Member Info for NoelShempsky

A while ago, in a debate with DrPatience (who has no patience) he countered my post about Net Zero plans \ 15 minute cities, etc, by saying that people were getting what they voted for.

I knew then that he was wrong. It is being done in secret, or as secretly as they can possibly get away with.

"The astonishing thing about the net zero target is that it was nodded through Parliament in the dying days of Theresa May's government without a vote, an impact statement, any idea of what it would cost or even whether it could be achieved at all in an advanced industrial country" - see - done in secret.

This is from this article - "ROSS CLARK: There's one net zero deadline that's fast approaching which Rishi Sunak didn't mention. And it should seriously worry all of us".

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12547243/ROSS-CLARK-net-zero-deadline-approaching-Sunak-didnt-mention.html

You get common sense and facts from me, and bluff and ignorance from Dr. P.

Did Lord Spencer talk about this?

What did I say - a balancing act - "Mr Sunak said he expected his plans to 'command very broad support, not just in our party but in the country'.

But ministers could face a tougher challenge in the Lords, where the Government does not have a majority.

The Tory benches in the Lords contain a number of committed environmental campaigners who have criticised Mr Sunak's plans, including former environment minister Zac Goldsmith and former climate change committee chairman Lord Deben."

That is from this article - "Tory rebels could block Rishi Sunak's plan to delay the ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars in parliament"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12547009/Tory-rebels-Rishi-Sunaks-delay-ban-sale-new-petrol-diesel-cars-parliament.html

Yet again I am proved right.

I'm proved right - again. I said - A spike that fizzles out.

This was predictable,but not for those wearing rose-tinted specs. By the way, the cost will be far greater than £15,000. £45,000 is more like it, and that is at present day prices.

"Environmentalist plot legal challenge to Rishi Sunak's green U-turn on cars and boilers after he accuses them of not caring about the £15,000 cost to families of Net Zero plans"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12548521/Environmentalists-legal-challenge-Rishi-Sunaks-green-U-turn-Net-Zero.html

This was predictable,but not for those wearing rose-tinted specs. By the way, the cost will be far greater than £15,000. £45,000 is more like it, and that is at present day prices.

"Environmentalist plot legal challenge to Rishi Sunak's green U-turn on cars and boilers after he accuses them of not caring about the £15,000 cost to families of Net Zero plans"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12548521/Environmentalists-legal-challenge-Rishi-Sunaks-green-U-turn-Net-Zero.html

"But what happens when gas power — which last year accounted for 38.4 per cent of electricity generation — is removed from the grid?" - that is from this article -

"ROSS CLARK: There's one net zero deadline that's fast approaching which Rishi Sunak didn't mention. And it should seriously worry all of us"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12547243/ROSS-CLARK-net-zero-deadline-approaching-Sunak-didnt-mention.html

"But what happens when gas power — which last year accounted for 38.4 per cent of electricity generation — is removed from the grid?" - that is from this article -

"ROSS CLARK: There's one net zero deadline that's fast approaching which Rishi Sunak didn't mention. And it should seriously worry all of us"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12547243/ROSS-CLARK-net-zero-deadline-approaching-Sunak-didnt-mention.html

I didn't say it - Cookoo did - 15p is coming - and it will unless they can monetise Pensacola - but how likely is that?

They announced the discovery of the biggest NS gas field found in the last ten years and the share price dropped - a lot.

Wake up to the new reality.

Laura - when this was FLX, people paid the equivalent of over 600p per share, pre-consolidation price.

Falling Knife was the only one on here who predicted the huge fall.

Sunak said, about the Net Zero plans, "costs that no one was ever told about" - I told you about them, and DrPatience called me a conspiracy theorist for telling you.

Keep up with your mockery and abuse against me - it only make you look foolish.

Bid: 25.50 - DrP never warned you about this. To anyone new to this board - I am hated on here because, from chart analysis, I made two correct forecasts for the sp - the drop from 4p to 3.2p and soon after, the drop from 3.2p to 2.3p. (pre-consolidation prices) They don't like to hear about price falls. They want only talk about it going up.

Prior to that, DrP used to agree with me, he would often posts things like "Well said Noel" or "I agree Noel".

That was when I was positive about the sp. Then DELT announced the discovery of the biggest gas field in the NS in the last ten years, and the sp went down.

That woke me up to the new reality and I could see futher falls ahaed. I was right - the sp has droped form over 40p to now 25.5p. They hate it when I am right.

DrP then showed his true colours. He told me to shut up, stop posting. I didn't stop and so he turned very nasty posting insults and abuse - because I didn't obey his orders. Who does he think he is telling others what they may or may not day on here? DrPatience has no patience, he cannot stand others having an opinion that he doesn't like.

It is still not 100% certain that there will be new gas exploration licences.

The NSTA has said it will grant them, so is it worth discussing this topic? Yes, because, as we saw yesterday, commitments can be abandoned. Things we are told will happen are not guaranteed to happen, e.g. no petrol or diesel cars after 2030.

I have previously said that I think they will grant new licences, but I am watching events unfolding and weighing up the balance of probabilities in an ever-changing landscape.

There are powerful forces on both sides of the global warming \ climate change \ green agenda, that is why I have said that Sunak has a balancing act on his hands.

By the way, I heard Sunak speaking on the Today programme this morning and yet again I have been proved right in things I said in previous posts.

I have been telling you that this Net Zero \ Great Reset business would make our lives miserable. Sunak said it. He talked about the huge bills that would hit us to make the changes to our homes. He mentioned £15,000, but many times we have been told that the bill is more likely to be around £45,000 per household. That is just one aspect of the horrors of Net Zero.

