Member Info for NoelShempsky

I need to point out that, on these boards, when you post there is an "Opinion box" that has "Sell", "Weak Sell" and "Strong Sell" as three of the options.

These boards are not reserved purely for the opinion that a price will go up. You are allowed to offer an opinion that it might fall, and they even provide a facility (that opinion box) to put a little flag next to your post to express a negative outlook.

Share prices can go down as well as up. Grow up and live with it.

No.2 said - "Noel - we have all given you time to tame it down , you don't and there are 8 of us who are sick of your chattering nonsense. It's not that you're negative it's that you don't chill out, you always have to make the statement about being right, again and again"

Firstly - 8 of them - just because they have formed a gang, does that give them the right to say what people may or may not say on this board. They are a gang of bullies. If they weren't attacking me I wouldn't need to post so much. When eight of them each post an attack on me, I need to post eight times to defend myself against their false accusations and misrepresentation of my words.

It's they who are disrupting the board.

Secondly on being right. The reason why I need to point out when events prove me right with my forecasts or opinions is because I am constantly attacked with misrepresentations of my words. They can't stand it that I was right and they were wrong so they post false accusations and denial - even though my posts are still there they have the nerve to carry on making false accusations. They are brazen.

Look at how SouthEast18 has misrepresented my opinion on granting new licences.

On 1st August I wrote - "Will the NSTA ever announce the 33rd Rounds awards? I think they probably will" - so, I my opinion is that they probably will - but SouthEast18 keeps saying that I said they won't.

He will not acknowledge that post of mine. He misrepresents other things I said as if that negates my clearly stated opinion on the matter.

That is what I am up against and why I have to post evidence to defend myself.

I said that Sunak might backtrack on his pledge to grant new gas drilling licences. Note - "might".

On 1st August I said that I thought they probably will grant new licences, but we don't know. There are plenty of examples of broken promises, so I think there is a chance that he will backtrack. No one can see the future and in dozens of posts I have said "I might be wrong" and "in my opinion" - it is just an opinion thank you.

However here is yet more evidence to back up what I said - more backtracking on a pledge -

Red Wall rebels force Downing Street to drop potential 'game-changer' plan to axe inheritance tax

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526847/Red-Wall-rebels-force-Downing-Street-drop-potential-game-changer-plan-axe-inheritance-tax.html

I said "in my opinion" - it is just an opinion - but an opinion based on evidence - informed opinion.

I said that Sunak might backtrack on his pledge to grant new gas drilling licences. Note - "might".

On 1st August I said that I thought they probably will grant new licences, but we don't know. There are plenty of examples of broken promises, so I think there is a chance that he will backtrack. No one can see the future and in dozens of posts I have said "I might be wrong" and "in my opinion" - it is just an opinion thank you.

However here is yet more evidence to back up what I said - more backtracking on a pledge -

Red Wall rebels force Downing Street to drop potential 'game-changer' plan to axe inheritance tax

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526847/Red-Wall-rebels-force-Downing-Street-drop-potential-game-changer-plan-axe-inheritance-tax.html

I said "in my opinion" - it is just an opinion - but an opinion based on evidence - informed opinion.

If you lot weren't attacking me I wouldn't need to post so much. When five of you each post an attack on me, I need to post five times to defend myself against your false accusations and misrepresentation of my words.

It's you lot who are disrupting the board.

You lot are ridiculous, If I posted things like "this will double in a month", "triple in two months" "big rise soon" then you would all be clicking on "Recommend" and cheering me, posting replies like "Well said" - for unrealistic forecasts.

I post realistic forecasts, which turned out to be correct, and I get attacked.

Then you carry on attacking me relentlessly, and when I defend myself, you accuse ME of disrupting the board.

If you weren't attacking me I woudn't need to post so much.

Dr. P said something about conspiracy theory - was he referring to Ed Dowd who made a forecast of a stock market crash?

