Member Info for news

Specinvestor99

I balance COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS re: RRR AGM. If I live in London, I would have loved to have gone to the RRR AGM, if nothing else but to meet Mr Bell. From the way, he speaks via some answers in the Gary Carp presentation and how RRR tried to save Mr Carp from $$$ payout, I gather he is pleasant to talk to ie CULTURED and I like that.

Cultured people dont put others on the inquisition table if that is not their right , as it is here , on a public forum.

I am quite nuanced in the finer art of English and how questions are zoned in to elicit an answer or confess, yes, going to an AGM is of no use. It is of USE and that is LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE RULES ON RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS.

I woudnt just go to just RRR AGM. I would like to go to others as well IF I LIVED IN LONDON.

My age does not allow spending 3 days on the road just to get to an AGM and to spend what could come to some serious wonga.

Specinvestor99

With due respect, please dont single any holder out for special merit and question each one of us by way of inquisition style questions ie ask me what can I learn from an AGM etc. Here, in the UK, they tell you what are their experiences ie the London Stock Exchange tells investors what are one's rights as shareholders and to make use of those rights inc. calling an EGM if one wants one if one can get the votes to do so. This is a tiny AIM co ie £3m or so mkt cap.

This is not some multi-international co of which one has £3m plus to go to an AGM eg Buffett AGM's where folks fly in from all over the world as each share is worth big wonga.

If you now ask DID THE RRR AGM "EVEN TAKE PLACE", that sounds rather eerie does it? You must know company law on that surely?

Please share out your questioning skills to everyone, not to me only. Thank you. As I said, NO VIEW EXCEPT dark ones about the co and CEO are in favour ? Surely, Investors Chronicle of FT style states, BEAR POINTS, BULL POINTS and not bear points and dark thoughts of did the AGM even take place , knowing Company Law on that ?

Why not RING the NORMAD? I have contacted a normad of another co before and I got a reply from Australia. Not too ? hard is it , instead of asking on a forum when no one here has said they went.?

Specinvestor99

I live very far from London where the RRR AGM was held on Fri, 16.2.24 and so are others. If I take the only transport available, I have to get from my town to the next town, 6 miles away to make it by 6am. Usually, one 1 a day ie transport and am told there is another 1 but the chap is not sure as he does not work for the London co.

By the time, I arrive in London itself, be it Victoria, it will be at least 8.30pm IF NO TRAFFIC JAM in London. After an exhausting day, to wake up well before 6am, I have to find transport at 5am to get to the next town or walk at least 6 miles as nothing is running at 5am here.

Once in London, I have to go to a HOTEL and the cheapest now is at least £100+. I have to find a HOTEL nearest the AGM venue in London. The RRR AGM is 2pm and therefore, I have to CHECK out of the hotel at 11.30am to make checkout time usually 12 noon sharp but these days, it is earlier than 12 noon.

So, have to sit at least 3 hrs somewhere and get something to eat. Then, I attend the AGM at 2pm. It will finish at 3pm at max. NO TRANSPORT HOME AS IT IS NOT DOOR TO DOOR. TRANSPORT FROM LONDON ---ONCE A DAY ONLY BACK HOME as norm as it is not a popular route. SO, BACK TO ANOTHER HOTEL as check in is 3pm. Sleep the night, and then check out at 11.30am and catch TRANSPORT IE ONLY ONE AT 12 NOONISH HOME. GET BACK TO THE NEXT TOWN, HAVE TO GET TRANSPORT BACK TO MY TOWN.

For an investment in RRR that is small? Your case is without merit against all small holders of RRR. I ask why didnt you fly in from Canada? IN UK, ALL WAIT FOR OTHER'S CHARITY TO HEAR what happened. I am quite sure some went but they are NOT WILLING TO SHARE these days. Please spec, try to keep to Canada and not UK as you are not aware of our UK situation as norm.

Contd : Part 2

[3] Whether FQ can now WALK AWAY, post AFP RNS [FQ taken ALL 4 LICENCES & 1ST EARN IN KICKS IN] Fri, 16 Feb 2024, up to each one to decide their legal expert opinion. My observation is: THE MARKET MARKED AFP SHARES +16% a/c to one article from Market Screener via Alliance News. Read the AFP 16.2.24 RNS to check if FQ have now entered the 1st earn period, whether they can walk away?

