Member Info for NikeAir180

... conflated attitude... 🌦

You are ignoring the distinction between assertive and aggressive Banbury, it is is possible for one to conduct oneself with both characteristics but it is also possible to be assertive - particalarly when making a clear, strong, or robust point without being aggressive - Dicko80 is merely being assertive when responding to your persistent written attacks, through your history Banbury you have done written attacks on various positive RRR posters - you are a confirmed liar on this share chat on more than one occasion.

Remember Banbury, pretending knowledge that you don't have is a form of lying - if you do not know what was discussed in the most recent RRR AGM - the rebuff of Dicko and other aggressive unfounded wriitten attack by you towards him are examples of you lying.

The presentation of your conflated attititude regarding Helpful and Dicko80 in the absence of knowkedge is an example of you lying - possible belief on your part would not on its own be sufficicient - without knowledge to be a true statement - stating it as a fact is still a lie by you. I do not think you realistically believe your most recent conflation but do believe that you like to troll.

Nothing is a surprpise. 🌦 🏖

15:17: An inversion by blueboy'75 - not a surprpise about the preverse slice. 🍕🍕🍽

It was what followed your 11:37 conjunction as you well know. Also, to clarify my previous post: not "to".

... not to.

Mr. Perverse: just Helpful, not RRR, they are not equivalent.

No blueboy'75 - your wee cheap shot is false, it wouldn't work in person, it doesn't work here, you pop up with shorter spew than other b'b' after comments of those you support sentiment wise are countered by facts, only reminding me of that. Reminder blueboy, I don't allow someone to lie to me. And without contradiction, peace out. 🍻

Fair enough Robins but there have been times when I've been logged out, even had to re-register on the same account and I have still been able to access twitter links here. I appreciate some are scornful and might disregard some of Helpful's links but for those who chose relevant link / comments on 04/09/25 as a line of attack, not having twitter accounts are not sufficient for a valid defence of potentially misleading commemts - which were unfair. 🏏

... Also bearing in mind the links on this share chat and: as an example, 08:49 - 04/09/25, a twitter / X account is not required to read an X post at 05:51, linked here at 08:43 on the same day and understand that the time difference is neither "within the hour" (Robins) or "immediately afterwards" (Banbury).

19:57: The relevant nuggets of that are completely correct Helpful - though you are being a little bit generous to Banbury in the last paragraph - that might be correct but even if it is, you are being quite generous.

No Robins - 15:40, Banbury - 16:20; 04/09/25 - Bell tweeted at 05:51, Helpful linked the tweet here on the same day at 08:43 - relevant to RRR, not within the hour, and not "immediately afterwards" Banbury - you weren't trying to paint a false picture were you?

Hah, had to go back ro tbe same spot, there was a friendly dog, fresh air and the natural stuff all good...

15:40: sarcasm Robims? how do you know Helpful wasn't just responding to someone he follows on X without some sort of mutual plan?

15:24: that was part my consideration but it is a fine line between expressing that curiousity and implied encouragement.

Anyway, have been out and about and have ppoped into the pub but had use the beer garden for internet.

Peace out. 🍻

14:32 - robins, ultimately your post was pathetic - (encouraging perhaps, given what has been said before on this share chat, additionally I have read your posts) it is an assault and it is a criminal act, yes there is a scale but consider the posts that have been before on this matter and simlar, beyond banter, they were threatening in style - possibly mainly motivated, perhaps, to try and get a (wrongly) perceived advantage on this share chat but what had gone before would make such an act, one that had a warm up.

End of some conflict here is better, to peace... 🍻

As for the before bit regarding a few bob etc, the 32m 31m etc buys amd sells last summer have been discussed here before - going forward, it is about playing a fair game or watching from the sidelines with appropriate manners. ⚽️

Couldn't find any pukka pies. 🥅

08:29 - logical fallacy.

6 hours and 20 minutes ago: i can confirm you are a liar Banbury. 💤

Your not his accountant are you Theeeduke, nor broker or financial adviser? You don't know the future, so if it turns out as you say, it would be a fluke.

I realise that it's crystallize. 😄

And se RRR song isn't over. 🌟

The post that he put out from X is not one that a boss or member of the other company, he considered, could have authentically put out at that time - a valid distinction.