Member Info for MPO818

Early doors up 57% just over 100k shares dealt that will increase. Should motor, Biden positive and Southwest are huge over there.

BumbleB2 - who are you asking this question to?

How long have you watched this board?

BumbleB2
Probably because they think they can impact it, AB has raised our expectations and those of the market, no really positive progress in the coming days/weeks and this share is fcuked. Not because of this post but because of the content of that half year end report - it is that serious.

If this RobinHood crowd get involved, well you know the rest.

Coldfishpie

If you really believe that the share price of a company with over 700m shares can be impacted by comments from pi's on a BB.
you are NAIVE.

Reported less than 2 minutes ago in the FT
“As of the last trade AFC Energy PLC traded at 60.22p 36.21% Below its 52 week high of 94.40p, set on 29 December 2020”

It raised a further £36m in April 2021 and raised shareholders expectations in its half year report, forecasting multiple share price enhancing events in the second half of calendar year 2021. Shareholders wait with baited breath.

Yes - but if I remember correctly isn't it involved with Amazon, and they always deliver.

I have unmasked HAGGIS, I can confirm he is ADAM BOND he wrote late Tuesday night the following:

If there is no RNS tomorrow, then I'd fully expect the trading update RNS on Thursday or Friday, because the events scheduled in on Thursday and Friday at COP26 are not directly relevant to AFC, and therefore AB should be back at AFC HQ on Thursday.
There has not been one single posting today from him, it is therefore clear he is busily preparing the year end update and hopefully delivering on his calendar year expectations. Fully expect AFC to fly tomorrow (or Friday)

Only +37% - Why can't AFC deliver
VLS - COP26 impact of an RNS see what happens at 8am

VLS - COP26 impact of an RNS see what happens at 8am

Yes it is all getting rather tiresome.

Maybe the EXPECTED news before the calendar year end will resolve the issue for all shareholders - until then "carry on regardless "

Potential has existed in every asset ALBA (and now GROC) has ever owned, however it never gets any better. I was lucky and managed to bale on the back of the Welsh Gold Dream. No gold has been shown, despite digging for over 12 months, investors have been left dangling now that dewatering has been denied. Todays RNS is an attempt to stir interest in the Greenland graphite and it includes plans for 2022. The initial find was in 2017 and so it goes on, the sp could multibag LOWER it has before and probably will again.

SUFCESSEX
Yes, I think quite a lot did the same, but then came the pandemic, and we know what happened next. The regulator stepped in and prevented dividend payments for all banks. Just happy to get the half yearly one back. Hopefully at the y/e we may get a special to compensate.

The UK won’t join an alliance of countries fixing a date to phase out fossil fuel production, in a move that calls into question the COP26 host nation’s climate leadership.

Could todays price rise be an indication of pending news??

Haggis
"it's cash burn rate is so low"
Probably because it has not produced a product or products readily available for sale. Let's see what the accumulated losses are at 31/10/21 and the number of employees now on board. Does your employer know you spend most of your working day on this BB - your a professional "time stealer"

https://on.ft.com/30f1gZb

FCI
Good post, but in reality the only person who can really undermine the AFC share price is AB - he set the tone with his bullish expectations in the half year report on 23rd June. For Haggis to suggest there will be no news whilst AB attends COP26 is rather woeful, the year end update is a historical event (done in less than 3 days last year) and is his responsibility. Further delay will lead to negative speculation.

I suspect every AFC investor knew this - the author should have included every company in the "sector" because they are all making huge losses (AFC less so). Do these people actually get paid to write this rubbish.

"The big risk I see is that it’s hard to tell who will be successful at this early stage. AFC isn’t yet profitable, so that’s an extra risk. But it does seem to be attracting a lot of partnership interest. And it seems to have enough cash, for now."

"Also there is an option on the Tuesday 9th if AFC or a partner have a new product to announce in the area of discussion."

Surely that would be price sensitive and therefore would need to be by RNS.