[4] AFP can SELL --------> Mr Bird has the same type of agreement with Anglo at Bushrangers---->there, he also said he can sell.

[5] 4 years ---No RNS has stated that for FQ/AFP per poster? It states 28 Feb 2026.

[6] WHY DID FQ TAKE ALL 4 LICENCES AND ENTER NOTICES? From all the data I read from AFP via their 2023 presentation, there are FIRST QUANTUM RESULTS.

[7] I looked at the map for AFP AND WHERE THE 1ST 2 OPTION LICENCES WERE which was important. ONE OF THE FIRST 2, WAS SITTING ON THE WESTERN FORELANDS CONGLOMORATE ITSELF. The other was SOUTH of this conglomorate.

Now, the remaining 2 licences are OFF THE CONGLOMORATE. THE WESTERN FORELANDS CONGLOMORATE --->>>INTO NEW ZAMBIA------>>>FROM DRC KAMOA-KAKULA & KITKOTO WESTERN FORELANDS is the HOT PROPERTY.

A/c to ARCM's CEO [JV with Anglo and planning to start drilling anyday now at NW ZAMBIA] he said the HOTTEST PROPERTY IS THE DOME. The only other co ARCM mentioned was Colin Bird's AFP [Ref: "DOMES REGION OF ZAMBIA, A COPPER EXPLORATION HOTSPOT"-Mining Review Africa, 23.4.23 Von Schirding said only two other active explorers ie Zamare Min & AFRICAN PIONEER. Mr Schirding of ARCM in the article SINGS THE PRAISES OF MR BIRD AND HIS KIWARA SOLD TO FQ etc. [public info ie sold for US$260m ]. Article goes on with: "INTEREST FROM BIG PLAYERS." Have a read.

XTR & GLR

Look at the map and see all Bird's 2 other co's and where they sit ie licences and where AFP sits.

KICK-OFF TIME:

FQ will hopefully report on their work at AFP ground when they next report as norm?

AFP 2023 PRESENTATION GIVES ALL THE DRILLING RESULTS PRIOR TO FIRST QUANTUM TAKING THE REMAINING 2 LICENCES FROM AFP = all 4 taken. AFP has 1 more licence NOT licenced to FQ under the agreement. DYOR, NIA.

Sat, 17 Feb 2024.

FOR AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT: I dont venture to speak on other co's from the Bird stable ie XTR or GLR at NW Zambia but suffice to say, Bird said, "1 will hit the JACKPOT". Who? That is to be seen by drilling results -Anglo about to kick off and they are a bit further from the conglomorate from what I can see but ask Mr Bird as I am not the expert on geo maps etc. I can only see the map that Bird showed. I FELT THE POINTS MADE WERE VALID AND MUST BE ANSWERED & RESEARCHED FURTHER FOR MYSELF ---each to do their own reading of the AFP 2 RNS'S on the JV with FQ and their interpretation of LEGALS. AFP MKT CAP; £ 5 . 0 2 MILLION @ 2.24P.

-----------COLIN BIRD:CHAIRMAN: HIS CO'S --XTR ---GLR ---AND AFRICAN PIONEER, ALL AT NW ZAMBIA--THE WEST FORELANDS CHASING PACK --ADD IN RIO, ANGLO, IVANHOE, FIRST QUANTUM etc [MAJORS]:-----

Mr Bird in an interview: "5 are CHASING THE WEST FORELANDS, 1 HAS TO HIT THE JACKPOT. Is that possible? That is something known - Zambia is copper rich per the Head of State etc & proven by all the majors with Sentinel, Enterprise mines etc. Who are the 5? Mr Bird has 3 CHASERS in AFP, GLR and XTR vs Anglo [JV], Ivanhoe , Rio ---vs KOBOLD [Bezos, Gates etc private co that has ALREADY HAD A BIG COPPER DISCOVERY in NW Zambia, hence the chase?

