Abusive posts26 Oct 2020 14:39
I just want to address one point laboured by Trellis. Yes I was perhaps abusive in a couple of posts which I believe have been removed, I know they were originally (as were the blatant derampers posts) but I've not checked to see if they're back and couldn't care less tbh.
I doubt very much the kind of people I was swearing at have thin enough skins to be offended by a few asterisks. What I find offensive Trellis is the blatant lies that some are spreading in an obvious concerted effort to manipulate the shareprice. If you think it can have no effect you're a fool. Why do you think they have laws against shareprice manipulation? AIM is all about sentiment!
Furthermore I think what you're actually peeved about is not my use of a few asterisks but the fact that I called you out the other day for being so negative about this newly envigorated company and couldn't wait to have a pop back. I see you're back to your usual negative self today with a couple of very misleading posts where you couldn't even get the cash in hand figure correct or perhaps this wasn't a genuine mistake? I remember the circumstances surrounding you resigning from BAG, you were overly aggressive, obnoxious, rude, arrogant and full of your own self importance. You resigned before you were kicked off because the other leading members pretty much all the members of BAG for that matter found you unreasonable, demanding and difficult. So don't lecture me about manners, rudeness and swearing!