Member Info for NikeAir180

The "false narrative" mentioned at 11:07 on this chat, was just from you at 11:07 Banburyboy.

... Actually ...😎

Acrually blueboy'75 - for balance: he didn't say which year.

07:10 - the exernal writer referred to in your post did not say that Banbury - he made clear to Bell on tbe commemts section under the article - as you know, I dont think that writer has to answer to an editor other than himself - relebant to some of his published articles and their eventual content. You might find that chat rule 5d relevant to this website and it share chats mean that your extrapolation and Theeeduke's originaton - yesterday evening - do not have much weight on this forum.

One thing you werre right about Banbury: 16:41, is not to.be put attributed comment within quotation marks "What do tbey know?" are your words not from the post you and '75 weree considering. It was actually more like - approximately, "why would they be there if there was no licence?". You weren't trying to slunk away from rhat with your substitution were you? or perhaps just trying to add a word around a theme? : ' ) your Saga posts are an easy read.

... ) 🎸🪗 🍻

Incorrect post 15:51, from you Bluevoy'75, I am not very quick to challenge naysayers on fundraise speculations - recall is not easy of that so I estimate such exaggerared postulation by you to from me, to be somewhere between mininimal and never thus far.

Monday is not over and there will be future mondays, I agree that Hepful was being optimistic for this monday but the distinction between expect and promise is correct, the reading of both you and Banbury is good; 🍻same beer sometimes? Nice with your different brexit perspectives that you can dovetail on here in close sequence (almost like you're both part of Banbury's detailed pub group) - part of which (previous to pub group mention, News pointed out before, his instinct was simpler than mine - I carry more than one quite generously, with good coherence.

Have a nice evening, within a good week. : )

Your final two sentences at 13:54 are yor sometime technique - Banbury - the final sentence: barely a sentence reads like you are still taking about production but of course realisable on an immeediate re- read you had in consideration Hepful s post on friday which Blueboy'75 quoted from. Your 14:45 post does of course show what were your considerations, those final two sentence - stucture and flow - an intentional style sometimes - always worth a consideration of that. A posters expectation of updates today even if expressed, is not a promise to others of updates today.

Also I couldn't fimd that which said at 14:45 over the last few days - re Helpful and Theeeduke.

"slthering" was actually the word - similar to sliding in the context of no sliding away after being proved wrong.

Yep Helpful - regarding the link - and it was the 06:11 (not 08:11) post I was referring to - Bumigeb - Burkina Faso typed into internet search engine results in: bureau of mines and geology of Burkina.

Point 2 - 08:11 by Banbury - a repeated lie. RRR twitter feed on friday after mentined mentioned Burea of mines with o e of the photos and Mumingeb is equivalent to Bureau of Mines and Geology of Burkina - easily available public information if typing Bumingeb - Burkina Faso to internet search engine.

.. ed ✅😉

Theeeduke - 07:50 - pertainining to.me you are a liar - pertaining to Kaintz - he brought in investment to Corcel in recent years and help them survive during Covid times - so you are wrong again.

Further to 00:43 - a quck revisit while charging the phone and haven't got time to specifically locate and respond to the revleant threads but Blueboy'75 - you acknowledged to Helpful that you got it wrong on something that hadn't been reinvested in to Steelmin - think it was into Mussoni. You acknowledged Helpful was correct you were wrong but this year illogically claim he tells lies.

In 2021 you scurrilosly claimed Bell would soon be gone after Jupiter sale proceexs had gone through.

He is not gone he is still here in 2025 - were you mistaken in 2021 and how do tbink your prediction of something wrong as a fact reads in 2025?

Bell turned on on this share chat to correct something that then a naysayer would acknowledge on tbe forum that he - the naysayer was wrong so - that was not a fib by Bell and he was still here after what you said two years earlier.

One other thing: you have stated your history with RRR - which may be true and of course posters can be in a stock longer than they have posted - your first RRR post seems to have been in 2017 - with rhe time you saved not posting too much maybe you could have found time to read the annual reports of 2018 and 2020 referring to profitable accounting year ends. Head scratcher how you pleaded ignorance to me - approximate memory of what you said - "where are they then nike" regarding profitable years for RRR - five profitable years thus far according to the annual reports. Perhaps you prefer having a go without reading annual reports, possibly you do read them but prefer to be totally negative in your skewed outline of RRR history - skewed by the lack of balance in your posts.

Banbury - 20:06 - re. 10% ownership of Faso - false with regard to Faso Greenstone - post of percentage - in my opinion, according to my memory of postings. Will correct and retract if there is a valid correction of this post.

Banbury has been corected on multiple occasons by Helpful regarding how Banbury has tried to spread out 10%, I think he is wrong again at 20:06.

Spec' - it wasn't a forecast and it was based on RRR's own slides according to Helpful - pages of equipment scale up intention on RRR's were given by Helpful, VAT, air freight etc got in the way of equipment being delivered - then different team, smaller scale equimpment start up as per October - December RNS - 24. There hasn't been modelling of what might be possible by Helpful fo quite some time since then in retaion to Faso Greenstone since before Greypoint International contribution announced - if i remember correctly.. You might not like that spread of facts but facts they are - not ever a lie by Helpful in my opinion but if persons(s) were to repeat a false comment - and know or have been made aware - comment is false - then that would be a repetition of something that is untrue.

20:11: Banbury - RRR said they were on site on tbe twitter feed - friday just gone - from all the photos that afternnon - perhaps you can't recognise. Alternatively you like your repetition because you think the repetition will reinforce your negative perspective but it actually just repeats it.

Blueboy'75 - been around since 2013 with your story that you invested in RRR when it was multiples higher and you multiples down on your investment but even though having been around RRR since 2013 you are unaware seemingly of profitable years 2018 and 2020 as if you don't want to read RNS' / annual reports or choose to forget them. No sycophancy.from me, you just choose to attack to contine your negative take on RRR.

Of course you also chose to attack News and Helpful, maybe there was a little humour there - maybe there wasn't but why the attac? - because you didn't likee positive perspectives which challenge - whether directly or not - your negative narrative - and your origin point for RRR might be true, it might be an incorrect recollection but it did provide a presented reason to keep repeating over the years how much you wre down on RRR since 2013 or so even though 2018 and 2020 were profitable years which you were seemingly unaware of - fronting ignorance to me, then repetition of implied never any good times with RRR - historically you are wrong - some good stuff, some not so good - future remains unkown.

Nice try ont't but new variant on repetition, you miss the chat target - implied face to face approach not allowed, ditto alternatives. Not nice really, were you.

Mmh.... - excpect it be....

C ya.