GLR FORUM:

One poster said: "My issues with the AFP side is: If FQ WALK away they will receive NOTHING upfront. 2ndly if the DECISION TO MINE happens, FQ owns 75% of the mine and finally AFP have tied themselves to FQ and FQ CAN BUY THEM OUT IF & when they chose. AFP will NOT see any money for at least 4 yrs." " Both GLR & XTR can prove up their licences & if there is anything worthwhile they can get a better deal and NOT BE RESTRICTED TO FQ." [Posted Sat, 17.2.24]

AFRICAN PIONEER:

Above are valid points and for that reason, I CHECKED THE ORIGINAL AFRICAN PIONEER [AFP] RNS OF THE OPTION DEAL WITH FIRST QUANTUM [FQ] DATED 20 Jan 2022 entitled: "ZAMBIA PROJECTS OPTION AGREEMENT."

[1] "From the table of timelines/agreement: 2 YEARS TO PREPARE A TECHNICAL REPORT ; 1ST EARN IN & 51%.

[2] "2ND EARN-IN : Complete met, development studies, public announcement DECISION TO MINE, earn in 75%.

[3] "FQ at 75%, parties have to FUND PRO-RATA, or diluted to 10% , then it converts to 1% royalty, 0.2% to minority s/h and 0.8% to co."

[4] First Earn In= JV."

----------[5] " S A L E RESTRICTION: CO NEEDS FIRST QUANTUM APPROVAL TO SELL & must give First Quantum FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL & FQ CANNOT SELL WITHOUT CONSENT OF CO."

["If FQ wants to sell their AFP shares to a 3rd party, then minority s/h can require 3rd party to buy their shares on same terms."

FACT:

[1] All the above are verbatim from the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT RNS, 20.1.23 from AFP. Yes, FQ can walk away BUT AFP RNS , FRI 16, FEB 2024 , FQ HAVE DELIVERED A NOTICE to exercise OPTIONS ON 2 OF THE OTHER LICENCES =4 in total.

"THE PARTIES AGREED 1ST EARN IN PERIOD: TECHNICAL REPORT, Indicated at least 300,000 tonnes of copper for FQ to earn 51% of agreement has been EXTENDED TO 28 FEB 2026 [1st earn in period]."

[2] "Colin Bird, AFP RNS, 16 .2.24: 2 7 7 6 7 ---&--- 2 7 7 7 1 already exercised on 23.10.23. Now , 2 7 7 7 0 & 2 7 7 6 8 also EXERCISED by FQ " [All 4 licences taken].

[3] "WORK COMPLETED DURING INTIAL PERIOD OF OPTION: SOIL SAMPLING, GROUND GEOPHYSICS-------.>>AIR CORE DRILLING--->>>>DIAMOND DRILLING in excess of the minimum $500,000 exp. on each of the 4 licences."

QUESTION:

To me, it is 2 YEARS to 28 Feb 2026 for a Technical Report by FQ as above. 2ndly, AFP ------>>>CAN SELL--->>>SEE ABOVE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF 20.1.

One last word in reply to you, Mr Banburyboy:

[1] If indeed, you lost your money, then , time to RE-ASSESS your loss. Well, tons of people have done so. Some dont ever buy stocks again, others go on to overcome their loss, OR like one chap, he had to save to recover. Each to their own.

[2] MORALITY- No there is no morality in being on this forum from EARLY hrs of the morning and your post was at 6am+ and repeating about tis and that. To save time, just go to GOOGLE FINANCE RRR and PRESS MAX --that will show the share price HISTORY of RRR. Then, ask , how come the fall ? Then, if one has the skill, overlay RRR chart with another and see. Then, look at 20 co's like RRR and find out from their Annual Reports & RNS what is the state of $ affairs and if they are all in the same boat. If not, then, free to see where is better or best.

NO, THERE IS NO MORALITY -----there are other SHAREHOLDERS in RRR and if it goes on with Gary Carp school then, it is of a disadvantage to the holders. That was why RRR took the case to the High Court as it was damaging the biz as norm. Same with other AIM co's. In Court, free to tell the Judge. Gary lost and paid out a substantial amount to RRR which was donated to charity.

SAME IN AUSTRALIA : If this was HC, the poster would be banned for defamation. One lady had to pay $50,000 she didnt have. Fair or not fair? No, it is not fair to the holders and co. Said ONCE, TWICE AND REPEATS ---Bell, Bell, Bell.

It will not be about BELL, it will be about the ASSETS GOING FORWARD. If one doesnt like what Bell has decided, get together and buy the co up and then RUN it.

