Member Info for NikeAir180

... Lubumbashi is the correct spelling with respect.

19/01/22 RNS referred to judgement of Commercial Court in Lubambashi, there was no judgement from the Supreme Court in 2022 relevant to 12/06/25 RNS - RRR speficity from what I have researched, if I am correct to the point that the research is sufficient, the post that was considered at 12:26 was flawed in logic.

Re. 09:44... Literally just reading todays's posts for the time excluding, the two pre-dawn ones by me, so 09:44 is complete tosh Banbury - based on the fact that one would have to read it before asking for it to be removed, the chronological likelihood is more with a naysayer - possible, than your false claim - which was impossible. 😎

Cold 🥫on toast... 🌟 actually quite nice. : ' )

The repetition was nothing to do with irritation at typos, thought I had replied to the wrong thread, but realised that was incorrect, perhaps slighty distracted by bbcnews24, time for beans on toast which was occasionally discussed with moderate approval by News. Fuel...🥫

12/06/25 RNS: "as it prepares a gold programme for exploration and then production at its Boulon license, which is required to start within two months". It might be exploration that is required to start within two months of the RNS, subsequent production seems to be intended but that requirement may not be limited to within two months.

12//06/25 RNS "as it prepares a gold programme for.exploration and then production at its Boulon license, which is required to start within two months".

The above is sequential ... exploration and then production and so it might be explorarion that is required to start within two months from 12th June 2025. Subsequent production seems to be an intention but that expectation might not be limiteed to within two months start time.

El Limon 🌟

Re. 08:54: there was a bigger increase than that in the calendar year of 2010 by the time of the annual report of 23/12/24 - went from 1p to 14p ( 1.77 - 14p in the second half of the year by time of the annual report) some have said there was a higher all time peak - presumably either from the end of 2010 or in tbe first half of 2011, that annual report referred to positive information regarding Jupiter iron ore, and gold interests. The EL Limon royalty which will hopefully re-start in tbe second half of this year is a legacy of one of those gold interests.

Well, he did on CPAI...

Are you absolutely positive on that Banbury? : ' )

A nice wise thing Maidit once said, implied: "don't feed the trolls".

He has evidentially been sharp on intermittent news. : )

Yep, posotive attitude... I like QBT too, no-one knows the future on some specifics, including naysayers, but I have always liked reading your posts Maidit.

15:11: ... (so defined by the armour and the "ye shall not pass" character)...

British beers - "Aye". : ) The non-alchohol stuff contiunues to improve in quality, there is a stout that is well known for its quality in more than one variation.

Anyway, a task to do and then brunch.

Cheers : )

07:08 - Banbury, I'm not sure whether you will realise the joke alluded to, the other day, was quite layered. Cleese played "the black knight" (so defined by the armour) and Lancelot - that was quite possibly a joke within a joke and a nod to Arthurian legend, Lancelot sometimes fought and went on missions in disguise e.g. as a red knight and as a black knight - facilitated by the armour he was wearing.

Read a far bit of Arthurian books when very young and had probably, like a lot of people walked up Arthur's Seat by then, Pentlands as well... many years before Scottish Lagers, English Ales, Brtish Beers, Irish and British Stouts.

As for the joke knight not giving up - then calling it a draw...

With regard to original text e.g. RNS' and public videos and interviews - putting on or claiming a filter is on, ignoring correction, doubling down and further repetition does not make it a draw. 🍻

... ha ha .. after the second pint... still a different format on the website without paying to avoid the adverts -perhaps or it is a generally different format, so it is genuinely more difficult for me to go back through longer posts to edit. Wider lines on the typing, contracting the box etc.

Actual facts: gym session, then needed some energy before walking back - 70g of cashew nuts and two pints of Guinness. Relaxed finish for a very good reason but I didn't buy or drink anthing more after tge seci d pint, did stay, longer chatting, there was a valud reason for the later finish and I was welcome to.

Walked home, got a couple of tasks done, read the share chat, posted at 01:51. Then had three slices of bread, fruit, tea and water. Second sentence of 21:48 should in terms of grammar have been part of tbe first realised, I hadn't put enough effort into checking the .

03:38 reads okay in light of the earlier post but on its own was not well enough expressed so was clarified in my last post before it was fully dawn.

Narural daylight is always slightly easier to keep up with one's typing and read other posts precisely if one has enough time and energy.

03:38 ... as one of the more interesting ones...

It wasn't News who was being inconsistent so I was not pointing out inconsistency to him - clarification.

Cheers

Not easy for me to edit typos with contracting and opening the box etc, I have found that quite consistently. : ' )

Correction of my 01:51 post:

Blueboy1975 at 21:48 false post - second sentence. ✅

Banburyboy at 14:51 - a generally false post.

The both sometimes like a ✍whopper in my opinion because of their distance sometimes, with regard to accuracy in presented interpretation from what has been publicly said or witten.

Regarding memory of sceptical humour by News, that is as I remember it but haven't checked back, I regarded that inconsistency which I referred to one of the more interesting ones, have occasionally pointed out to him his incocistency when he has said he had reason to be negative on RRR for five years, ten years, twenty years - different time spans at different times.

The ten and twenty year periods did include some upside according to the annual reports.

Cheers : )

Blueboy1975 at 21:48 - false post - first sentence.

Banburyboy at 14:51 - a generally false post.

They are quite similar in liking a ✍whopper.

If I remember it correctly, Banbury, it was News who pointed out to you in 2024 :') that Greenland write off was a newly described personal experience of RRR when you said, within your inconsistency, that you had been around since the potential asset sale - Melville Bay.

Anyway, as I said. 🍻