Member Info for NikeAir180

... as well as a bigger slice within a bigger pie. : )

If there is a return on the main part of the pie, there would also be a return on the relevant slice - if still a 10% slice: in the positive return scenario - with the same ratio: it would be a biigger slice, within a bigger pie.

Whatever happens woith crypto... if such a miner pays Zephyr for energy in the near future it would prove some of what Zephyr can do - with early revenue from their own production.

As he agreed it was an issue of shares which is a type of dilution, he.was not attempting to cover up a dilution event.

... with no favouritism: whichever was better. : )

Thank you blueboy1975, it is the simple things in life...

I wish you a good weekend too and all... whatever group, category or unique individuality perceives the bright, warm days. 😎🎾🍺

Variation of soft bounce from Banbury. Helpful has already said he's not in Telegram. Peraps around two years ago someone on twitter / X suggested there was going to be some sort of article with a mention. Helpful reposted the link on this share chat and said "No idea if it is true or not".

Bit of a soft bounce that one...

There was genuinely some humour, even if not literal, in the way you closed it out. 🎾

Not too bad an answer Blueboy, like I have said before to one of the B'bs, I don't have idols.

Tell you what I'll improve it a litlle bit:

You have also echoed Banbury in your claim to have used the filter...

There was some genuine humour, even if not entirely literal, in the way you closed it out. 🎾

Blueboy1975, that what you echoed was not shown - it was just an echo of a false 10:30 post. You alsi echoed Banbury in your clsim of using a filter but within tbe last couple of days it seems like you might not have been using the filter and my instinct is tbat you weren't... it was more like someone putting their fingrs in their ears. Perhaps your filter comment was not literally the case and perhaps your expression of of ire is more about expression, similar to your expression about a filter. To then post today as if your filter is back on is somewhat like a person putting their fingers in their ears and saying "ner ner".

Anyway, with regard to the latter part of your 13:53 comments: nah...

12:14... 12/06/25 RNS: "as it prepares a gold programme for exploration and then production"✍ ✅

Re. 10:30 post by Banbury re. 03/07/24 RNS "what did the service provider know" - neither the same line or anything similar, pertaining to the service provider regarding 03/07/24 RNS was posted by Helpful from the end of june 2024 through to the start of august 2024 and I do not recollect it ever being posted by Heplful in relation to that RNS. The 10:30 post by Banbury is false.

10:17: you know you are lying Banbury - semantics distinctions between words and all that. Haven't read the most recent linked articles yet so you are wrong on that for a start and I am relaxed / positive about Zephyr - always have been.

2024: Not really blueboy, i pointed out what AI said to a question I put into the search engine, I also realised I had partially assumed an extra step in one variace of what the RNS meant but then realised that was likely incorrect. For those who said it wasn't well written - I think it was more like a type of parlance which some can immediately understand and others might after doing a bit of research.

In summer, there might be less sleeves over the aces.

13:57: joke, 🎾

10:45: the 11/12/23 RNS is a relevant follow on.

11:13: the comments section under that article were illuminating, Bell and Winnifrifth were in agreement.

Give or take a minute- obviously. : )

Think you need to not take thing so literally blueboy'75 - cheers. Read that book and seen the film, not so easy to remember now but think I went out with someone who met the main actor, a couple of others from a relevant film to recent discussions though not a Monty Python one.

Sometimes a tea break might be about fifteen minutes but given the mental and often physical nature of acting, I wouldn't be suprised if it was sometimes double that.