RE: Claim24 May 2022 18:53
We all await details. Nobody else appears to have had a problem with the Q instruments nor using our assays on them, same with Promate. We don't know why GM supplied further Promate when phase one hadn't been fully paid up , nor why months later the DHSC raised another contract to order another 4.4m of the product. All we know is it works as multiple other companies use it too. Did GM think by supplying the 40mm of Promate it triggered phase 2 , was the 40 million quids worth of Promate at cost ? We just do not know. All we know is the claim will be nowhere near in amt value to what the DHSC are claiming , with the multiple offsets. Yes of course we wouldn't be sitting in the gutter if the dispute hadn't happened , no one would have an issue with GM's bonus and I for one would be holding a substantially reduced position because I'd have reached my figure of 14 / 15 which seemed easily achievable.
Think we are all sick of this but I have an option to sell if I see a better opportunity , put simply I don't.