Member Info for NoelShempsky

"perhaps you think Hansard spreads conspiracy theories" - sorry bankrupty, that was for kkkrrr

"fake news" means "stop telling the truth" - quite right, and the term "conspiracy theory" was coined to put people off listening to truthers. Do you remember when anyone who even mentioned the Bilderberg Group was a "conspiracy theorist", because it didn't exist, the MSM said. Well now they report the meetings, but they say it's only a meeting of politicians and business leaders - nothing sinister about it. So why did they deny it?

They only admitted it's existence after the "conspiracy theorist" Alex Jones proved it existed, so it couldn't be denied. Then there was Hunter Biden's laptop.

I could list many more -Slapton Sands - covered up - denied for years, but now admitted. In the 196os the British government carried out secret chemical weapons and biological weapons tests on the British public - it was denied for decades, but now you can read in Hansard, Oliver Letwin speaking in the House of Commons, apologising on behalf of the government for doing it. It was true but denied, but perhaps you think Hansard spreads conspiracy theories. Denied but true - conspiracy theorists proved right.

"Please no fake-news articles ... kingworldnews is fake news " Well, I did begin with a note of caution.

I would agree that for many years, KWN has been trumpetting the "Big rise" soon message and it's forecasts never come true, but you won't find better analysis of the world's financial system and economic conditions than the articles on KWN by Alasdair Macleod and James Turk.

I repeat - Knowing of how KWN is full of exaggeration and sensationalist headlines, I usually ignore it, but lets hope it's different this time and that these two are right - but perhaps you don't want to hope that they are right.

Knowing of how KWN is full of exaggeration and sensationalist headlines, I usually ignore it, but lets hope it's different this time and that these two are right -

"SPROTT: The Gold Bull Market May Finally Be Unleashed!"

https://kingworldnews.com/sprott-the-gold-bull-market-may-finally-be-unleashed/

"$4,821 Price Target For Gold And Look At This Collapse No One Is Talking About"

"the final result is a gold price of just under USD 2,500 at the end of 2024""

https://kingworldnews.com/4821-price-target-for-gold-and-look-at-this-collapse-no-one-is-talking-about/

Off topic - See at 20m 19s. Incredible. You wouldn't believe this was possible. You won't get any better entertainment today or even this month. - "The Good Old Days - 29-03-1979"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEeHc2RbIGs

EU NatGas Spikes Again, This Time On Report Europe's Largest Gas Field Set To Close

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/eu-natgas-spikes-again-time-report-europes-largest-gas-field-set-close

Beechknot - it's a total hoax -

"They are lying to you; fossil fuel emissions do not cause global warming".

https://expose-news.com/2023/06/10/fossil-fuel-emissions-do-not-cause-global-warming/

"New UN Report on Climate Change – Absolutely Nothing in This Report Is True".

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/09/un-report-on-climate-change-nothing-is-true/

"Media lies about Antarctic ice shelf collapsing; the mass has actually gained more ice than it lost".

https://climatealarmism.news/2022-03-31-media-lies-about-antarctic-ice-shelf-collapsing.html

A competitor to AZ - the MHRA has just authorised a new Covid vaccine - SKYCovion.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/skycovion-covid-19-vaccine-authorised-by-mhra

They've authorised it, but they don't know if it works, they don't know if it causes cancer, they don't know if it is safe for pregnant women and they don't know if it affects fertility or reproduction in humans because that was only tested on rats - see their words below in the official Product Information sheet.

A link on that MHRA page leads to this -

"Summary of Product Characteristics for COVID-19 Vaccine SKYCovion"

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1159556/Skycovion_spc-doc.pdf

- "SKYCovion may not protect all vaccine recipients. Efficacy was not evaluated as part of the clinical trial programme" - my understanding of this - they don't know if it works.

- "Neither genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies were performed. The components of the vaccine are not expected to have genotoxic potential." My understanding of this - they don't know if it causes cancer. Not expected! Life is full of things that are not expected, but then they happen.

- "Reproductive and developmental toxicity study was conducted to evaluate the effect of SKYCovion on pregnant or lactating female Sprague-Dawley rats" - my understanding of this - only tested on rats, so they don't know if it is safe for pregnant women, they don't know if it affects fertility or reproduction in humans.

Those extracts are from the government's own website - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1159556/Skycovion_spc-doc.pdf"

I expect the MSM to soon report this new vaccine, if they haven't already.

When you read about this new new vaccine in the MSM, or hear about it on the BBC, compare what they tell you to what is in that official document.

"The Good Old Days - 29-03-1979"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEeHc2RbIGs

See at 20m 19s. Incredible. You wouldn't believe this was possible. You won't get any better entertainment today or even this month.

I need to correct what I said - they didn't "approve" it, they authorised it for use.

I hope you all are well-informed enough to understand the difference and understand the implications of that difference.

Here is something that you will be reading about soon, very soon.

Admittedly it is not about DELT, but we have had chat about health issues.

The MHRA has just approved a new Covid vaccine - SKYCovion, by a company that has close ties to Bill Gates.

