RE: Not so Fake21 Jan 2022 17:54
Blue83 hi , I could have written article , I knew about the field safety notices I monitor them.
What I posted yesterday 100 % disproved that element of the ' article '. As to the rest ? The supposed rushed through validation actually portrays the NHS in a bad light and they deny it anyway.
If I was a disgruntled ex employee I'd spill some beans. The LFt was delayed because...
Promate because......
Graham went because....
Ajan went because....
The fact imo they can't means that there is no internal whistleblower, it is a 'shareholder '
The whole article could have been penned by me in five mins if I was so inclined. Regurgitate the dispute , concoct the one gene issue , discuss Grahams bonus , question Ajans past ( employed by Roche amongst many others) and then throw in a rushed validation claim for good measure.
I'd stake my life the said disgruntled shareholder has contacted company to ask if they have anything to say.