Member Info for NikeAir180

No Duke, I am a different perceiver than you, definitely not in the technical sense as I said - in my opinion, beyond that, I don't care. Ta da

.. position.. ✅ 💤

Dukey - 06:32, I dont really care if he buys or sells, reduces or increases a postion, as long as people aren't intentionally creating a false impression, if chatting on here, whilst doing so and are adheing to the regulations, so what?

...seems to be talking up whilst looking to or actually selling out according to an internet technical defintion of ramping - which I definitely don't think Helpful has been doing; the slangy application seems to me, on these forums, to be just talking up a share - which probably ends up being a matter of opinion for the perceiever, it is for the talker (writer) to know in the former example - in general... whether he / she is or isn't. Three chats... correct. 💤

Dukey, I looked up "ramping" a while ago and the technical.meaning seems to.be taking up a share while looking to or acually selling out - to the contrary of talking it up. Tbe slangy application on this and other forums seems to be just taliking it up - maybe, I definitely don't think Helpful has been doing the former and taliking up a share versus balance is sometimes a matter of opinion for the perceiver, the former is a matter of fact either way for the talker. Back to correlatuon for 1.2p... I reckon and what Harold Macmillan said.. : )

Blueboy,your trolling doesn't work, it it is just greasing a pan for all your chips - though that might work, to be fair. ⚽️🏆👏 Well.done to a team without any mental or attitude chips and with good spirit... ✌

Yep... and it was page 326 with the date and time referred to earler today which I have just checked is correct, ten to fifteen minutes, to skip / scroll through the pages, to be clear the post is nothing... like what you outlined, nor are the other posts I considered in aspect, the referenced one was just slightly cheeky a little bit of an attitude which has interesting contrast to some mud that has been slung at you, a flexible attitude.

As you know, some of the posters' various mud slinging your way is an indirect attempt to be negative about the the company, in spite of that: best to keep it clean - generally, in my opinion.

It was Harold Macmillan ✅ I was more in a 1970s mood... inflation, gold was interesting and there was a start of a space opera. Helpful, 14:50 and twelve minutes ago.

Specinvestor'99, I agree Helpful is not a doctor and will add this is a share that has had some issues but might have some 💰💰... of gold, conceptually - which is more relevant in consideration of issues, aspects and back and forth.

Dukey, correlation and not causation perhaps, think it was Harold Wilson who said "Events dear boy, Events!". Content to be corrected, although I hope I'm right. ✅

Helpful, not sure if you are reading today, skim over, a bit annoyed or impatient, whichever or none of these, I would recommend you read 14:50... ... if you miss it, oh well. In spite of provocatuon elsewhere, I expect an intelligent reading and Star Wars style - balance of the force.

I can remember content and wonder if the movement of light sabers can sound like a whoosh, 🎾, jokes I can anticipate, I could talk about the contrasting strengths of Yoda and Mace Windu but am keeping it more basic and was not previously talking about a galaxy far, far away.

Perhaps you missed a subtetly Helpful. I will make it more obvious. There was a post by a naysayer who could be positive elsewhere: On board spirit of adventure - 14/12/21 - 20:53... I think it is no worse than a little bit cheeky but it becomes overall very cheeky after some of the repetitive stuff chucked at you. I will add given other posts... previous emplotees of a company posting on a share chat relevant to their previos companys are not insiders by just virtue of a previous closer relationship to a company nor is someone who works in a seperate beach huts industry or company an insider just becaise of that job even if the share chat might have something to do with ships, cruises, trips etc.

The above post , referenced, may be up tomorrow, maybe not, I don't do screen shots and I think it is better just to read it , certainly not to chuck it. Posts in consideration of other posters are not necessarily relevant to their own posting.

As far as I can tell you have never been employed by RRR, you aree not a major shareholder of RRR and something you have in common with many other posters, is an understanding of the rules, with regard to and irrespective of any other assets.

.... the word was bumbeler which was misspelt compared to.bumbler. ✅

Helpful, there is irony given a more positive attitude with a very loose application of a word that Banbury was utilising on tbe Saga forum.

Speaking of words this seems like a reasonable time to confirm Banbury was not the originator of mbele or Mbele on this forum. The word was bumbeler which was mispelt compared to bumbler, so News would not have found bumbeler if trying to ascertain its meaning and perhaps given what he might have been researching at the time either via predictive text or search engine suggestion,mbele popped up, he went with that rather than checking back. It waa definitely bumbeler from the post that he had considered, a couple of days later on a saturday, I had never read the two relevant posts at the time so some time later when I was asked by Banbury what I thought of that word, I said I had no opinion on tbe original use because I hadn't read the posts, I have caught up with them now.

All rather long winded but I agree with Banbury that News was a more interesting poster than me, he was a generally excellent poster and one thing he did point out to Banbury was that Banbury would focus on the particular rather than the general (or specifics in isolation would be another way to put it), he also emphasised that asset valuations are relevant to a balanced accounting view as well as debts.

There were more figures than just the one referred to in the SP post this morning, in the 21/07/25 RNS.

On the other hand, El limon was profitable as evidenced by the 19/10/12 annual report - £449,551 profits for the year end accounts and £229,271 was the share of that attributed to RRR. The 14/04/2015 RNS detailed the sale of El Limon / Columbian gold interests for €5million which was to be paid in stages - the bulk (more than two thirds) of the $3million royalty will potentially re-start this year.

Re. 20:43: Correct as in intentions, plans at the time, you have heard of the expression "plans change" - happens in all walks of life - as long as there are updates whether consistent with previous ones or explaining how timings, tactics or even plans might have changed - if the intent is honest, then your distortion of the recent past is a deparure from accuracy... fast.

That was not the statement but (for the twitter format) it would have been a long... read.

... split... but I get the joke now blueboy'75 but the weight of comments not corresponding to reality is wih you - the mass remains with you as opposed to updates which are correct when they are correct and ammended if the situation changes, so they could be correct at the time.

Blueboy1975, one truck load could easily be around 20 tonnes, 200 tonnes minus 20 is 180 tonnes, 180 tonnes is around about 200 tonnes but the 200 tonnes is is unevenly spit brtween Beira and Harare; where are the RNS'? You find them; just becaue you question otherwise doesn't mean you can adequately answer where, why, or what - differently.

11:50: fake example.

... would have been complicated to explain via response by tweet as he was saying itat was complicated for that format, at that time, then a good explanaition via most recent relevant video update posted on X and written update via most reccent RNS.

Sounds like it became more than one process and the additional one was a precautionary tactic. It would definitely have been conplicated to explan via X and I am sure he simply knew when was appropriate via RNS.