The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
I believe Oreol did some work on IG Copper.
MadMat,
I totally agree and I'm sure this will be a defining year.
WG,
That heading made me laugh. Good to see you're still about.
Thanks for the in depth replies RL.
RL,
I was wondering what makes you think KM is unviable as the Pfs suggests otherwise?
Also, what other reasons could RY be going back to analysing UG more? Ie is it possible that an interested party has preferred this route?
I will be contacting the Nomad regards this date.
If their own submission target for the Teo has changed they should say so imo.
Imo it's a market sensitive issue.
Thanks, see what you mean now.
Whats your point?
etank,
Thanks for your reply. The trouble with reading the BB as a measure of dissatisfaction is that generally speaking people will put the effort in to moan/complain but those that are satisfied quite often don't bother.
Then you get the murky areas of those with agendas which can muddy the waters further.
If you actually count the names rather than the number of posts from those who are dissatisfied its actually not that many. It's largely just daily repetition and it's when that repetition overfills the bucket that I feel the need to counter it as it can become counter productive imo.
MD,
I have included the addition of Tom Bowens and departure of Brian Savage and Randolph Lewis.
Just stating the facts as you say. Not sugar coating but not making a mountain out of a mole hill either.
For anyone interested.
MD,
Getting rid of deadwood and replacing with more dynamic people could be seen as a plus?
Re the TEO, if you take what they said at face value then COVID may have interfered with the promised timelines.
My personal view is that it was likely due partly to COVID but also a potential offtaker wanting to have an input into the TEO since they came onto the scene. Making sure it fits everyones needs.
etank,
Some of the team are relatively new and seem to be providing a good input. As for no credibility, well that is an opinion you are entitled to but rest assured it is not one that lots of others share.
Also its worth considering that us BB users/shareholders will only represent a small percentage of those interested in investing in AMC if they cross some further milestones. These new investors won't be particularly concerned about how much we lth have had to endure.
Just to add for anyone who gets disgruntled that AMC does not deliver an RNS that is expected then a good place to start maybe to give the NOMAD a nudge. It might help.
Hi MD I agree about the AGM Rns. I had forgotten about that further announcement in due course line in it.
But, its not a biggie for me either way as the AMC site has been updated to reflect the Habib position change back to President. As for the votes, well its clear a number of shareholders (be it in concert or simply collectively) wanted to rock the boat. Personally I take that as a positive sign that someone out there has an interest in AMC.
What makes you think "No nickel in those"?
What exactly are you expecting the BOD to do other than deliver the TEO within this quarter?
If you watch the videos and read the RNS's you should be able to grasp what the strategy is.
Other than the strategy the aims and ambitions of the company are laid out on the website and should be relatively self explanatory imo.
Is it not a moment of further patience that is required? A daily update of change or even weekly or perhaps you could say even monthly update is not a realistic expectation for this type of investment.
£7. I wish lol
How do you expect the bod to change that? Or are you just another problem finder with no alternative solutions. Have the bod not run this like a junior mining exploration company since you invested? If not then in what way have they veered off their remit?
If you have seen nothing then may I suggest you open your eyes.