Member Info for Moorscloud

Might as well ask, anybody see any possibility of things improving in the next few weeks?

Thanks for your honesty RJ - obviously our own decision what we each individually do but good to know the choices of other trusted posters. Hope you're back in much sooner than you expect :)

That would be good, thanks JohnNth. And presumably reasonable to hope/assume that with Poly back on the LSE and a divi paid - albeit perhaps less than one might have thought for a 3/4 year wait and with such a good gold price now - should indicate to the market that Poly is once again worth investing in.

...what the He1 board thinks when looking at the sp since their rnses yesterday.

Do CEOs / boards consider the likely (predictable?) effect on the sp before releasing an rns? Did they HAVE to out out those rnses? What were they wanting to achieve?

John - once again much appreciate your input. Perhaps it's not too optimistic to hope that Poly will be aware of the considerable shareholder disappointment in the sale and therefore be more attentive in the future.

Also "Looking ahead, restoration of listing on the LSE must be a priority to restore shareholder value of what remains of the business". Have there been recent comments from Poly indicating this is a priority for them?

"Think about how many Billions COVID-19 wiped off global economies."

Think too of the amounts spent on drugs by governments and how much was money was made by the drug companies. Are these numbers known?

RP - thanks for posting tweet but couldn't quite make sense of your comments...

My wife watched Lorna's brilliant interviews recently and instantly said "there's a person enjoying the attention". And so she should but a strong feeling that a month's silence will have been a l o n g time for Lorna too. There will be words soon :)

And MrI called Hemo a cult lol. But you're right JHFH, Hemo's sp is derisory because some people have ruthlessly exploited the opportunity which the need for funding presented. But the company's amazing science and potential has thereby been enabled to live on and those of us who believe in that, will still be here to benefit long after Ssccss etc are gone. Though still not sure about HT...

"Traders are already moving away or have left".

Would be interesting to know the range of the length of time traders are willing to stick with a share before they head elsewhere. There is clearly going to be a wait before He1 / Lorna deliver an important rns - be it hours or months - and the negative posters here cannot influence this any more than the positive. But it is easy to know who will wait longer :)

...designed for numpties like leematt

Not to those who'd taken part in the sounding. Wasn't that the cause and start of the attack on the sp?

Last question Digittt, promise. When was this sounding?

So leaving aside the inevitably flawed concept of soundings, why was the placing price set so low at 2p when quite clearly those in the know would know that the price would fall even lower once the placing was announced? Is there any possible answer that doesn't reflect badly on Vlad and his financial advisors?

Thanks Ssccss. Before I plough through that, does it matter that Hemo is not AIM or am I looking at the wrong part?

From that:

Core Principle 1 – Market Integrity

Market Sounding Intermediaries will be required to ensure the confidentiality of and not trade on or use any non-public information passed or received during market soundings for their own or others’ benefit or financial advantage until the information ceases to be non-public".

Seems pretty clear from the sp collapse that such informed trading was exactly what happened after the clinical hold rns.

Failing to find anything in England about soundings but in Hong Kong they seem to be more concerned about the practise if this is of any interest:

https://www.charltonslaw.com/sfc-consults-on-market-sounding-guidelines/

Appreciate your insight Digittt, even more if you would answer those questions...

Subush - entitled to your opinion of course but that's one hell of an accusation - and one I personally can't go with.

Won't surprise anyone I didn't even know soundings existed until last few days. But I do now and have a much clearer picture of exactly how unfair they are on those not in the know and how inevitable the next period will be for the share, just as Digitt has clearly and very helpfully explained. So if I may, does a sounding always result in a placing amount that accords with the sound, or is it genuinely a testing of the waters? Who gets "sounded"? How can ordinary excluded investors find out a sounding has happened? And sorry for petulant naivete but in what world is this fair on those kept in the dark?

Thoughtful and reflective board today - much appreciated while licking wounds after the shocking placing. Disturbing too to have to realise that there must have been some dipping into this board who knew exactly what was going to happen but kept quiet because they - presumably rightly - felt it was in their interests for us cannon fodder to remain in the dark. This is not a criticism, it's a realisation that Reg was absolutely right - this is not a gentlemen's club - and we have to take complete responsibility for our own investment and have no right to expect others to let us benefit from their experience and knowledge - but we should be very grateful to those that do.

All that said, I'm not sure why Ssccss feels this need to sprinkle his undoudtedly wise - if somewhat patronising - words with unnecessarily snide attacks on the company and its amazing science which I somewhat doubt he has the knowledge to question: it almost feels as if his real agenda is to try to make sure the sp does not rise at this point.