We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
The price of Ethereum climbed more than 5% on Wednesday after the demand for the cryptocurrency reportedly grew.
According to data from Santiment, 94,700 new wallets were created on the Ethereum network on Tuesday, the most in the past four months.
Ethereum rallied 5.13% to $2,033.6596 at 8:47 am ET. Meanwhile, the world's most widespread digital currency, Bitcoin, added 2.25% to go for $36,560.03 at the same time.
Binance isn't FCA regulated, and as I posted yesterday Santander are using Swiss regulation.
More than one way to skin a cat and the UK needs to get in on the act or be left behind by other territories.
Until recently I was using Gate.io but they are now restricting UK clients so move my crypto off their site.
Be nice to get FCA accreditation but for me it's not the end of the world if we don't.
Big banks getting in on the act:
Santander Private Banking International, a unit belonging to Banco Santander SA, will be offering the exchange of major cryptocurrencies, bitcoin and ethereum, to Swiss clients, CoinDesk reported on Monday citing an internal announcement it obtained.
In the announcement, it was mentioned that Santander will be introducing more cryptocurrencies that are in line with the bank's screening norms in the upcoming months. However, these services will only be available to clients once they have sent a request through relationship managers.
"The Swiss regulation related to digital assets is one of the first and most advanced in the world, since it provides clarity and a comprehensive regulatory environment for our clients. As holding of crypto as an alternative asset class continues to expand, we expect that our clients prefer to rely on their existing financial institutions to be responsible for their assets," John Whelan, head of crypto and digital assets at Santander, shared in an email to CoinBase.
Don't you see Mr I Thicko, that the judgement provides safety for EUA and Q&M? if someone came later after Q&M or EUA saying they owned the certificates, there is a court judgement that Q&M made reasonable attempts to find the owner of the lost certs (which have been struck off the register anyway).
If someone else does claim to own the certificates then they need to challenge Q&M for ownership and the issue of the new certs. Not EUA's problem anymore.
No one is more blind than those who choose not to seeeeee ya!
OMG Mr Y fonts. Providing indemnity insurance for the company is the ONLY way new certs would have been issued prior to this judgement. NO company should provide replacement certs without indemnity.
Clearly you are clutching at straws that somehow this case is not resolved. Not related to the witch are you? Refuse to see the wood for the trees all you like. Most can see that this is now resolved. Just the WUP to sort out but this looks like a storm in a teacup.
Can't be bothered with you any further Mr Y Troll.