Member Info for NoelShempsky

To all of you who are genuine private investors and enjoy talking about the numbers- do carry on, but I am right about swamping as a cover up tactic by people who are not genuine.

They make it look as though they have in depth knowledge, but all they are doing is merely churning out the numbers from RNS's and the company's own data.

Last week there were days with no posts at all, then after I posted that link to the Ed Dowd interview- wow - what a burst of posts analyising the figures in such depth that I am surprised that they failed to mention how many tins of cat food per week the mine manager's cat eats.

Then when I reported the Ed Dowd link - lo and behold -another burst and this isn't the first time I've seen it happen. It is a tactic they use quite often.

If you are a genuine private investor who likes to talk about the numbers, just take a few seconds to wonder if the others are genuine too.

What is?

Denials - as would be expected. When Harold Shipman was first questioned, he denied any wrongdoing.

"Are you going to keep reposting this every few hours?" - ask them if they are going to keep posting all that hot air and drivel.

Just look at all those posts. Don't they have a lot to say, don't they have such a deep knowledge of every single aspect of SHG. Wow, such expertise, with such analytical skills they must be mulit-millionaires.

A question to all genuine private investors - can you see what is going on? It's ramping by organised gangs.

This board rarely get so many posts, and last week there were even days with no posts at all, but as soon as a post appears that goes against the ramping agenda, suddenly the board gets many posts and many long-winded posts - and the reason why - to swamp the board in order to bury the one they don't like.

The pattern is clear, you've been rumbled.

Dvharrison - my post that you might have missed - "This is on its way to 9p and possibly even under 9p - and that is before the huge crash that Ed Dowd talks about - Ed Dowd - top fund manager - ex-BlackRock -made billions because he does his homework. In that interview he gives all the reasons that led him to his conclusion - all backed up by reliable data such as from insurance companies and the UK official statistics., and who knows more about using statistics to spot trends than insurance companies - no one.

At 24 mins he says - being in the market now is a mug's game, get into cash and soon you will be buying your favourite stocks dirt cheap.

In the interview prior to that comment, he explains how his forecasts lead to that conclusion - forecasts based on his analysis of official statistics (including UK gov't data) and what is going on in the world. This man has a fine track record - I am not going to dismiss his words lightly.

https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-vax-is-a-crime-coverup-ed-dowd/

Some good news. It seems that there are people in Conservative Party (actually the party that used to be Conservative) putting pressure on Sunak to scrap some of the mad Net Zero plans.

He is caught between a rock and hard place - will he listen to them or will he obey his master, Klaus Schwab?

"Things are not looking good for UK’s Net Zero Zealots and offshore wind profiteers"

https://expose-news.com/2023/08/10/things-are-not-looking-good-for-uks-net-zero-zealots/

By the way, as this article reveals, possibly the biggest wind profiteers is King Charles - he owns the wind that blows over the seas around of this country - along half of the coastline.

But even though there are those in the Conservative Party urging slippery Sunak to backtrack, there are still many eco-nu_tt_ers in the Tories - Goldsmith threatens to leave if slippery Sunak doesn't step up the madness (it is madness. This morning I caught only the last two minutes of Farming Today, but it seems that the green issue is causing problems for many farmers in Scotland - forcing them off the land) -

"Tory ex-minister Zac Goldsmith claims he's 'very tempted' to switch his support to Labour as he takes a fresh swipe at Rishi Sunak over climate change action"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12389555/Tory-ex-minister-Zac-Goldsmith-claims-hes-tempted-switch-support-Labour-takes-fresh-swipe-Rishi-Sunak-climate-change-action.html

"but Dr, P clearly has" - should have been - but Dr. P clearly hasn't.

Dvharrison - my post that you might have missed - "This is on its way to 9p and possibly even under 9p - and that is before the huge crash that Ed Dowd talks about - Ed Dowd - top fund manager - ex-BlackRock -made billions because he does his homework. In that interview he gives all the reasons that led him to his conclusion - all backed up by reliable data such as from insurance companies and the UK official statistics., and who knows more about using statistics to spot trends than insurance companies - no one.