They've approved it but they don't know if it works, they don't know if it causes cancer, they don't know if it is safe for pregnant women and they don't know if it affects fertility or reproduction in humans because that was only tested on rats - see their words below.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/skycovion-covid-19-vaccine-authorised-by-mhra

Here is what the MSM won't tell you, and I found this in the MHRA's own documents - a link on that MHRA page leads to this -

"Summary of Product Characteristics for COVID-19 Vaccine SKYCovion"

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1159556/Skycovion_spc-doc.pdf

- "SKYCovion may not protect all vaccine recipients. Efficacy was not evaluated as part of the clinical trial programme" - my understanding of this - they don't know if it works.

- "Neither genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies were performed. The components of the vaccine are not expected to have genotoxic potential." Not expected! Life is full of things that are not expected, but then they happen. My understanding of this - they don't know if it causes cancer.

- "Reproductive and developmental toxicity study was conducted to evaluate the effect of SKYCovion on pregnant or lactating female Sprague-Dawley rats" - my understanding of this - they don't know if it is safe for pregnant women, they don't know if it affects fertility or reproduction in humans.

Those extracts are from the government's own website - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1159556/Skycovion_spc-doc.pdf"

Note that I back up things I say with facts. With me, you get facts and evidence.

The Expose has reported on the ties between the MHRA and Bill Gates (excellent investigative journalism) - he gives a lot of funding to the MHRA. Does that old saying, "He who pays the piper calls the tune" come into this?

When you read about this new new vaccine in the MSM, or hear about it on the BBC, compare what they tell you to what I have said and make up your mind.

"Shell To Raise Dividend By 15% As It Doubles Down On Oil And Gas"

the UK-based oil and gas supermajor pledged on Wednesday to grow its gas business and extend its position in the upstream.

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/shell-raise-dividend-15-it-doubles-down-oil-and-gas

If anyone is bored or offended by my posts, please use the filter, that's what it's there for.

Good posts dickupham

If I can find the time I'll extend this topic to the Dutch and Irish farmers - and that links to DELT because it is about methane.

This is the video of the father with a son who has breathing difficulties (jump to 4m 56s) but he opposes the enlargement of the ULEZ - and this is just one man's story. There are many, many more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwuPgJrbbk0

I hate diesel pollution and would support measures to reduce deadly diesel fumes, but here we see the fraud behind the action.

"The ULEZ supercar scam: Fury as millionaires' motors that pump out tons of CO2 are EXEMPT from hated green scheme".

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/cars/article-12094625/How-supercar-owners-dodge-Ulez-charge-despite-massive-CO2-emissions.html

"Is it part of a big conspiracy? As much I like to always keep an open mind, very doubtful in my view" - the term conspiracy theory was dreamed up to use to put people off looking into the facts.

I can give you a long list of "conspiracy theories" that turned out to be true - now officially admitted, but denied for many years or even decades.

This is bigger than just Oxford.

"As much I like to always keep an open mind" - do you really? "If you are not taking the mickey" - in spite of all I've said you have the nerve to say that. A comment like that would not come from an open mind.

Testing to see why my reply gets censored - I'm trying to find a video I saw a couple of months ago -- an interview with a man who has a son with severe breathing difficulties, so obviously he wants clean air. He tells of how these restrictions have made his life so much harder and harder to care for his son. He has a lot to say on the sort of issues people are facing. You don't seem to care about people who are affected.

"have been done by elected local politicians, voluntarily elected by the people of Oxford" - did the people know what they were voting for? No. See in that video above, many people in Oxford were ignorant of the plans. Many still are. This is one of the points in other articles I posted, it is being done by stealth or deception, for example, they have meetings where local people can voice their objections - but see the use of "facilitators", highly trained psychologists, to control the discussion and direct the outcome to be in favour of the plans.

"Shops may well have concerns about footfall, these schemes may push traffic to surrounding roads, issues around data collection (invasion of privacy risks). These are valid issues and should be managed" - concerns? They might close and people lose their businesses, but you don't seem to care. "These are valid issues and should be managed" - what does that mean?

Testing to see why my reply gets censored - "The mainstream media continues to ignore the dystopian nightmare that is the 15-minute city. Or if they do mention it, they frame it as a "conspiracy theory" — you know how it is.

You will be pleased to know that the people I spoke to about 15-minute cities are starting to take it seriously. I was pleasantly surprised by how well our Oxford video did and how many people began to question the mainstream narrative for the first time.

https://www.rebelnews.com/oxford_protest?utm_campaign=cs_15mincities_05_15_2023&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

Momentum is shifting, and the pendulum is swinging to the side of common sense."

Testing to see why my reply gets censored - "Massive Protest in Oxford Against 15-Minute Cities"

Yet another shameful tactic from Razza - a misquote to create a wrong impression.

I said " when you've lost the argument \ debate and can't talk about the facts, resort to insults and abuse.

People who do that think they are being clever, but all it does is prove that you've lost the argument or debate and I take pleasure in knowing that you know you've lost"

In a court of law a witness has to swear to tell the truth, the WHOLE TRUTH and nothing but the truth.

The law makes that demand about the WHOLE TRUTh because it knows that omission can put a slant on a story - which is Razza's intention here. Razza proves himself to be a liar - lying by omission.