SO, MORALITY IS ON OUR SIDE , MR BANBURYBOY, in the eyes of this forum and in front of God. We, have mud thrown on us as holders and dont deserve it. I feel for everyone's loss but WHO CAN EVER SAY, they have NOT lost? The game plan is to stay in the game ie investing game per RICK RULE, the legendary investor and he shares those rules. ALL FREE. dyor, nia. Sat, 17.2.24

Part 3: Last comment:

I am not a Chartered Accountant, nor a Forensic Accountant. I am not in hedge fund or fund management. I am not good at maths or accounting. I was not given the privilege of going to uni. etc.

If anyone can READ and WRITE and add 1+1= 2, then anyone can do it. Why? A American janitor ate at a cheap canteen who sold not orange juice [100%] but orange cordial and cheap food. He saved and went to the library to read Wall St Journal, etc and did his research [days of no computer]. He died a millionaire and it was on CNBC etc. In America, it is the CAN DO attitude. Dan Zanger built swimming pools and was a contracter [small one]. He could study charts until he made some serious millions and was featured on the Fortune Magazine and his tax returns had to be shown to Fortune to evidence what he said.

I used to order FREE Annual Reports, Interim Reports of large co and small one's from FT. I filled in the form ie order. Then, the postman would deliver 10-20 a time. I spend my time , not grumbling about life, its unfairness, this CEO or rhat CEO but rather, sitting on 1 pile of Annual Reports and reading them. I get red pencils to MARK, CIRCLE notes to accounts. I check assets etc. I ORDER FROM THE FT, FREE ANNUAL REPORTS OF THE LARGEST FUNDS and I read their methodology and their mode of operation ie what they allow or dont allow their mgr to do ======YES, THEY FOLLOW GUIDELINES and they discuss co 's, have research dept. I go to forums to see what they say. I work into the night to obtain everything there is to KNOW ABOUT THE ASSET vs other co's in the country, see what the legendary miners are saying, go thru the twitter accounts of co's and see what is by way of pictures of their assets. Yes, its a slough and IT IS ATTAINABLE.

Why? MONEY IS AT RISK. THAT MR BANBURYBOY is down to SELF.

YOU CONFIRMED IT NOW ---having read what I said about RRR: ASSETS MORE THAN LIABILITIES AND PROVEN BY THE ANNUAL REPORT OF RRR. FORENSIC - I can only do so much. I cannot make decisions for the co and if I dont think they are suitable for me at any moment, I can LEAVE and sell. I can take a small loss, impairment as part of the overall risk portfolio. I wont lose my savings if I DONT GAMBLE ie 1 whole lot into 1 stock waiting for it to come right. I continue to watch ALL AIM co's to see if other co's are in the SAME BOAT AS RRR. RESULT OF MY FINDINGS: YES, THEY ARE ALL IN THE SAME BOAT --funding is hard to raise and in case, news has not been taken in--OFFICIALLY IN RECESSION. Means? Even a £10k loan cannot be obtained and the rich have to go to LUXURY PAWNSHOPS --big article on that.

So, Mr Banburyboy, there you have it. It may not be pleasant but that is what I TELL MYSELF. News, you have not got this or that skill, you had better sit up and obtain that skill. But where? All free online these days. If no computer, then free computers at every library. BUT I CANNOT - well, if cannot, risk has increased in quantum lea

MY ASSESSMENT:

One that EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE DONE =============BEFORE=====THEY PUT IN £10 in this co. You, Mr Banburyboy ====CONFIRM MY ASSESSMENT STYLE COMMON TO ALL PEN PUSHERS with sharp pencils as norm.=========

NO, ON SAT, 17 FEB 2024, RRR IS NOT IN LIQUIDATION MODE. Why? Article 4 has been passed with AUTHORITY to issue IF THAT IS SO. As for charges etc - until they are registered at Companies House and FILED for the public, that is not within anyone's reasonable ability to assess until then as norm. By your own previous admission, it would appear liabilities are not and is not EXCEEDING ASSETS. SEE, MR BANBURYBOY -IN FRONT OF YOUR SUPPORTERS, YOU HAVE ADMITTED THAT THE ASSETS OF RRR ARE PROBABLY WORTH MORE but CANNOT TELL US WHICH OR HOW MUCH. Do you know or wont share. Or, you have not done a deep dive but think so? Think is not good enough ------PENCIL HAS TO BE SHARP ie the accounting pencil.

