Hopefully the option of “Hold but allowed to complain about the SP drop and the lack of a Podcast by KM/comms from the BOD” also exists?
Otherwise I’ve got a bigger problem than I thought as it would appear that I’ve invested along with other investors who don’t care what the SP/MCAP performance is or how little communication they receive about it whereas I’m aspiring to make some money and I expect to hear regular updates from the BOD. GLA
Compared to the past values accredited to BCN and Yangibana and EMH and Greenland and our SP back then when we hadn’t heard of Amapa of LT/LS that kind of price (£10/20m to “take it off our hands”) smacks of desperation, EV.
What could have been contributing to our previous MCAP which was multiples of today’s?
Tuesday will be 2 months since the last Podcast of 29th July The SP was 28.5p on 29th July It is 18.25p right now. The result is that the derampers, disillusioned and despairing are not easy to distinguish. If anyone on here is absolutely unperturbed by the drop and the lack of a Podcast or some other form of update then they are made of stronger stuff than I am! BTW - I’m in the “despairing” category.
EVBull and those who seem resolutely positive thinkers Thanks for your posts! GLA
Degsie LTHs were also “made aware of the potential” of Sonora and Yangibana years ago and although we have been “made aware of the potential of Amapa” I don’t consider “6 WEEKS” since the last podcast to be sufficient comms especially when the SP has been on a persistent decline since with no reason given.
Bannor I hope that you are wrong
Observer and EVBull Surely any legal/court or any other progress would be notifiable, more or less immediately?
Podcast interviews appear to be simple and cheap to arrange and perform/conduct and should therefore be conducted more frequently IMO. I don’t buy the theory that if there is nothing to report none are necessary because how can there be nothing to say when the MCAP has altered so much since the last podcast? GLA
Thanks for taking the time to respond, Cartune but... “Shares often drift when there’s no new news....”
That would be the simplest thing in the world of shares to rectify.........don’t allow long gaps with “no new news”. Doesn’t have to rock the world or perform positive or negative gravitytropism or whatever the word is, all it has to do is to inform the shareholders - and in these days of remote interviews it would really be the simplest, hassle-free thing to do. GLA
Cartune I truly wish I understood any of that or why our SP has been on a decline for as long as I have been buying shares here (with a few rises for the jammy 3p entrants and other post-dip rises) or what’s what. So much potential apparently if you read the calculations by some of our more energetic researchers and yet so little energy.
We need some energetic interviews of our erstwhile KM who performs well, just not often enough IMHO when the SP could do with some explanation. GLA Make mine a double
Who knows? Wish I did. I cannot even find that trade and if I could I would probably attempt attaining a higher level of confusion for myself. Any sensible ideas/excuses/reasons for the drop of 9+% which outstrips that of the FTSEs’ A formal interview with KM would be useful whatever the reason. GLA
Observer If your ‘Sat post received 15 recs” before imagine how many it will receive if you remind us of whatever it was you posted, and perhaps you could tag in whatever updates you have calculated/prices which have changed since, please? Thanks GLA
I don’t think that the SP moves because of this board (or the posts on here) but I do think that posters do and although the “filterers” have possibly filtered me as well so will not be able to read my post I will reiterate: Filtering posters may give some personal feeling of accomplishment (and everyone should do what they prefer to do) but the posts remain on the board to put others off.
Anyone looking in to research this/a company will be confronted with pages of posts from people who are obviously unhappy with the company and directing personal comments towards people who are supposedly/apparently not reading their comments.
Doesn’t it accomplish more if one skips the posts from posters one doesn’t want to read, or reads all posts and report those which warrant reporting? Some of the personal comments run from unwarranted to disgraceful and IMHO they warrant reporting.
I’m amazed that there are apparently some who have 80 and 100 filtered posters! Just on Cadence or across all boards? I was not aware that we even had 100 posters, even giving a head count for each multi-alias poster. That would imply that the majority of KDNC shareholders posted on here.
Also, how does anyone have the willpower to not have a sneaky peak at the posts before logging in? GLA
Despite the best efforts of the Fors and the Againsts and those who prefer no interviews by KM who gives very good interviews, and the no debate and whatsoever group, the SP looks like a very small oooh is called for. GLA
When did we last have a “publically available analyst report linked on KDNC website”?? Even the last one which was not freely available was years ago, I think?
IMHO Absolutely no need to wait until we get Amapa sorted because we could have had a few in the intervening years. It’s not like we want to discount or ignore our other assets (which seem to be the talk of the boards lately due to movement)
KM needs to do an interview himself - and correct the discrepancies whether they be $660/$600m, tailings/iron ore stockpile, percentage holding of EMH or the colours of the Yangibana mining map/our ownership and it is also not necessary to wait until Amapa is sorted for the same reasons as there is nothing wrong with him just saying that negotiations are on-going there. He does interviews very well, just not often enough. If we are playing chess all the pieces on the board count all the time. GLA
My understanding is that there is a big difference in value between “tailings” and “iron ore” and unfortunately it is not the first time they have been called “tailings”. Pity KM didn’t correct the slip up the first time. GLA
Altho I agree that anyone who wants to use the filter button should do so, I do not agree that without the filter button genuine posters would be driven away because hardly on here anyone claims to filter posters. I cannot be the only one who thinks that it is of varying degrees of interest to see what everyone is writing, from the well-researched shareholders who genuinely only want the SP to improve to those with alternate agendas which I won’t pretend to understand and everyone inbetween.
How can it improve “this board” when only about 2 posters filter others? The posts are still on the board for all to read, ignore, or take with a pinch of salt.
Listened to the podcast - still calling the stockpile tailings and EMH holding didn’t sound correct. We actually need KM to be interviewed because he knows best IMHO GLA