Member Info for NikeAir180

You do not know who took photos Banbury. As for your coflation, your mwrging of details to try and acgieve an overall negative: the 07/10/24 RNS explained change of team to get equipment on to the ground regarding Faso Greenstone - with a different intial sourcing of equipment. 06/11/24 - relevant equipment paid for and potential six months spares to arrive in mid-january 2025. 18/11/25 - equipment in 0ugadougou. 13/12/24 annual report, Chairman's statement - Billings and equipment were on site - minimum license requirents were fulfilled.

12:28: Point 3 is, literally, ascribed to yourself.

11:18 - they never explainrd why - because thay didn't say it.

10:29: he never said the words as you put them, you typically ascribe words that were not said.

Speaking of food: Kamoto Copper Company and Matunda Mining SARL will enable Glencore to provide Cobalt Hydroxide feedstock to Cobalt Blue for refining purposes in Western Australia. Possibly from a part of the world RRR knew could produce "popcorn".

Doesn't ✅ Sometimes the less words the better. : )

Regarding typos, these days, it doesnt't seem possible to condense the text to scroll back, when there is quite a lot - which I find to be correct. 😉

Point 2 at 18:10 seems to be a conflation all equipment including whaever was referred to in Chairman's statement of annual report 13/12/24 with negative implication via scornful conflation.

The above does not refute the cohesion between RNS' of 06/11/24, 18/11/24, 13/12/24 and 31/03/25. The specific start up, test production equipment referred to in 06/11/24 was paid for according to that RNS it was in Ougadougou as per 18/11/24 and I presume it was or was some of the equipment that was on site according to Chairman's statement 13/12/24 where minimum licence conditions were fulfilled to maintain the licencse (parahrased interpretation from nemory).

The 06/11/24 RNS referred to six months spares - equipment which was to arrive in middle of january (2025) it is possible that tha is the equimpent which is referred to as bein in customs - half year report - Charmans statement as per 31/03/25. Even if all of tbe equipment was in customs, that would not necessarily refute the earlier charman"s statement of 13/12/24.

Had there been an update in Aoril, that could perhaps have been clarified, maybe it will be clarified this summer, if not, maybe during an Australian summer. : ) 🍻

13:37 and 13:45 are in consideration of Faso Greenstone.

... as it was clear nothing had yet started.

They weren't predictions as it was clear nothing had yet stated - loose moddeling imagining a future start - as was made clear, think that pretty much stopped or significantly reduced when presumption of start stopped. Change of plan later in the year - equipment did get on to site with license requirements fulfilled, thus far, acccording to Chairman's statement in the annual report of 13/12/24.

Do x , would ✅

Banbury, it is a fact that I did not. It also, by coincidence, a fact that I just had s glass of water for supper and no din dins, a rare instance which the remover of the posts wouldn't know for sure but do know this post starts with fact; it ends like that.

07:18:: it did not say that Banbury, it did say: "some of our gold production equipment is in process of being released from customs".

... and "near term" is not the same as by the end of this year but in the event of near term production happening, it would have to be by the end of a year. Equipment was on the ground by the end of last year as per annual report of 13/12/24 - Chairman's statement.

13:27: you were quoting "modelling" and not an estimate Banbury.

Equipment was site according to annual report of 13/12/24 -Chairman's Statement.

... Speaking of which, I only realsed today what Helpful meant by "RRBB", thought it was some kind of irony to do with R'R... had truly been missing an .. r.. 🍻 Can't see any cups of tea on here. : )

13:46: Utter Tosh Banbury, hadn't even read the 13:08 post, do the maths.

Banbury, you over-interpret promising.