Member Info for KNIGELK

For the record, I think some of the stuff non holders come up with are way off the mark. Of course Doug is not Aiden. Were they get this stuff from is beyond me.. When people do research (mostly the non holders) I don't just take their word for it - some of it appears accurate - some of it is probably definitely barking up the wrong tree... at the end of the day - the only thing that matters is company news imho .. all the noise is just that .. noise..

What precisely do you want admin to check?? Perhaps they should check some of the rampers on here at the same time? What a daft thing to say - even for a new poster! As an ex holder - who has been on LSE for 6-7 years and posted on probably 200 plus companies - I have NOTHING to hide - just a plain old small time private investor - ok? Not sure if some here have agendas - or are members of the directors/team - or are just here as holders - ex holders - or just interesting in the unique story. I don't want anyone to lose money - I just don't understand why people continue to believe all the promises - some have happen - but to achieve 10 deals you are going to either have to issue a lot of shares - CLNs - or promises to pay in bits for years to come - I really don't see Whetstone being much different to any other investment company - but happy to be proved wrong

Didn't the British Land update show the company has been taking a hit due to retail closures etc? The company might well decide to be pro-active and renegotiate better terms - rather than end up with countless empty properties in 2-3 years time... also remember Debenhams do have a number of stores were leases end within five years - obvioiusly though will not help the current position... btw surely the share price is due a rise .. even if only 0.1p !

BTW you will find that most of the posters commenting on the AE update are actually shareholders!! Do'h

Gopies, if you haven't noticed, what has happened here - both good and bad - is unique - worth discussing - whether you are a holder or not!!!! If you want LSE to only allow holders to post on a thread - only to have 100% bullish comment - whatever news comes out - ask admin.
If you want to hear both sides of the argument - especially as this is the point of LSE - to discuss (!!!) - to assist in deciding whether to buy-hold-sell - then continue to read the thread - but all posters have a life.. it doesn't take a minute to post you know!

Are you stupid - or wish to be banned? You don't even provide the reason for apparent misleading ..

Thanks Picto - I hope you were not refreshing the web page all evening!
Very long .. and quite shocking about the FCA .. it does seem like they have the loaded gun and are a law unto themselves... Hopefully shareholders will get an update on another deal soon .. it must be due...

Sorry, you can't make statements like that without proof/evidence... you have not even stated what is misleading!

Well if it is a new investor(s) I doubt MA will be able to do a thing about it ... unless he makes a bid

You are probably right .. I use LSE as one part of my research and do enjoy (usually) the opinions of other posters on shares I hold/held or might invest in. You get to know the regulars but you can get too attached to a share sometimes.
Debenhams is VERY interesting at the moment - so much is going against the company at the moment - and the retail sector.. the next update will be vital in working out if the measures the company are taking might work gl

Might be worth reading The Sunday TImes today - article on insurers removing credit insurance/changing the terms ie. upfront payments - not read the full article but will not help the share price tomorrow!
BTW of course there are negative posts - I don't know if some of you have been on LSE long .. but as someone who has been on LSE for seven years, I have seen hundreds of negative posts. I will give examples 1) personal posts 2) posts attacking a poster by quoting old comments 3) misleading information 4) comments like "this will go bust tomorrow" 5) share price is 10p and a poster says the shares are worthless - with or without a reason.
Final point - if we use your logic - there are no positive posts either! So what are LSE posts then? Balanced? Useful?
What description would you use??

I would question the logic .. simply because I doubt any one will buy .. or sell .. a share on the comments on a BB! If they do - they should not be investing. The reason the share price went down yesterday is simple .. a RNS was not well received .. it had nothing to do with derampers appearing .. although rampers/derampers can contribute towards sentiment..

buyishello, you only starting posting yesterday - on a down day - so don't pretend derampers have the same type of agendas as rampers. MOS was probably oversold yesterday - hence the slight recovery today. There is no point to read anything else into this - I have seen no comments on twitter - and if you don't have a position, no need to worry yourself!

As part of the agreement to extend the facility, Minoan has agreed to issue 1,765,733 warrants to subscribe for ordinary shares in the Company (the "Warrants") in the name of Silja Investments Limited, a subsidiary of Zachary. The Warrants are exercisable at 6p per share and will expire on 10 July 2022.
Strange - I must be reading a different RNS.. not a discount at all to the current share price ... and not that many new warrants/shares either. Companies roll over loans all the time - I am in several investments that have rolled over their loans. OK - not great, not if the sale goes though in the next 2-3 weeks and this loan is repaid - then this issue will be quickly forgotten..

Amtech - I really cannot see the difference sorry. MOS is raising funds due to overheads being more than revenue - also to fund agreements and development plus obviously wages.... Oil companies like UKOG raise money as they have no revenue just overheads - they hope to find oil or if they have already found oil .. then they need funds to explode and develop - which can take years!
The reason anyone invests in AIM shares or high risk shares that issue shares several times a year is that they a) see an end goal - we can definitely debate this re MOS and b) they see a trading opportunity.. ie. if MOS drops much further, I can guarantee the P&D crew will arrive and an quick 50% MIGHT be made...

The Lifestyle Vehicle comment is a tad unfair imho. Literally hundreds of companies on AIM and elsewhere issue shares several times per year for various reasons - funding, development, growth, cash flow or agreements - MOS is not an exception. Also at least this company has revenue - some of the AIM companies I can think of promise great things - oil fields etc - but have no current revenue. So still a chance of success here but it is time for the management to pull their fingers out..

Well we know that the loss is LOWER than the previous year as overheads have been cut. The company has been proactive setting up new agreements but obviously revenue needs to increase!
I guess the drop relates more to the fact the cash position suggests another share issue later this year.

Thanks for the update - the revenue is so precise .. maybe they should add the cents :-)
Yes more shares in issue - I guess the question for RAP is whether the share issues have now ended ..
Glad to hear you are so chilled in this heatwave - I guess you have 100 fans on the go?

Hard to disagree... lets look back two years .. the accounts were complex .. there were loads of outstanding issues ... fast forward two years ... we have less debt .. as it was brought back at sharp discounts .. we have court cases resolved .. we have claims in the works .. we have monies due .. OK not all good news .. more shares in issue .. but no one can say that the BoD have not been pro-active. Also it is not their fault that the share attracts too many P&D merchants.. the company does not control the share price!

Of course the sector will continue! We are not about to all stop buying clothes and walk around naked! I agree the high street will become smaller and specialised but anyone over 40 will probably still wish to go out shopping occasionally so that gets us to 2060 before perhaps everything you cannot eat/drink is online or shops just have holograms of clothes and robots do the job of service (heavens forbid)... As for Debenhams itself - a lot depends on the government giving a level playing field with online re business rates etc. Also close 10-20 of the loss making stores - speed up the online services - mix up what is in their stores and have smaller shops. Do all of this and they will get though this - just like before in the 1980s and 1990s etc...