the market says - but what the MMs say - right? And I have no doubt they have a slightly different agenda.
In addition: Where is transparency?
e.g. I have tried to buy and others have been able to place and execute their orders at the same price and with the same amount. WTF?
I still don't understand where the surplus shares (sells/buys) end up (every
sale requires a buy and vice versa). That still appears to be the big mystery that the MMs would rather not disclose.
NYSE and Nasdaq provide more transparency!
A raise is probably one of the options for PM. If chosen, I hope it's the best one in the share holders interest.
However, once all systems are go, there are certainly other financing options which MB will have checked before he selects the raise option.
ARTH123: I hope you had time now to reconsider the content of your post @07.59.
You seem to be a mature AIM investor - so why would you need to use the words "dirty" and "sad"?
Looks like we've got another frustrated PI on our hands - what a pity.
And btw: I don't believe this "BB is full of dodgy LTH's who would do absolutely anything to get the SP to rise".
I am an LTH.
leaks and rumours and whatever results in a sp rise. don't get me wrong: i love those blue numbers - we haven't been seeing those very often.
i'd just like to see the reasoning for the rise - there have been hints but no proof so far. so let's not get too ****y just yet.
atb to all.
B/p said:
"Is this share getting more ridiculous than ever - more than twice as many comment(s!) as trades - what a crock of sheet!" (post of yesterday @22.03).
It appears that "ridiculous" shares attract a heck of a lot posters - who don't realize that they themselves are actually more ridiculous than the share.