PJ

If PJ was called in like at KAT, then the Head will have to step down by industry convention. Why? To save the co in these times when capital is hard to raise. PJ can raise the capital and HE HAS --------1 single institution wanted THEIR OWN BIG ALLOCATION, not just part of the general raise. Our Consultant is not a CO DOCTOR as they call them nor known to be one. PJ appears to be a ROOT AND BRANCH MAN - he was a RISK ADJUSTOR at an insurance co and a Chartered Accountant by profession. That is his skill. HE MADE HIS FORTUNE AT RRR or rather got life's start. He was married with kids and had little and meagre savings and he said so. In 1 interview, I think he REVEALED how much was his capital ie some £12,000 range. One cant buy a new car with £12,000 for perspective.

RRR DEAD IN A YEAR'S TIME:

I dont know at this moment, Sat, 17 Feb 2024. Why? The DRC award of $10m USD will be of help and give oxygen to this co ie RRR. Then, what happens NEXT is also critical. That is not my job, remit and no one is taking my advice even if I gave it. That is right given I dont hold a major share in this co. I only have a small tiny sum as part of risk diversification. So, I can even do an impairment charge. MY LOSS: Between buying at 0.87p range and losing if it falls to 0.6p if funding is done at that but no risk if the DRC RRR US$10M comes in next week per update [IF PAID OR GOING TO BE PAID]. SIMPLE ISNT IT? SO, MY RISK IS SPELT OUT AND EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE DONE WHAT YOU HAVE NOW STATED, MR BANBURYBOY and you now confirm the HEDGE FUND METHODLOGY. OH, KDNC was told by 1 Gary, they are also done. THEY ARE STILL HERE with an iron project and Mexican govt Treasury Report stated Sonora is VALUED UP TO US$600BN. Cadence ie KDNC has engaged Clifford Chance, the LEADING counsel to engage with the MEX GOVT. Oh, KDNC was our Consultant's founding co with that 1 asset Sonora - he said M & A $400 [historical]--INDEED , GANFENG BOUGHT BCN for 70% of Sonora & the other piece for some US$260m or £260m from recall -got to re-check £ or US$. SAME

Banburyboy:

"Quote: 6:02am, Sat, 17 Feb 2024:

We have 2 perspectives:

-The Dreamers-News, Helpful & Maidit

-The realist-Tricky Ricky Dukey Zumore & me.

All reasearch is evidence & valid but the likelihood of it coming true is deemed risk.

..Balance Sheet... MAJOR RISK co wont exist IN A YEAR'S TIME. THAT IS NOT TO SAY THE ASSETS ARE NOT WORTH ANYTHING, THEY ARE ===WORTH A LOT AND PROBABLY ARE.======."

MY PRESENTATION REPLY TO BANBURYBOY AS HE NAMED ME IN PARTICULAR: THE RIGHT OF REPLY:

Your statement: From your own mouth, you stated you are a "DISGRUNTED" investor. You also said you are a ACCOUNTANT vs on the other forum, he says he is an engineer working in fund managment [both repeat the same lines ?]. It is important to know which one to take -the accountant or engineer?

YOUR OWN STATEMENTS CONFLICTS EACH OTHER --SUPPORTS MY ASSESSMENT FROM THE EVIDENCE OF THE BALANCE SHEET IE THE 3 COMPONENTS OF THE ASSETS IS MORE THAN THE LIABILITIES. You also LEGALLY QUALIFIED "WORTH A LOT ===AND PROBABLY ARE.===

ASSESSMENT OF RRR WHEN YOU INVESTED:

If you had done evidence based research on the co [deep dive detailed research], you would have CLASSED them into RED, YELLOW AND GREEN jurisdictions. That is from the Nicholas Mather playbook -Geo's have their own coding and they dont reveal it real time because that is their trade research of where is risky, not risky, not so risk etc. Colin Bird is also working on that same playbook of jurisdictional risk and so ARE THE MAJORS given it is an INDUSTRY norm.