Listen to what Dowd had to say - the evidence, from official gov't figures that led him to his conclusion - and keep an eye on the news, because things are happening that back him up.

He said the economy is suffering because of the big jump in workers going off sick and in disability claims.

Last week a man escaped from Wandsworth prison and on the Today programme a goverment minsiter sadi the prison was suffering from a high rate of absence due to sickness. In the news today - airport chaos caused by lots of air traffic controllers being off sick, and they are just two examples. There are others. Dowd is being proved right - what Dr. P calls conspiracy theory is fact not theory.

You are being given warnings which you may choose to ignore, it's your choice, but to attack me just for passing on information is stupid.

It makes me think of the OceanGate Titan. You lot would have sneered at the warnings and fallen for someone telling you that it is safe, nothing to worry about, talk of danger is just a conspiracy theory.

I'm back on the topic of new gas exploration licences (i.e. DELT's business).

More evidence to back up what I've said.

I have said that the eco-mobs such as Just Stop Oil aren't just a few youngsters out to cause trouble and annoy motorists. They have serious political clout and here is proof.

"Just Stop Oil eco-protesters to attend hard Left event alongside Labour Party Conference discussing 'radical solutions' to climate change amid row over disruptive group's financial links with Sir Keir Starmer"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12517995/Just-Stop-Oil-eco-protesters-Corbynista-event-alongside-Labour-Party-Conference-discussing-radical-solutions-climate-change-amid-row-disruptive-groups-financial-links-Sir-Keir-Starmer.html

Note - "group's financial links with Sir Keir Starmer" - he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Don't forget the Conservative Party is just the same, so don't think there is any left \ right politics here. It Globalist tyrants against the people.

In Labour and Conservative, the MPs know that if they oppose the green agenda, then their political career will suffer, so they tow the line.

However, I was pleased the see that union leader speak out. Hopefully he can gain support and form a force to push back against the mad plans of the warmists, but he is up against powerful forces,

In case you missed it -

"Union boss Gary Smith dismisses Labour's green energy policy as 'impossible' and says the Left has been 'hoodwinked' into backing renewables"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12515711/Union-boss-Gary-Smith-dismisses-Labours-green-energy-policy-impossible-says-Left-hoodwinked-backing-renewables.html

Could Sunak not only fail to grant new licences, but also cancel existing ones?

I think it is unlikely (got that SE18), but it cannot be disregarded as a possibility - wise old saying "Never say never" (got that SE18).

Why do I raise this point? Because it is happening in America, and what happens there happens here.

See this -

"Biden announced he was canceling all drilling on Federal land in Alaska and termination existing permits"

"Is it even legal for the Biden Administration to cancel previously issues leases?"

They are from this article -

"What is Biden Doing in Alaska?".

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/what-is-biden-doing-in-alaska/

It ends with "They can only blame Russia and climate change for so long until the masses wake up" - but dolts like Dr. P will never wake up because of their bigotry and refusal to accept facts.

Dizzy wrote - "I certainly don't appreciate reading your Bile every day" - every day ? - look back over the last week - I don't post every day - so grow up you oaf.

and as for "bile" - I don't post bile, I merely defend myself against the false accusations and misrepresentations of others. Do you think I not allowed to defend myself?

If you want to see bile, look at your own post you opinionated hypocrite.

A post in two parts, part 1 - "how on earth could I have come to the conclusion that you said there would be NO new licences" - because, SE18 - you are not seeking truth, you are simply looking to push your vendetta against me.

On the 1st August I said they probably WILL award new licences - why do you not acknowledge that post of mine? The answer is because you are not seeking truth, you wish only to spew out your false accusations against me.

Anyone reading my posts, and you read them all, would have seen the dozens of them where I said "I might be wrong", "In my opinion" and such like. I think it was on 12th August when I wrote "IF Sunak grants new licences" - see that IF - so no expression of certainty from me. It's about balance of probabilities. I had said I might be wrong. I had said it in the vast majority of my posts and so it does not need to be said every time. Anyone can see that when I said "There will be NO new licences. Just Stop Oil and Greenpeace have won" it was just to point out that the balance of probabilities might be tipping towards the green lobby winning.

