RE: NEED TO VOTE NO (AGAIN)17 Mar 2024 14:02
G_G_G, I agree. This is the sort of thing I had in mind after they said they "are considering what to do". On 4th March I posted, in reference to other companies I had been in where the shareholders go robbed - " "what to do" meant they were working out how to pull their next stunt and find a workaround to let them succeed in giving it away. They weren't looking to find a better deal for the PIs."
I suspected that something similar would happen with this SHG takeover bid.
I'm sorry to say Harrogate4, that I doubt that the law will offer us any protection. I hope I am wrong, in theory it should do so, but my past experiences in AIM companies has left me with the impression that it is a rigged casino and those who pull stunts know all the loopholes in the law, so even though their actions are what most people would consider to be theft or fraud, are actually legal \ borderline legal.
I hope I am wrong and 20p comes our way.