So, today, you typed up your full and final appraisal of investors like me, Maid, Helpful vs 5 others inc you. When you first invested in RRR, IT IS NOW SEEN BY ALL , THAT YOU DID OR DID NOT DO THE TYPE OF RESEARCH YOU NOW SPELL OUT? Research as not reading articles etc BUT GETTING OUT THE ACCOUNTANT'S APPRAISAL PENCIL AND MAKE SURE IT IS SHARPENED to do ROOT & BRANCH assessment. So, you are not a layman with no FORENSIC ACCOUNTING SKILL? So, how did you in fact INVEST SO MUCH presumably until you are now A "DISGRUNTLED" Investor who has gone to the school of Gary? After a night's sleep, you no longer repeat the old Bell this and Bell that as that is avoiding ASSESSMENT.

LoL -----------by your own admission ie your own words , you have LOSE YOUR CASE, even in the Court of this forum or if in any judicial review. I research: example, can it be sold realistically ie assets of RRR and if not now, is there any potential going forward? Is there M & A and if so how much in a fire sale? The licences are classed differently in the Balance Sheet and so, it is worth RE-SELLING like Havieron of GGP [sold to GGP]? Are there any that can be farmed out? Will Bell have to bring in with a different skill set ie contacts TO IPO, sell, JV in those countries? Even Mr Bird has to use a consultancy who have the licences and legal counsels who have a standing in that country. PJ's POW has to get a high powered American contact for the gran

I saw a line running on this site that stated: "SFO charges two former Petrofac senior executives with BRIBERY."-16.2.24

RRR DRC ABITRATION

The above is positive for RRR's further case at the international arbitration tribunal - IF they can take it further once the award is made. Why? If one of the defendants is a publicly listed co, then this crackdown on imposing the bribery laws for UK listed co's means the co is more likely to settle than to have to declare it in the accounts @litigation against the co.

Next week, we will hear further as stated by RRR this week via RNS@Reach.

FROM CANADA [for you Spec99 since you may care to know what Canadians are interested in @RRR.

"JGMS , CEO.CA RRR: Adding RRR.L & POW.L to Victoria Bendigo watchlist -article also covering ECR-INCREASING NO OF EXPLORERS DRAWN TO THIS AREA."-11 Oct 2020. Link given to: Value the Market on Victoria Gold, Australia.

https://ceo.ca/rrr.l

"So why hasnt anyone checked to see what LAY DEEPER beneath the surface in the 100 yrs plus since. AFTER ALL, DRILLING UNDERGROUND is how almost all mineralisation in the Western Australia is NOW FOUND. Andrew Bell kept a KEEN EYE on the AREA from this point onwards. When the scale of the KIRKLAND Lake's success started to become clear, he WAS PRIMED TO SPRING INTO ACTION & SEIZE what he calls a once in a life time OPPORTUNITY. Bringing in PJ, the TWO MEN QUICKLY SET ABOUT PEGGING Victorian LAND where signs of HIGH GRADE, U/Ground mineralisation were strong. RRAL filed applications for 1 of the LARGEST TENEMENT HOLDINGS in the historic Victoria Goldfields area.

..most sought after gold exploration territories."

ANDREW BELL

So, he and PJ can work fast or faster than others in pegging. This is their forte as seen above. So, I provide proof that Canadians are interested in Victoria gold as seen by S2 [the legendary Bennett ] and now Southern Cross Gold at SUNDAY CREEK, NEXT DOOR TO RRR AUSTRALIASIA. Before anyone can chide me, I provided last night the Victorian Govt Natural Resources Report that KILMORE @...Creek was MINED 1ST and then only did they go to the NEXT DOOR AT SUNDAY CREEK WHEN SUFACE GOLD WAS MINED OUT. Same with Sunday Creek, it was mined out and that was the end then. However, Southern Cross Gold listed on ASX has shown it is NOT SO, and MKT CAP WENT FROM SMALL 1 DIGIT TO NOW a$103MILLION. So, it is impossible that Kilmore does not have the same mineralisation and gold as Sunday Creek since BOTH WERE TOLD MINING CENTRES, NEXT DOOR TO EACH OTHER.

Specinvestor99

Answer to your question:

[1] Yes, I do. But it is from shareholders attend. I dont just listen to 1 person. I take the 3 versions of the same AGM.

Then, to make sure, I ask if not sure on points that are their summary of what they think they heard vs what was actually said verbatim.

