Oops this is actually a ramp now
Sorry
New price target?
Called it right years ago
I am not in previous margins. as they are built into the share price.
My question was on the margins for the new contract.
I cant find reference to margin disclosure, only a reference confirming non-disclosure of margins as below
How the financial spoils are divided remain to be seen, and we would like to see more details on contract margin which has been an issue in recent times.
https://www.sharecast.com/amp/news/news-and-announcements/petrofac-secures-largest-ever-framework-agreement-shares-surge--12846672.html
??
What's your reference for the Hitachi contract margins Tony!
Classic Cineworld ramping here
The never say die, ignore all the evidence, mindset.
Why stop at 5p when you could dial up your ramp to £1?
#moonshot
some good points money sponge.
just one question why have you posted variations of the same messages several times over the past few days?
For example is debt is being discussed then the only contributions should be on that or directly related to that.
As compared to a discussion on margins including comments disclosed open short positions or sustainability.
I.e. just stay roughly on topic.
there are around 1/2 a dozen users that post most of the content on here, im sure the balance would go along with the groups view.
Could we make a rule that only content related to a thread is discussed in that thread?
great post Rag
welcome back.
what was the reference for this?
T4G
this is why this type of behaviour misrepresents the users position & in my view it should be banned, or disclosures should be made as to being long short out and investment timeframe.
I think you will find that the traders all perceive an exteneded bull run on Boohoo stock adding securtity to investment, but they also perceive a lot fo future volatility.
How the traders are handled these to elements is to come on to this invest,ment forum and SPAM negative information about Boohoo over a prolonged period of time whilst they get in and out of the stock.
The behaviour massively misrepresents the users true underlying position on being bullish on the stock, which many will not pick up from a post in isolation, and creates a false narrative.
I will bever understand how people could have held this share.
I predicted an institutional placement 2 years ago, with Mooky getting a golden parachute as part of the deal.
Multiple users thought this was market abuse. The mind boggles.
Its been truely astonishing to way the LTH have stubbornly ignore the truth for ages, a facinating expose in human behaviour.
They can't the SP isn't high enough either they turn a profit or go bust
Where is that referenced
great!
this user has been added to my filter list for acting like a fool most of the time its getting old
Johnhulme
some interesting questions
on the bonus for the fat cats I dont mind it. huge Mcap required.
my only concern on this it that a rights issue issue is used to fabricte the market cap
although the specified share price of £3.95 would suggest other wise i guess
I am also no in favour of increasing the cost base
ref share purchased the business may have just been waiting for analyst changes in sentiment before gettting the share to create an appreciating assets. but i am not firm on this view.
Holders were told hundreds of times
God knows why anyone held this stock
It's a real mystery