At 24 mins he says - being in the market now is a mug's game, get into cash and soon you will be buying your favourite stocks dirt cheap.

In the interview prior to that comment, he explains how his forecasts lead to that conclusion - forecasts based on his analysis of official statistics (including UK gov't data) and what is going on in the world. This man has a fine track record - I am not going to dismiss his words lightly.

https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-vax-is-a-crime-coverup-ed-dowd/

"Surely not heading back down sub 9p?" - didn't you read my posts? You possibly didn't, because this board is being swamped with a load of theoretical claptrap that pretends to be analysis. Look at the tone in their posts. "Oh, aren't they so knowledgeable, they know everything don't they" - except which way the sp is going.

Purdey should change his name to perjury - as that fits for someone who fails to tell the whole truth.

"Purdey quotes me - "I didn't want to go on and on about this topic, " - in court, witness have to swear an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Note - the whole truth. The legal system recognises that by omitting part of a story, you can put a slant on on it, it is misrepresentation.

Purdey missed off the "but" part of my post. I hadn't wanted to go on, but I had a good reason for doing so.

So he misrepresented my words. He didn't like my posts, but he couldn't simply ignore them, skip over them or use the filter, he had to say something but he couldn't make a fair and honest post, he gives a misrepresentation of what what was posted. That indicates a small minded person, one of the puerile citizenry blindly subservient to the tricks and treats disbursed by an elite corporate and political class - in simple terms, one of the sheeple.

"Let me repeat: "...WE WON'T REVOKE ANY LICENCES...". Pretty clear, again" - well let me repeat the tale of Cameron and the IF Campaign and Cameron and care home fees.

Let me repeat what was on the R4 Today programme last week when the BBC said about a Sunak broken promise - he had said that he would move heaven and Earth to make it happen - but it DIDN'T happen.

There is a huge difference between what politicians say and what they do, but you have never noticed - why not?

"Noel, crucial piece of info" - you said you had filtered me. I forget your actual phrase -something like - filter, then so be it.

Sunak said HE was granting over 100 new licences. Not true. The NSTA will be granting them.

Sunak said he was granting over 100 NEW licences. Not true. They are ones we already knew about. Last year the NSTA said that they would be granting over licences in the 33rd Round - last year! If they had granted them on time, i.e. in Q2 as they said they would, then Sunak woudl have had nothing to talk about, unless he is granting another 100 licences in addition to those from the NSTA, which I doubt.

So you noticed Sunak's truth avoidance.

Avoidance - no, it was deception and bluff. It was to grab votes from those who think we should have energy security - but it was all talk.

It was "Tell them what they want to hear" - Lenin - and then you you just fail to act on your words.

I can't be the only person who

N oticed S unak's T ruth A voidance

- but Dr, P clearly has - "The Tories stopping the 33rd licensing round (clearly not the case, ref recent Sunak speech)"

"WK project has no impact in Shanta current stock price because buried gold value is 0 because it produces 0. " - perhaps it dosen't but it should.

Reserves and resources are part of the valuation of a mining company. Back in the days when gold stocks used to actually go up in price (pre 2011) an increase in resources would send the sp up, but see my 15:42 post - there is a plot against gold stocks.

Hey Ratso, the Electoral Commission has had to call in cyber security experts - do you think they even looked at FCS?

The market couldn't give fig for the dividend. The sp has dropped and is dropping.

I agree with you about the possibility of a decent increase in the dividend. Surely the market must then take notice and the sp will go up - you'd think so wouldn't you, but I am not so sure.

I don't recall if I posted it, but I recently read some article that told of how fund managers are told to not invest in oil and gas companies and I think there is the same anti-gold stocks attitude. It's more than an attitude. It links to how the banks are closing people's bank accounts because of their personal views.

Too many are "woke" and are letting their woke views impinge on business.

I hope they suffer the consequences as Bud Light did.

When did you Ratty? You stinking rat.

"China Buys 23 Tons Of Gold In 9th Straight Month Of Purchases, Total Rises To Record 2,137 Tons"

... and the gold price goes down.

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/china-buys-23-tons-gold-9th-straight-month-purchases-total-rises-record-2137-tons