Member Info for licker

If they can't entice the sellers no matter they are what other options have they got? They can't take the shares off people

Lots of tails wagging this morning!

I.thought it may have given insight on free float stickiness the shirts need to buy from

Hull

Do you really think.moulding will keep.lusted without his golden share post September and open himself to all.that.

Put yourself in his shoes and think for a minute . It's simply not happening this is leaving LSE forever.

Well if we do need an action group to physically make our presence known ill be down there stood right behind oke

....wait

Look it up.yourself. its defined under fiduciary duty. Its under stature companies act supported by case law also.

Come back when you've read up.

Thanks

Knk

That's his job. His legal duty.

What's your point?

If i can yes but may have too.late now

Moulding has a conflict of interest here which must be managed.

He personally benefits from a cheap buy out if he rolls along with close IIs friends family staff

The exiting PIs and IIs want max price or an offer to stay in

He has stated 250p fair value a year ago when big headwinds existed for the business. He stated 170 significantly undervalued it

How will be manage this conflict transparently with independence to his own interests, deliver his fiduciary legal duty deliver previous expectations set, deliver value justifying reason to turn down 170p

It's a complex one and he must deliver his duties or he will be in a royal legal mess and trash his reputation as a trusted CEO for investors

Moulding had a legal duty to us to maximise value NOT to get it over the line fur the rolling investors

Given all he has said 250 is clearly his starting price

His reputation will.be appalling if ontop of dire trading updates vs target he floated a business at 500p did a crap job and bought it back for 200p.

He will annoy alot of heavyweights soome failure that!! Wont be end of story as breach of fiduciary duty claims after his deep pockets

All the talk using 65p iplus 100%s garbage

The selling PIs and IIs who the buyers and rolling IIs want to strike a bargain with are very clear the huge discount to fair value is due to a fraudulent short attack.

The unwinding of this attack needs to be factored in then we can start talking fair value whch is 250p to 300p.range. anything less don't bother wasting time.

All the talkis what appollo will offer and moulding accept. He has a fiduciary duty towards us.

Fair value is NOT as low and 65p plus 100%
Moulding and the board said this, peers comparators show this, recent other deals show this, liberium said this, FT said this, pre short attack values show this

There is zero chance of such a low bid getting off the line.

It would just be total.waste of everyone's time

Totally agree. Hard squeeze let the sp rise to a normal level then use that as the base to start negotiating. The sp is a very low false value at the moment and is unsafe to use as a base for premium discussions

200p ain't good for us though!

It's a no from me

Meant stop-loss warning

Be careful with those stop losses chaps. If nobody selling the market makers may swoop to grab them to generate stock for the shorts to close and ling buy orders. Seen it few times lightning drop to grab them to fulfill long orders or shirt closures just to create liquidity and earn their fees and spreads

Didnt realise apollo guys were ex Drexel Lambert Burnham

Read Den of Thieves its a brilliant book

He bought 26m last bid. Is he still in?