[2] Yes, some even post on the way home. Many do not live in London, hence one has to depend on others.

[3] In recent years, for some reason, NO ONE will share even if they attend and will not even let others know they attend.

[4] I have been searching on Twitter, on the other site [RRR] and not one soul can even say , the resolution/s were passed but one can assume it was given there is no large shareholder to oppose any resolution or article anyway.

[5] Some report on what biscuits were provided at the AGM. Or they met up before the AGM.

Yeah, I am quite dependant on the AGM outcome but not for RRR as nothing was going on that was critical.

Specinvestor99

Might as well get a bot to repeat the legal disclaimer. Canada speaking to UK ---> no common ground re: AGM's.

Specinvestor99

I am quite aware of the AGM procedure. No one wants any info that is sensitive but surely, there will be no objection answering the defendant/s ie is it just Kamoto or Gecamines & Kamoto as joint defendants. It is easier to get the award if it is a large & huge listed plc as there is no red tape to jump through with govt agencies that need signatures etc.

2ndly, I would bring the broker note IF Helpful is not at the AGM and ask about the projects as outlined and see if there has been country changes in the mining scene. Say for example, Helpful said last night, if Gold is $2,000, that would help. I am not sure if it referred to the Australian IPO or the gold projects. I am aware of the $2,000 requirment in general as that was what the Professor said at CNGR in an interview. So, little things like that to gauge where the co is going. For Solgold, top executives are willing to take conference calls as well from what I understand. Going back to the DRC arbitration, even the First Quantum case took 2 years and I have never heard of short time frames for such litigation. In speaking to the CEO of any co, one gets the sense of where the co is going. PJ said to call him anytime at POW on Twitter and he gave out his contact no. I dont call as I try to find out myself. Hence, Helpful saved me a lot of time --I am not keen on the African projects but if the exploration ground is hot property, then yes, as it can command high mkt caps like Southern Cross Gold and S2. RRR has got a mining center akin to Sunday Creek so that is what I want to know if the IPO is going ahead or PJ could take it on at his shell - the interest would be there and IPO may not be necessary then. PJ owns 49% anyway.

Anyone has an idea why whatever I type correctly turns out differently. Is it my software or this site?

I typed BIG COPPER HIT and it came out bit copper hit? I typed correction, it came out correct? Puzzled. Any help how to correct this? Thanks. The link was wrong as it missed the Sunday Roast not Roas?

TrickyDicky2

From your posting, I gather you know a bit more about exploration. Therefore, you remind me of DICKIE3TIMES on III then etc. I think you said your wife passed away and if so, I am sorry for your loss. But you seem to have changed a lot.

I think you now object to anyone posting any useful data - the projects DONT CHANGE nor has the GEOLOGY so even mths old data is relevant.

RRR FORUM ON LONDON SOUTH EAST

Since over at the other RRR forum, it is the same sentiment, would it helpful if I dont post any longer so that there is only 1 echo chamber? Or do we close down this forum by mutual consent since posting is not wanted on sharing any research or on the exploration or DRC award.

MR ANDREW BELL

There are large shareholders of this co and if we can no longer post, then there is no where else to get some data which one does not have. How is this going to go forward, I am not sure. One can see that anyone posting gets shooshed down unless it goes with dark ideas about tis or that to do with the co, CEO, Consultant etc. This is twilight zone stuff as in the real world, even Dickie3times would know there has been a VERY SEVERE BEAR MARKET IN JUNIOR EXPLORERS. Even RNS from junior miners say so esp annual reports and interims. They all cant be wrong. That is why on Twitter, it has emptied out of junior explorer investors.

Specinvestor99

Since you appear from Canada, then the way to obtain information ie strategy of the co going forward is by way of ATTENDING THE AGM. At the AGM, the normal procedure has to be carried out quickly ie voting etc. Then, after that, the CEO or Chairman will speak to investors and this is where one can engage more meaningfully. This happened with GGP ie the CEO/GEO shows some drilling data to explain etc. Even Mr Bird speaks to investors after the AGM. When the shareholders return home, they usually provide NOTES so that those who did not attend in London can benefit from the NOTES. It is obvious, NO ONE ATTENDED the RRR AGM today, 2pm in London, hence why NO NOTES AND NO ONE HAS REPORTED ANYTHING.