I take it Dizzy, that you enjoy reading their attacks on me - and they do it just because I was right.

When the DELT sp as at 4p (pre-consolidation) I looked at the chart and saw that it was going to drop to 3.2p. I said so on here and I got a lot of abuse for saying that.

It dropped to 3.2p

i looked again at the chart and saw that it was going to 2.3p. Again, I said so and got a lot of abuse. It dropped to 2.3p.

They want only posts that predict the sp going up. They don't want realistic posts, and probably don't either.

It's about to begin - will Sunak use this as the excuse to backtrack on his pledge to grant new licences? He will say "I wanted to grant licences but people don't want them. It's not my fault." - as Cameron did over foreign aid.

"Just Stop Oil's plot to paralyse London for a whole WEEK unmasked: Militant eco-clowns are planning to cripple the capital by 'radicalising' and recruiting more than 500 students

- Just Stop Oil members will teach the youngsters how to break the law"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12522027/Just-Stop-Oils-plot-paralyse-London-planning-recruiting-500-students.html

"in that article - has says" - should have been "in that article - he says".

See also in that article - has says about renewable energy - "impossible", "not feasible" and "It cannot be done" - but our treacherous rulers are intent on pressing on regardless - because it isn't about energy, it is part of a bigger plan. The Great Reset.

We do need oil and gas (and coal), but Sunak doesn't want us to have them. He doesn't care if we have blackouts and power cuts, but he is walkng a tightrope - he has to implement Klaus Schwab's plan but he can't push it too quickly or the masses will wake up, as this union leader has done, and there will be pushback, so he might be forced to grant new exploration licences. On 1st August I said they probably will, but only "probably" - there is a chance they won't becue the green lobby is bigger than this union leader.

Also in that article - it says, Tony Blair had promised but not delivered - another one like Sunak, Cameron and the others - promises but not delivered. Broken promises. Never trust our leaders, they tell people what they want to hear, but they have no intention of delivering.

I had better say, before SouthEast18 uses that to make false accusations and misrepresent my words - that last post isn't me saying that there will be no more licences, I was merely pointing out what Starmer wants.

NO MORE GAS DRILLING LICENCES !

"Labour leader Sir Keir has said that he wants a net-zero carbon electricity system by 2030, along with no more licences for North Sea oil and gas drilling."

that is in this article -

"Union boss Gary Smith dismisses Labour's green energy policy as 'impossible' and says the Left has been 'hoodwinked' into backing renewables"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12515711/Union-boss-Gary-Smith-dismisses-Labours-green-energy-policy-impossible-says-Left-hoodwinked-backing-renewables.html

I'm amazed - a sensible union leader.

Anyone who bought in the last six months was a mug for not heeding my words.

At 2p, the chart was shouting 1p. Don't listen to the endless cheerleading from the rampers on here.

This is on its way back to 15p.

Just to remind you, when this was at 53p, I said it would drop to 42p or 43p. It did.

At 42p I said it was heading for another fall. It dropped to 15p.

Of course I got a lot of abuse. They don't want any chat other than the "Big rise soon" sort of thing. When it was at 53p and I made the forecast of 42p, ISAPENSION was the most offensive and nasty one on here. He had predicted 60p I made him look a right fool so he resorted to insults and abuse.

I don't need to do that sort of thing. The sp proves me right.

Down by nearly 12% - the FCS sp does as I said it would. I've been on this board for many years (and before that when it was FLX). FallingKnife1 has never been wrong with his forecasts for the sp.

A tip - take heed of people who have a track record of being right not newcomers who come on ramping.

Well, all that ramping pushed the sp up a bit, but as usual, the spike has now ended. the FCS sp performs as I said it would.