Member Info for NikeAir180

... the dice has or a dice has as opposed to a dunce reading the next moo.

Reading your posts is sometimes like being a reminded of a boardgame where the dice have been rolled away from the ladders.

And also from.2024... there was a Reach announcemt on 06/03/24 and an RNS announcement on 16/09/24 part of which (Reach) and the whole of which (RNS) pertained to news re. licences in Cote d'Ivoire.

Or just pertaining to a Reach announcement which didn't necessitate follow up.

12:51: Regarding the RNS from 28/11/23, less than two whole years ago, it does sound better.

The fact is Banbury made a false comment st 11:50. It is actually an expectation of an average spend of $280k per annum over four years - rather than the "minimum spend" he chose to attempt to historicise.

In spite of your attempts, Banbury, to proffer some negativity as if it is specific wisdom, RRR have released annual reports for the twenty consecutive years that they have been a publicly isted company in each of those calendar years.

The thing about replies is, people can often read what they are replies to.

😎

💤

Approximately three hours earlier... so anyway, Helpful, were you going back to Saga - 2020?

... nor OB 1 ... 😎

"Hello there".

He is not 0B 1 Kenobi, blueboy and you ain't Darth Vader. Futher, any comments are obviously with regard to what I choose to comment on blue' a couple of years before Star Wars, chronological similarities within space are sometimes of a timely sequence within stardust as opposed to you quips between space operas' greatest hits.

16:15 .... I see you moved on from replacing "should" with will - 30/09/25, with 10p Banbury. It remains the case that aside from NAV's, in response to a question from Robins as included via your link 26/09/25, Helpful did not give an estimate of what the share price should be nor any estimate of simlar value re. specific to RRR share price, seems like your 10p is out of context.

RRR has been 10p and higher in the past.

18:19 ... do not correspond to what you said at 17:46.

17:46: Hoy, Mr. Accountant - maybe not an accountant - a share raise - issue of shares is not a borrowing. Raises are not debts. You do seem to be exaggerating RRR's debt Banbury, figures ftom the annual reports and half-year reports over the last three - four years do not corresoond to what you said at 19:46.

You are selective in how you use "sycophantic", it is not correct use of the word, blueboy1975.

Banbury in that post, you also said you had delusioms of being able to move the market, gave an excuse for a presented belief of "proof" - that if something is repeated often enough - traction can be gained. Previous format - it was past page 310, but back to the current format it would be many more pages further back on your profile.

It was one of your first posts on Saga in winter of 2020 and you may not like scrutiny but pap is always pap.

How far back did relevant posting go Helpful? Saga listed in 2014, suppose you could have gone back further on the share chat.

I only went back to latter months of 2020, Banburyboy has been posting scince latter months of 2020. It was one of the first posts from that starting point, from the first post onwards, not much later on.

It is within his first several posts on Saga that Banburyboy expressed the belief that he could mine the market (perhaps that was humour) and posited an opinion that - if something was repeated often enough it could gain traction.