Member Info for NikeAir180

...RRAL... ✅

12:34... at points in january and february of 2022 it was possible to sell RRR at 0.58 and buy up to 0.65 according to my my own tranches - overall sells in the firstvquarter includingvweighting - probably a slughtly higher average than the buy price in thatvquarter for me - my overall sell price fir that year was slightly higher than the buy - point is clearly it was trading around 0.6 on more than one occasion i2022 and motivation for moving around on tbe stock - i had other gold investments so was prioritising versus what I could afford to hold down, significantly averaging down waa not an option. I dud buy a small holding in a less flexibke wrapper that year and have always maintained a postion in that one. Have generally maintained a RRR position in both wrappers since soon after RRAl deal announced - briefly exited one posituon for five days inclusive of a weekend in autumn of 2024 but bought back in after that and have only sometimes added since then - boring detail but to be clear in slight correction of a previous commen, I have always maintained or added to both RRR holdings this year and have more cash runway than last year.

Re. 11:08: Getting towards 8 years now that Heloful has been here from a share price of 0.625. It went up to low 1s in 2018 on more than one one occasion as can be evidenced from reading enough posts from tbe first quarter of that year with the adjacent share price, the ten year chart I looked at clearly shows RRR in the low 1s on more than one occasion within the first half of 2020 and it was trading around 0.6 in the first quarter of 2022, four years and some months after Helfpul's first RRR post which was on 10/11/17 when the price was 0.625.

21:14: Regardless, it was of an evening before the next day, some days before November.

Clarifying earlier post: at a time when Soma were aiming to restart the mill by end of june (this year).

No Banbury - 15:13, it was on Gold thread - 08/05/25 - approximately 28k (just slightly under 28k) assuming 14 days use of the Mill relevant to RRR by the end of June - modelleling in response to your suggestion restart in June would be very low value. It wasn't predicting a restart in june and thus it was not an estimate - it was countering some of your negativism and was at a time when Soma were aiming to restart El Limon Mill by the end of this year, the El Limon has now come back on line and this has happened before the end of August and they hope to scale up the amount of gold ounces that goes through that Mill over the coming weeks and next few months.

Spodumene lithium ore... no need to rush on that in my opinion - there has been recent newsflow relatating to some of RRR's gold assets.

14:51 ... on RRR , slight wonky editing.

Re. 18/11/21 - 04:21: You are clearly wrong in some details Theeeduke - for example when Helpful started posting on R RR the share price was 0.625, the following year it was sometimes above 1p ... it would go below 1p again but in 2020 it was back slightly above 1p at different points early in the year, eventually there would be lockdowns and other complications which was part of the historical background to a share price that declined.

The 10 year chart is clear regarding 2020, regarding 2018 - it is evidenced by reading posts on RRR from the first quarter of that year and checking the adjacent share price.

.... starting from January 2018 the RRR share price was sometimes fractionally above 1p - this was evidenced next to some of Robins old posts, I think it reached 1.15p in March 2018. The share prcie did not stay in the 1s but from the 10 year chart I can see it was sometimes slighty above the 1p line in 2020 and estimate it to have been in the low 1s at those times - which is the highest it has been for the 5 years and a few months.

Re. 10/11/2017 - 10:22, Helpful's first post on RRR - a fair post it seems to me and clearly the share price was actually 0.625.

It wasn't 1p was it...

Re. 10:52: The 11/12/23 RNS also detailed the issue of £110,000 worth of shares - approximately 58k pf which was in satisfaction of costs paid by a high net worth investor on behalf of the Company in relation to Lithium project in Zimbabwe and Gold project(s) in Burkina Faso. The high net worh investor had established a lithium export pipeline and paid some urgent additional costs.

... away. 👈 🎯 🕘 💤💤💤

Since this morning... so he's been way less time than you have. 💤

The article necessarily maintained a creative method throughout - something Banbury has ignored throughout and while it may start off with an anecdotal quality it declines to a softer story - inaccurate in its detail and lacking in context - if Bell and Winnifrifth are correct in the comments section underneath the article and right to consider it to be a relevant matter to have responded to.

10:15: In that same comments sectioin under tge article (re. 13:47) Bell and Winnifrith are in complete agreement that it wasn't RRR who had "lifted" the 1990s photo - Bell made it very clear that lithium wasn't mined in large quaties then and that the Japanese company was not formed until 2017.

Re. 10:16: in the comments section under the releant article Bell and Winnifrith both explained the CEO was kicked off for not being bullish enough - before RNS' - and following undue speculation. Bell had apparently been joined to the Telegram group by someone else and it didn't seem from his comments that he had been trying to stimulate extra positive sentiment.

He clrearly did not actually say that Banbury, don't think your comment as put would be appreciated.

Good post Maidit - I thought you would be right on PREM and was going to check the five year chart... Banbury does post a little bit on other shares but writes more on this one - if he responds to you similarly as if he hadn't read this post because of a filter - one might assume he has a tendency towards repetition.

Am pleased that you have had some good gains Maidit which is why another repetition is just a bit silly.