Member Info for NoelShempsky

Regarding my "sometimes harsh tone " - yes, I give straight talk, good honest plain speaking and a lot of people can't take bluntness.

There are people in world facing bullets and bombs and Dr. P runs away from words. Look on YouTube at those Kurdish and Yazidi women fighting ISIS - women facing bullets and bombs and not running away.

" I don't think folk want to get drawn into a discussion on if agencies are lying about things like the hottest day" - there is no 'if' about it.

The US gov't's own satellite data proves they lied and you can see the temperature charts for yourself on their NOAA web site. I think I posted the link.

This is relevant to DELT, and not just to DELT but to the whole country on the point of energy security and power cuts. NS gas exploration is dependent on government policy and it appears that gov't policy is being influenced by lies. The public are being influenced by lies about the hottest month - will they use the public consultation to say no to new exploration?

Anyone who puts their head in the sand about this issue is allowing the eco-mobs to rule their lives.

Do you have any views on the public consultation - did the NSTA announce it at the time they announced the 33rd Round? If not why has it suddenly sprung up now? What will happen if the public says no? The public are being influenced by lies about the hottest month.

It is all relevant to DELT.

Regarding a public consultation - I think that what I said makes sense, but I am open to comments from anyone who can see where my thinking is wrong.

Think about this - had the NSTA previously (i.e. when they announced the start of the process of the 33rd Round) said that there would be a public consultation?

If anyone knows that the answer is yes they did, then you need read no further, please post a link to where they said it and then I can let this matter drop.

Why are they having a public consultation?

Do they need to get permission from the public for granting the licences for new gas and oil exploration? Sunak seemed definite with his talk of over 100 new licences. If he said that they were conditional on a public consultation, i missed that in the news reports.

However, a few days ago I heard on the R4 Today programme about another promise of Sunak's that he sound definite about. He had said he would move heaven and Earth to make it happen. That's sounds pretty definite. Guess what, it didn't happen.

What if the result of the consultation is that the public say no to new exploration - will the NSTA (or is it Sunak, there's a mystery there) ignore their views and say, "Well you are having it anyway"?

If they do that, then what is the point of the consultation?

Over the last twenty years, I have noticed many examples of promises made by politicians that turned out to be all hot air, all talk but no action. You must have noticed them too, but I hope I am wrong to be so suspicious and that this public consultation is in reality a PR exercise to persuade the public of the benefits of new exploration. The "consultation" bit is bluff, it is just to tell them, "Look, this is what we are doing and here's why you should welcome it".

I must point out the way Dr. P picked up on Klaus Schwab but avoid all talk about the actions of the NSTA - saying they would announce the awards of new licences in Q2 but now holding a public consultation and my point about it could be the excuse Sunak wants. Dr. P didn't want to debate that did he? I wonder why not - and of course the answer is obvious.

If Sunak backtracks and cancels the new licences, thus proving me right in my opinion, will Dr. P have the grace to apologise. I doubt it.

I simply skip over posts that bore me, but he posts a scolding and insulting one telling me to shut up - showing his true character. A person like that won't apologise, even to someone who is proved right.

Debate it if you wish, all I said is you are wasting your time.

I didn't tell you to stop talking about it - but you tell me to stop posting.

and as for "conspiracy and fake news" - the articles I post have links to back up what the say with facts - look at today's post - link to NOAA - the US Govt's climate monitoring agency and their temperature charts (from their own satellites) prove the media is lying about the hottest month.

So you are calling the US government's NOAA conspiracy theorists who write fake news.

Other articles have links to UK gov't pages and other official sites such as the UN and the WEF's own web site - so that i wrote about Klaus Schwab is verified and can't be denied - they say what their plans are but the media won't report it.

You have pretended to be a reasonable sort of chap, mild mannered and open to debate, but your last post with its insulting and scolding tone reveals your true character.

"Leading authors threaten to boycott top Edinburgh book festival because of a sponsor's ties to fossil fuel firms

Some of the writers appearing at this year's Edinburgh Book Festival have signed a letter demanding the firm backing the event, Baillie Gifford, divest from fossil fuel corporations"

On its own this isn't going to bring the NS oil and gas industry to and end, but it is just one more ... I can't think of the expression I seek - camel's back and straws, bricks building houses, little acorns ... no, neither of them.

This one will have to do - A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step.

Following that link that Richdam provided, I read this - " It was concluded that further assessment (AA) was required for 96 of the Blocks applied for".

Okay, but why hold up the others? They could have granted the others.

Excuses, excuses, excuses, just as Slippery Sunak wants so that he can break his promise and say, "Not my fault, I wanted new licences but they wouldn't let me. Boo hoo, sob, sob".

Hey Ratso, the Electoral Commission has had to call in cyber security experts - do you think they even looked at FCS?

If you had listened to me about FLX, then wouldn't have lost the price of a small car. The same goes for holders of CNR and QFI, who I warned but most didn't listen and so lost money.

If you had followed my advice on ECK, HOC and PGM you would have made good money.

I believe PGM has changed its name and now something like PC? - Phoenix Copper, I think.

So you continue making your smug remarks and I will continue making correct forecasts for share prices.

There will be NO new licences.

Just Stop Oil and Greenpeace have won.

If you think Just Stop oil is simply a load of workshy lay-abouts looking to cause trouble because they have nothing better to do, then you are wrong.

They have seriously powerful agents behind them. The ones who actually go out and protest are the useful idiots who have been recruited by very determined plotters. They recruit the idiots by telling them that are saving the planet. Isn't that nice, we all love the planet - that is the honey that entices them.

