ODX DHSC dispute update3 Aug 2023 09:05
Dispute with the DHSC
As announced on 10 December 2021, the Group is in dispute with the DHSC regarding the potential repayment of a pre-production payment of £2.5 million (net of VAT). The Board, having taken legal advice, does not believe that the Group is required to repay the pre-production payment and considers that it is entitled to recover additional losses in connection with the contract. The legal costs associated with the dispute have been expensed and, with no production volume over which the pre-production payment can be recovered as envisaged in the contract, the Group still retains a deferred income balance of £2.5 million pending resolution of the dispute.
Whilst the Company sought to develop a COVID-19 test for commercial, non-governmental purposes, this was entirely separate from the operation of the contract with DHSC, which was for the manufacture - and not development - of tests and required DHSC to confirm which test was to be manufactured through the licensing of rights. There is no reference to the development of the Group's own test anywhere in the contract, whereas the contract specifically deals with the licensing of intellectual property rights by the DHSC once an appropriate agreement has been entered into between the DHSC and a third-party test developer. Despite repeated requests over the last 18 months, the DHSC have yet to provide any information regarding the licencing of rights.
Following a protracted series of correspondence throughout 2022, on 26 April 2023 the Group met with a mediator and representatives of DHSC to attempt to resolve the dispute. Following mediation, the Board are increasingly confident that the Company is in a strong position and that the pre-production payment will not need to be repaid. Furthermore, the Company intends to pursue its counterclaim to seek to recover additional losses incurred in connection with the contract.
The mediation was paused to allow DHSC to re-assess their position in the light of the evidence provided by the Group. As a consequence, the Board is increasingly confident that the DHSC's claim has no merit and will not succeed. The Board now intends to vigorously pursue its substantial counterclaim for losses incurred as a result of the DHSC's failure to licence the necessary intellectual property to permit the contract to move forward and their failure to notify the Group of their inability to do so in a timely manner.