Back to things closer to DELT - new licences. I'm sure Sunak doesn't want more drilling. This about turn from Sunak is only because he realised that there is pushback and going too fast for the green targets risks losing the election, so he is simply telling the people what they want to hear (as Lenin did). He watered down the green agenda because needs to find the path of least resistance, but just wait. He can't be trusted, and this morning Nick Robinson exposed a bit of his slippery, sneaky tactics and duplicitous words.

The Greenpeace \ Just Stop Oil campaign against new licences is just about to begin. We must wait to see if it succeeds or will the new new licences be granted before thy can really get going?

Ignore the "nothing blue skies" talk from DrPatience. He never takes off his rose-tinted specs and his posts are nothing more than specious drivel.

"have seen share jump massively at times" - you've never seen FLX \ FCS jump massively and stay up. All rises have fizzled out in a short time - don't take my word for it - look at the FLX \ price chart. The FCS chart shows it a bit, but doesn't go back far enough to show it as well as the FLX chart does, and I've been watching FCS for years, and was a shareholder for many years and sold at a huge loss.

It's looking better for the chances of new gas exploration licences.

Sunak is backtracking on the push for Net Zero.

Yet again events back me up. Didn't I say he had a balancing act - the BBC has just phrased it like this - "the tension between long term goals and short term political pressures" - in other words, a balancing act. I was right.

He was probably forced to back down by the realists in the Tory party who pointed out the madness of the Net Zero plans and how it was almost impossible to switch to 100% renewable energy - as was the point of all those articles I showed you about that topic.

They said it was impossible and they have been vindicated.

So, we might actually get news of DELT winning new licences.

Expect that to lift the sp to 28p. It will stay there for a day or two then drop back. Just my opinion, but that is what these boards are for, so rather than savaging me, why not post your own opinions and forecasts.

It's looking better for the chances of new gas exploration licences.

Sunak is backtracking on the push for Net Zero.

Yet again events back me up. Didn't I say he had a balancing act - the BBC has just phrased it like this - "the tension between long term goals and short term political pressures" - in other words, a balancing act. I was right.

He was probably forced to back down by the realists in the Tory party who pointed out the madness of the Net Zero plans and how it was almost impossible to switch to 100% renewable energy - as was the point of all those articles I showed you about that topic.

They said it was impossible and they have been vindicated.

So, we might actually get news of DELT winning new licences.

Expect that to lift the sp to 28p. It will stay there for a day or two then drop back. Just my opinion, but that is what these boards are for, so rather than savaging me, why not post your own opinions and forecasts.

Oil and gas, Net Zero, renewable energy, the green agenda - it's all one huge topic and it is is relevant to DELT's future prospects. (LSE Admin - do not remove this post. It is not offensive nor abusive.)

Yet more evidence to back up my posts - see what I said about Sunak having a balancing act on his hands - here I am proved right -

"Rishi Sunak is conducting an 'audit' of the Government's Net Zero green strategy after his advisers warned that the cost burden on families is hitting the Conservative Party's chances at the next Election.

Downing Street insists that the Government remains committed to its target of reducing the UK's net emissions of greenhouse gases by 100 per cent – relative to 1990 levels – by 2050.

But the Prime Minister has been told he has enough 'wriggle room' to water this down because the UK is doing better than countries such as Germany, the US and Canada at lowering emissions."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526887/Will-Conservatives-scrap-boiler-ban-Prime-Minister-Rishi-Sunaks-new-Net-Zero-review.html

I give my opinion and it is informed opinion. Others on here have only false accusations, misrepresentation, insults and abuse to offer, plus a few specious comments from people with with no patience.

How to make money in stocks.

In the next two weeks the DELT sp will double. In a month it will triple.

There, are you happy now. That is what you want to hear. That is all you want to hear.

You praise those who post things like that, even though it never comes true, but you attack anyone who says they think the sp will drop - and it does come true.

You attack people for telling the truth simply because it isn't what you want to hear.

Let me tell you - that isn't the way to make money.

LSE admin - do not remove this post. It is not abusive or offensive. It is an accurate account of their attitude in their postings. Look at the posts over the last two days to see the insults and abuse against me - just because I correctly forecast this drop in the share price.

Over the past few years when the results have come out, the sp rose a little on the day, but over the next day or two, the rise fizzled out and the downtrend resumed.

LSE admin - I am simply stating a fact. Do not remove ths post. It is not abusive or offensive.

Here is the real reason why they (the gang of 8) attack me.

The share price is falling. I said it would. They are losing money and they don't like it, so they redirect their anger towards me.

Why don't they make angry post against those who made forecasts of the price going up. Their forecasts were wrong but they don't get the insults and abuse that I get for being right.

The gang of 8 are angry at themselves for making the wrong decision - i.e. if they had listened to me they would have avoided this loss, but they didn't listen to me. They chose instead to mock and insult me, tell me that I was wrong with my forecast for the sp. As it has turned out they were wrong and they don't like it, so they give me abuse. It makes them feel better.

SP about to dip below 26p. Once that breaks, there is a chance it will fall off a cliff, but I say it with the usual proviso - that news of monetising Pensacola will lift the sp.

As well all know, it's a gamble, but a risky gamble. Usually risky gambles come with the chance of high reward (high risk \ high reward) but in DELT's case I'm not sure there will be high reward. They announced that they had discovered the largest NS gas field discovered in the last ten years and the SP has gone down ever since.

If news like that can't lift the sp, what will?

Don't blame me. I'm just saying. Blame the market. Other than a few brave gamblers there seems to be little interest in the shares, it's not my fault. *** a few brave gamblers - I'm one, I took the risk of Pensacola paying off and I recently bought DELT shares so why do I still get abuse on here. You should be cheering me.