RRR

It is basically bottom fishing ie the mkt cap is at the very low. That is why ASSETS have to be examined more closely - to see if there is any potential Tier 1 or a project in the hot exploration area eg Sunday Creek [mkt cap of co is A$103m].

Of immediate interest is the DRC update and no one know what the outcome is yet.

JUNIOR MINING STOCKS

Very few in Britain have the skill to manage these junior exploration stocks with the type of expertise that will result in a good profit. This is NOT momentum play as there is no HUGE MASSIVE BUYS pushing momentum forward with VOLUME and LIQUIDITY for a decent rise. Why? In ordinary life, very few people are in the investment industry and are on forum and hence they lack the skills and expertise to manage their portfolios. Skill would include quite an array of knowing geology, tonnage, grades etc. UK is not a mining country as is CANADA or Australia. If one goes to Canadian forums, some fund mgrs post and in Australia, those folks know very much more since Oz is mining concentrated. Also, many geo's post. SPROTTS is very successful but they have teams of geo's , money bean counters etc and can research more indepth and provide and obtain unavailable notes and archives or govt mining archives. I note PJ has learnt even tho he is a Chartered Accountant by profession. How do I know? I read his Twitter and he does display more knowledge than the normal layman. It can be learnt ie junior exploration etc. The section has got harder as majors are only interested if a junior has a potential Tier 1 project of which they might JV but not buy these days for any bidding war.

Helpful

Thank you for your link as it was helpful to me. As I said, I do not know much about Africa except currently NW Zambia as that is quite easy to locate inc DRC [RRR's Musoni].

FORUM

This is now going to be a issue going forward. If you look at a forum like GGP or Solgold, everyone posts bits of article etc and this is NOT constituted as prompting the co but rather finding out what the projects are, the potential in order to determine fair value. When a co starts drilling, no one has an idea yet and it is only geology of the nearby that will help to obtain an insight eg Havieron is close to Newcrest Telfer and how this relates. This is a historical account and shows why everyone's contribution is helpful. If the PROJECT does NOT suit, then folks move on. ISNT THIS THE FUNCTION OF STOCK FORUMS - the reasoning is not the norm because if it is as said, then it is from MOMENTUM TRADERS who are not interested too deeply over the projects except the MOMENTUM and or charts. It is up to everyone to find out the regulations of the country any co is involved in. Zimbabwe's change came so SUDDENLY that even Premier AFrican's holders got caught out. Prices were also overnight ie the plunges and even the majors were affected. MINING is a volatile industry and those who invest all know this. In investing, one has to have a POSITIVE OUTLOOK and have the goodwill toward the co and CEO/Consultant as taught - if NOT, then just move on. Even for FT100 or FTSE co's, shocks can occur eg of the accounting type etc. But to say, that those of us who maintain a healthy outlook in life are guilty of not going with the FLOW of the CROWD THEORY --if one were to adopt that here, it will become norm and breaks every principle learnt from youth and from one's belief.

The link to the interview as above:

https://twitter.com/RoasPR/status/174213310134485470 dated 2 Jan 2024 [re-tweeted by Colin Bird, Chairman of AFP]

I listened to this interview again and make the correct of NOT 5bn but 3- 5Mt with potential of 10mt contained copper with grades of approx 1.5-2% over a tonnage of 1/2 to 1-2bn [rocks]. There is another interview but that one only mentioned AFP in part. The consultant said that Zambia [NW] is a man made border from DRC.

MAP OF NEW ZAMIA - JOINT VENTURE OF AFP & FIRST QUANTUM.

It sits on the trend of the WESTERN FORELAND coming from the DRC ie Kamoa-Kakula [Robert Friedland of Ivanhoe fame] and recently the bit copper discovery at Kitkoto, also WESTERN FORELANDS, DRC [close to Kamoa-Kakula..

Link to map: https://twitter.com/ColinBirdMining/status/1754785831649161422 dated 6 Feb 2024 [2 maps]

Comment:

The interview was mainly by the consultants who own the licences and cut the deal with AFP - what they explained was the geology of the licence and the model as norm from historical data etc.

DYOR. NIA.

Two consultants were present in the interview from Zambia [legal etc]