But they don't tell them of the real reason why they have put so much money into setting up JSO, and its real purpose.

"SotB, thanks and a very interesting angle, which is worth keeping an eye on.

As No 2, I have not fully looked into this, but at a glance I also feel it looks like tax offsets/allowances, which would reduce tax bills going forward. They could probably raise cash agsinst it though?!"

Do you really think that will help you to forecast the sp - which is why we are here - to make money.

Don't waste your time. Just wait for the company to make announcements. You can't work out more than the company knows or the City analysts know.

Quote - "Regarding the Licensing of blocks in the 33rd round. As I understand it there is still a period of public consultation going on. "

So if there is a period of public consultation going on now, why did they previously say that they would be awarding the new licences in Q2 of this year?

Are you telling me that at the time they said they would grant them in Q2, they were also planning a public consultation at a later date?

In my view this proves me right - all we get is bluff - and what do you think the result of the public consultation will be - "DON'T ISSUE ANY NEW LICENCES!"

That gives Sunak the excuse to back track. It will be yet another broken promise from Sunak.

Remember what I said - Cameron used a similar trick with the IF Campaign.

Slippery Sunak is looking for an excuse to NOT grant licences - it was just vote-grabbing bluff. He will scrap them and say "It's not my fault. It's what the public want".

Sunak will never disobey his master - Klaus Schwab.

As shareholders in DELT, our propects are being harmed by lies. (See below for the truth that cannot be denied - the actual temperature data from NOAA - The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - US Gov't agency)

Where is the law when all NS oil and gas companies are being attacked with vicious lies?

The latest lie from the mad eco-zealots is that July was the hottest month EVER recorded on Earth.

The media repeats the lie, but at least some report the truth.

"Is It Time To Fact-Check Corporate Media's 'Climate Hysteria' Over "Hottest Day Ever"?"

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/it-time-fact-check-corporate-medias-climate-hysteria-over-hottest-day-ever

"Even NOAA "Runs Away" From 'Hottest Day Ever' Claim After Media Hysteria "

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/even-noaa-runs-away-hottest-day-ever-claim-after-media-hysteria

Here is the Wall street Journal -

"Hottest Days Ever? Don’t Believe It

‘Average global temperature’ is a meaningless measure, and comparisons to 125,000 years ago are preposterous."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/hottest-days-ever-dont-believe-it-global-temperature-north-sole-poles-6e64a991

This includes the NOAA data and has a link to the temperature charts on the NOAA site so you can see for yourself -

"Biden Administration launches “HeatTracker” tool for tracking heat-related illnesses"

https://expose-news.com/2023/08/12/biden-launches-heattracker-for-heat-related-illnesses/

Also in that article - "A Lancet study in July 2022 reported that from 2000 to 2019 in England and Wales there were an average of 791 heat-related excess deaths and 60,753 cold-related excess deaths each year. That’s an excess death ratio of about 85 to 1 for cold temperatures."

The hottest month ever? Really? Here, a geologist tells of the history of Earth's climate, as revealed by ice cores and other evidence. "I don’t have opinions I have demonstrable facts,” he said." This article - "Green Murder: We have a crisis but it’s not a climate crisis".

https://expose-news.com/2023/07/04/green-murder-we-have-a-crisis-but-its-not-a-climate-crisis/

... and the AML board was the same. I don't recall the peak in AML but I think it was around £17 a share.

I dropped to 500p.

Oh, that board was full of "analysis" that proved that fall was over done and the sp was going to recover. They spewed out all the figures that proved they were right. They spoke with such authority.

I'm sure you all know about AML. What did the sp drop to?

By the way, for anyone who takes a look, they had a consolidation so make sure you take that into account.

Bankrupty - yes, Greg Hunter gets a little over excited, but Ed Dowd seems like a sane, level headed chap and he has used the same analytical methods that he has used in the past to make billions of dollars.

Thanks for you post bankrupty. I rate you as one of the genuine ones.

However, exactly the same thing happened when I posted a link to a Martin Armstrong video - they used the same tactic, plus one of them was very abusive.

All that analysis is a waste of time. Do you think you can work out anything that the analysts in the City don't know?

It doesn't help you to predict the sp - and that is what matters. We are here to make money.

Let me tell you about Condor Gold.

Yesrs ago when it was at 53p, the CNR board was full of similar posts - in depth analysis of the figures that showed that the sp should have been much hogher.

Oh, they spoke with such authority, they knew everything. With such financial expertise they must have been mulit-millionaires - and if not - why not?

I looked at the chart and said the sp was going to drop to 42p.

They ramped up the posts with more anaylsis that "proved" that sp couldn't drop that far. Plus of course I got a load of mockery, insults and abuse.

The sp dropped to 42p.

I looked again at the chart. I posted that the sp was in for a big fall.

I got more insults and abuse.

The sp dropped to 15p.

The sp spent years under 20p and all the time that cNR board was ful of the same sort of "analysis" as we get on here, saying why sp should be much higher.

Not one of them apologised to me, not one of them admitted that I had been right about the sp and they carried on with abuse and even posted things like "Noel knows nothing", "Noel has never made a corect forecast".

They aren't genuine, they are plotters, rampers, crooks.

On 5th August I posted - "Any bets on 15p by the end of next week?"

It has just hit 19p. Can it get to 15p by the end of the day?

This - "Then when I reported the Ed Dowd link" - should have been - "Then when I reposted the Ed Dowd link"