The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
Granty, what was the hazard against which the treasury shares insured, iyo?
Sterr & accip, this abuse could be cured if staff cleared tables sooner. You often go in to find used glasses, half-eaten plates of food (why do they order so much, smaller dishes available?) and, yes, beverage mugs that could be re-used fraudulently. Some of this is idle staff, more is bad management; but for profit reasons the staffing can be very thin, as the margins are thin. It's a fine line, what makes more profit, stopping beverage fiddles or a lean wage bill?
However, customers who might leave a chunk of cash behind would be attracted by clear clean tables and rapid bar service. A recent experience was of 3 bodies behind the bar only 1 of which served live customers, the others doing online orders stocktaking and clerical functions. Trade was light but it only took a complex food order to cause a big delay. Only customers with possession of their order are actually making us profit, until then they just use space for no return.
Sterr, a token system would require staff time. I think the reason for refills at all is that serve-yourself is cheaper than employing to serve.
Should have bought a load more when cheap: cancelled them too.
Only have 3 words for your "polls": 2 of them are "your" & "polls".
CT5, not all of those "buys" really are, including a sell of mine. Imo since 12:20 all "buys" u24.8p are sells. Still, it's on its way up, folks need to take profit someday, else only the grandkids benefit (&I hope they do too).
Heid, to repeat her denunciation? It's all true, silly moo, just take it easy.
This may become a sad day, where posts exceed trades. Condense, or précis your posts, reply to more than one person per post. Especially, TRADE MORE.
And she's got us all talking about her, which can only feed the condition.
CT5, agree, particularly the ludicrous "polls".
In defence, it's all honest, what you see is what you get. Irritating yes, but nothing to incline you to take it seriously. The manipulative hidden agendas are the problem, which she ain't.
Did the Fawlty Towers doctor comment, "enough material for a conference here", or am I too becoming delusional?
JOkin, but are the recent sells real sells? The 1310 & 1312 sells are real, might folks be buying below the midpoint? As usual, we shall discover truth as soon as it's too late to profit from it.
Heid, damn your "poll".
CT5, thing is, the BoD can decide on a dividend, decide how much it shall be. Sp goes wherever, as seen recently. In a perfect market SPs would order themselves to give equal % dividend returns, but reality is different. If we could get a good regular % return, the buyers attracted might get you the desired sp too.
Karin thanks for post, but until admin deals with it, you can't get a proper discussion.
Own slightly more of jdw than they did a couple of days ago. That must account for the soaring quarter-percent rise. If you know better do say.
"I speak just as I see things". So do most of us, just not so incessantly.
Up to 58¢ today, was 42¢ recently and over 80¢ a few months back. Accustem aside, wtf is going on here, anyone?
Nighti, absolutely!
CT5 & JOkin, I'd rather both. On a moral plane, if only 1 possible, divi is better than trading profit imo. Divi is organic, fresh wealth created by the company's successful endeavour: while those who profit by trading (& I do) do so only on the proceeds of other mugs' losses; not new capital creation. Then, if we had strict ethics would we be here?
Moreover, you can only make trading profits when you dump the company, wholly or partly. Divi keeps you a member; you can stick with a company you like and still get cash.
While s/he posted at opening, this might be the sort of day on which Pboo chooses not to comment. Go on! Prove me wrong.
While s/he posted at opening, this might be the sort of day on which Pboo chooses not to comment. Go on! Prove me wrong.
Heid, that's where commas go, within sentences. Try them, why not? Break up your dull prose, enable subordinate clauses? One hint; avoid at the start or end of sentences, where different conventions apply.
Quite score, this company had been disastrous for LTIs, but seriously good for those who trade spikes and dips. I have a little.
Karin my assumption is that the 21.00 & above are true buys, 20.81 (one of which is mine) & below true sells.
Hi Micky, sorry if it should be obvious, but please explain the meaning and relevance of this post and link. (I have scoured the photos but can see no sign of Mrs W's van or famous outdoor khazi.)
Anyway, good if you've cheered up a bit.