We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
in for 2.7 million shares GLA
Anyone able to provide their take on the webinar please? wasn't able to make it unfortunately :(
nice one Grim, agree that they shouldn;t give time frames if they are not sure they will stick to them but as DBW says, got to trust the team know what they are doing here and plenty of mid to long term reasons could show that this is not really related to alpala directly but the master plan
I see what you mean about delayed time frames Grimbergen, but, I do think this is a strategic choice and agree with CD and others that this is in the best interest of the company in terms of giving us time to increase value. For example, imagine if the PFS came out, we then got a bid for all solg based on alpala and a half baked porv and not even had a drill in Rio. Then imagine what a bidding war for solg could look like after porv is proved up further, and rio drilled and maybe even some assays back on it. It could make a huge difference to the end game. I think we have to trust NM is playing a very strategic move here and that he and the team will have thought about many different outcomes. I am sure if they wanted to get a PFS out now, then they probably could have done. The worst thing anyone could do is vote against the resolutions in my opinion.
Hi Richy
I thought the same, so as others have said, we were expecting BG news first with Barnes later on December. So I would understand that as we could get the BG assays back first, but the Barnes ones come early next year instead of lated Dec. Great news stage one is complete. Also nice to hear more mentions of those IOGs . Personally I don't mind if this takes a bit longer than expected to see a sp move . Just gives us more time to accumulate and increase future fortunes. We are all in this very early guys could be some big wins for LTHs