Member Info for mick88

Aye OK it is a monster machine and will produce MONSTER production. Back of *** packet calcs gives a 5.8 fold increase in production from 2021 (113kg platinum concentrate) and a 3.3 fold increase on this years production. Now that is some progress in its own right achieved in under a year.
I must admit was pleased with the first read of the RNS this morning, and on reflection I am even more pleased now...GLA

Good find IB, things could move rapidly in the EU over the next 6 months. No time to be an outsider looking in....GLA

Good observation starf. What's the point of higher education training / teaching if there is not jobs at the end of it. And these courses no doubt will not be a few weeks duration, more like a few years , which would tie in with the timeline for the first (hopefully of many) lithium mines.

Excellent update.....and we can still accumulate at rock bottom so....what a great early Christmas present....GLA

O ye of little faith tsiblis. My opinion, the deadline was originally so tight, that it must have already been a 'done deal'. Why else would they have RNS'd it, nothing to gain otherwise. Announcement coming ....GLA

And as we have no formal ties via offtake or any other commitment to third parties (shareholdings etc), our destiny is in our own hands. We should be in an ideal position, to advance the project to production after EIA approval. My only worry with such a low share price, is that someone will come in with a low-ball offer as was the case with BCN.
On the upside is the large holding of current (and previous) Directors and the fact that our largest individual shareholder, AL MARJAN LTD (AML) purchased the majority of their holdings around the 2p mark. Surely there is no way either will sacrifice big future paydays for short term gain. In particular AML have been a long term investor and supporter (from 2015) and could have doubled their initial investments when SAV was over 4p. But they didn't, which gives the impression they would not entertain any low ball offer and would only consider decent multiples of the current SP. And of course, Directors are human, so surely they like us would want to maximize their profit (and reputation) by either a windfall sale or even better taking this to production..... GLA

Skelly85, to clarify my train of thought - Czech was only shortlisted by VW, and if they were informed there was no LI available, a good reason to re-assess. And yes I did mean it was EMH that had finalised their plans, but with a caveat that contracts were being reviewed / assessed internally prior to release. For me, the timing of the VW decision to delay is significant, and the reasons they have given (energy price) is a bit thin considering they have previously announced EU factories? In addition, it just feels right.... ;-)
Anyway, conjecture all in my opinion....GLA

Just maybe VW realized, or were informed there was no Cinovec LI for them....just maybe the resultant change of plan. All good for me as this would indicate plans are made, contracts finalised, and endvgame reviews circulating....GLA

LTH's post on this board. Most are gamers that are ramping, deramping, buying, selling for a few pennies here and there. Or else just weirdo's that think they are operating in the real world....lol
Me, I'm happy to hold a coupe of hundred thousand shares until the end game, whatever that might be. I made my choice based on fundamentals (without a war), those haven't changed. No war goes on forever, and if the basics are the same, then I'll still be here to benefit. If you are not happy with the progress of your investment, don't you just sell up and move on? Anyone on here whinging day in day out cannot be a current shareholder without an agenda, otherwise they would just move on, wouldn't they?

Well, this is working out fine for me, accumulating monthly at great prices.....GLA

wasar, to be honest, unless the individuals intention is just to play the game, the short term SP is neither here not there. My opinion, you make an investment choice, set your position, and wait on your plan coming to fruition. And if you are lucky enough (and still feel confident in your choice), take advantage of the dips. If you don't like what you see at any point, move on.....quite simple really.

So sorry for your situation army, I went over the top on a single 'punt' a few years ago and still playing catch up now. The company was 'acquired' as they call it, and all previous 25k shareholders were dumped. And to make matters worse, one of the perpetrators of this steal was the home Government of this company.
While I sympathies, I do not see what choice the BOD have to be honest. They not only want the best for their shareholders, but also the best for themselves. If this means closing up shop until the war has been resolved, then so be it in my book. Rather that than loosing the lot, like what previously happened to me. If it just means a longer timescale, then we've just got to live with it, or get out (with losses for a lot of us).

KoC, so the publicity is not a talking point. Good or Bad?

Yes...as I noted CALLs, but no comments to keep it to the fore.

Isn't it funny how a really interesting post such as this receives little attention, it's as if people just want this to disappear off the headline.
Well done Chrys for at least bring it to my humble attention(and 30 other recc's).

The Bidens bet a winner (again), and Trump bet a loser (again)
GLA actual holders

Thanks Cadellin if this was meant to answer my query....but it doesn't really. The reference to Tin recovery on the link is to a pilot project in 1970 and no doubt bares little resemblance to the new flow sheet?

Help pls, all you experts - all seems good and positive in this RNS, except I don't recall seeing any reference to tin credits? Is it possible that we lose this potential with the change to flow sheet?
My understanding is that the main changes are in the middle section of processing, and that tin separation was at the start of the process, would this be correct?

Quite simple IMO ghin, EMH are doing something outwith the JV. And what is next door just across the border in German jurisdiction.....Zinnwald Lithium. Now wouldn't that be an interesting scenario, EMH bring another 15k /t of hydroxide to the table in their own right (separate from Geomet / CEZ). Could a merger of EMH / ZNWD really be on the cards, after all both SP have followed a similar pattern over the last while (not that it would be manipulated.... ;-D)?

I believe there needs to be cross border agreement when planning things like mining in close proximity of neighbouring countries.
Wasn't there an issue with Spain/Portugal for the SAV mine?