Member Info for NoelShempsky

Part 2

You have nothing to say about Matt Hanc0ck's WhatsApp message that proved we were lied to.

What about the authorities who lied about Ivermectin? Said it was horse worming tablets and dangerous for humans. Have you seen the news from the last few days - the FDA has now authorised doctors to prescribe it for treating Covid - they admit it is safe. It always was safe. It was, and is on the WHO's list of the 10 most essential medicines. You fell for the lies from the authorities and rejected the truth from truthers.

You don't face up the things that show that so called conspiracy theorists tell the truth.

Your attitude was described by Soren Kierkegaard - “There are two ways to be fooled: one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”

I didn't want to make more than one posting in reply, but my message was rejected, so I am splitting it into three parts to see if that will let get through.

Part 1 -

I didn't say the page looked genuine, I said the URL was genuine - .gov.uk - they can't fake that.

You are only showing your lack of knowledge about the internet, so your comment to me about being on guard for fake sites was ultracrepidarian.

I notice you didn't comment on the links I gave to the Wall Street Journal or NOAA. Are you afraid to call them conspiracy theorists?

What about a Nobel prize winning scientist, is he a conspiracy theorist?

The hoax exposed by a Nobel Prize-winning physicist -

"Nobel Prize winner denounces alarmist climate predictions: ‘I don’t believe there is a climate crisis" - Dr. John Clauser.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/nobel-prize-winner-denounces-alarmist-climate-predictions-i-dont-believe-there-is-a-climate-crisis/

Peskov addresses the Western press and says that tomorrow the Russian president will show something important in Sochi; all journalists are invited to the event. “You will see and understand everything yourselves,” Peskov tells the reporters. Journalists arrive in Sochi, Putin comes out to them and walks on water. He makes a circle, silently looks at everyone and leaves.

The next morning, British newspapers wrote: “Putin can’t swim.”

I meant - "Was there collusion".

Thank you for saying thank you No.2.

I must admit that I don't fully deserve it as what has happened is trivial, but thanks anyway.

"what's your thoughts on why the share price dropped yesterday and has recovered strongly today?" - I've no idea. Your explanation is probably the best we'll get.

There is one company that I watch. I'm not invested though. A while ago, the sp took a big dive, I think it was over 25% in one day and a bit more the next. The day after the company issued an update and sp rocketed. Was their collusion to knock the price down so that those in the know could buy on the cheap? We'll never know, but the market can be very dodgy. I'm not suggesting anything like in the case of DELT yesterday and day.

I've just been reading a House of Commons Environment Audit Committee Special Report, March 2023.

It has some encouraging words that go some way to ease my concerns, however it has some wording that doesn't.

"We therefore recommend that the UK set a clear date for ending new oil and gas licensing rounds in the North Sea: this date should fall well before 2050. We further recommend the Government should consult on what this date should be, based on the oil and gas production currently being planned by the UK and other producer states and on the remaining global carbon budget if temperatures are to be limited to 1.5°C."

Note - "the remaining global carbon budget" - something they could use as an excuse to back track, but perhaps I'm being too pessimistic.

"The fossil fuel industry should not be granted headroom in the UK’s carbon budgets that other hard to decarbonise sectors may need. We recommend that the North Sea Transition Deal be modified to include stronger targets and verification arrangements in line with the Government’s commitments under the Paris Agreement."

"stronger targets" - ?

Will we get new licences?

Here is a headline in the news "Net Zero Secretary Grant Shapps's office targeted by eco-activists with Tory MPs now put on high alert for infiltration by green campaigners".

What did I say and what did someone else say when they dismissed a protest at a cycle race as meaningless?

Yet again I get proved right.

The eco mobs have more power than you know about. There are powerful forces supporting them.

Anyone who wants to take the head in the sand attitude, then do so, but don't tell me to do so to.

I did say that I would continue to talk about this topic because it directly affects DELT - it is RELEVANT.

Correction - "if it did".

We are all hoping that DELT will win new licences.

The other day I posted - "Think about this - had the NSTA previously (i.e. when they announced the start of the process of the 33rd Round) said that there would be a public consultation?

If anyone knows that the answer is yes they did, then you need read no further, please post a link to where they said it and then I can let this matter drop."

No one has posted a link, so I presume that the NSTA hadn't previously said there would be a public consultation - it has been conjured up only recently.

To me, this backs up what I say - Sunak is looking for an excuse to backtrack on his pledge. He doesn't want new licences. It was all bluff - vote-grabbing bluff.

When they changed the name of the NS Oil & Gas Authority to the NSTA, that signalled that the mission of the NSO&GA had changed from being one of promoting NS oil and gas, to one of ending NS oil and gas.

I now fear that they might even revoke existing licenses. DELT could end up with no assets (IMHO) and what does that mean for the value of the company?

Please note - that last point is an extreme view, but considering the seriousness of what it would do to our investments if if did happen, then it is worthy of debate. There is a wise old saying - Never Say Never!

P.S. - denial of facts and using shameful tactics such as telling me that I had followed a fake link. They are desperate for anything to use to suppress truth.

Their attitude was described by Soren Kierkegaard - “There are two ways to be fooled: one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”

I didn't want to go on about all of this but I will not let those who provoke me get away with their denial of facts and solid evidence - i.e. truth.

Blame them.

I will let it drop when they do - the more general stuff that is - but I will continue to talk about the political opposition to new licences, i.e the green eco-mobs, as it has a direct effect on the prospects for DELT.

"from what I have seen, those links are not trustworthy" - you should be ashamed of that comment.

You are telling me that I am in idiot.

I check the URLs. (do you know what URL means?)

The link I followed went to a .gov.uk web site - a genuine gov't site.

Conspiracy theory - oh yes? The BBC has been caught out lying many times. I don't have time to type out many examples but here is one. In the pandemic, we were told that a new variant in India was even more deadly, Delta I think, and the lying BBC showed people dying in the street. It was actually footage of the Bhopal disaster when thousands of people did die after a huge chemical cloud was released from the Union Carbide chemical works.

If you want conspiracy theorists who pump out fake mews, go to the BBC.

What about Matt Hanc 0 ck's WhatsApp messages - they proved that we were lied to, but the BBC never reported anything that was revealed by his messages. Al they talked about was the motivation of the woman who leaked them - it was a cover up of truth and a character assassination of a truther.

D.r P. made a mocking comment about Klaus Schwab. I told of what happened in the Dutch parliament when the Dutch PM lied to cover up his links to Schwab. He was caught out when a letter from the archives was produced, - undeniable proof. You choose to ignore all of the facts I have presented.

I didn't want to go on about all of this but you and others provoked me. Blame yourself, you won't let it drop.

REPLY TO LET IT DROP.

I will let it drop when they do.

I expect this to happen here - that there will be a legal challenge to new licences. The green eco-mobs probably have lawyers preparing the case right now.

"Judge sides with activists in landmark climate change trial: State of Montana violated kids' rights by ignoring global warming, court rules"

"A judge has ruled in favor of youths who claimed Montana's use of fossil fuels contributed to the climate crisis and harmed their health.

The 'monumental decision' was based on the state's policy in evaluating requests for fossil fuel permits - which does not allow agencies to assess the effects of greenhouse gas emissions - was found unconstitutional.

The youths, aged five to 22, did not seek a payout following a win but wanted defendants to 'bring the state energy system into constitutional compliance."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12406105/Judge-sides-activists-world-climate-change-trial-State-Montana-violated-kids-rights-ignoring-global-warming-court-rules.html

Last week I said "All that analysis is a waste of time".

What I was trying to say was - price action is what really matters. Fundamentals are just a narrative.

Oh look, that just happens to be the headline on an investing article - "Price action is what really matters. Fundamentals are just a narrative." So a financial journalist backs up what I say - proves me right.

Good news - "The European Energy Crisis May Be Back Soon"

https://www.dlacalle.com/en/the-european-energy-crisis-may-be-back-soon

It is good news because the Greenpeace \ JSO mobs with their anti-licences campaign seem to be in the lead when it comes to public opinion, so this news might swing the balance the other way. It will give more backing to those in the (used to be) Conservative Party who want more oil and gas as they put pressure on slippery Sunak.

Exactly - you dodged mentioning sites that cannot be denied have facts - official data, satellite data - proof.

and by the way, I am critical of some articles on The Expose. Yes, some opinion pieces sort of stretch things a bit - but they do some fine investigative journalism and apart from the odd one two as just mentioned their articles have links to back up what they say with facts for readers to check for themselves.

I followed one of their links to the UK ONS death figures and even though I had read the article and knew what to expect, seeing it there in the ONS data shocked me. The media isn't telling you what is happening. Note how Prof. Norman Fenton has been cancelled - a highly respected man with a fine career history, the BBC used to have him on, but now cancelled for telling the truth. Why - think about it.

Info please.

I have talked about lying media and about mobs - on the subject of both -

I don't watch television. I'm sure I didn't hear this mentioned on BBC radio. Could anyone tell me if this was shown on the BBC television news - the mobs in Oxford street, and shocking pictures they are.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/civil-unrest/london-riots/

So you fully expect new licences to be announced by the end of September. I hope you are right - but NS gas exploration is dependent on government policy and it appears that gov't policy is being influenced by lies. The public are being influenced by lies about the hottest month - will they use the public consultation to say no to new exploration?

Anyone who puts their head in the sand about this issue is allowing the eco-mobs to rule their lives.

So Dr P didn't like my posts - he thinks my posts are madness.

Are they? Think about this -

How many of you were in DELT back in the days when it was called CLNR and it had two arms to the business - NS gas and on-shore CBM in Scotland?

In one day half of the business was wiped out and the share price lost over 50%.

Do you see the connection between then and now? Do you see what I warn about?

If I am right, and there is plenty of evidence to show that I could be, this time it will be a 100% loss, but none of you want to talk about that. You just want to talk about how everything in the garden is rosy, it's all going to turn out all right and we are going to make money.

"Global warming is a reality" - let me correct you - climate change is a reality - yes it is and I posted a link to an article about a 10 million year-old fossil that shows how the climate has changed over millions of years. Ice cores also prove it. The climate changes, but it is caused by the sun - and there are many scientists who say that we are heading for a period of global cooling - but you won't know about that.

Yoo also won't know about a letter signed by about 10,000 scientists that was sent to the UN Climate Committee telling them that man-made global warming is a myth. The media that lies about a "hottest month" didn't tell you about that letter because that doesn't suit their agenda.

Why do you pick on the Expose but ignore the other sites, such as NOAA?