We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Appears to be a contentious topic, but that's my take too, any competition and servicing a loan goes up in smoke. The Atlantic Wolff may be delayed, however it only delays the inevitable by the same timeframe. It's a wait and watch and we're all well versed in that particular skill set , called investing in Harl.
It's the title of a song Amers , just banter 😆
LSE 15.13 post.
Please post when located, the copious volume of questions that Kevan Jones will ask about this latest award to BAbçock. I assume I will be waiting until the 12th of never whilst he formulates the list.
Well done Babçock.
If they are confident of a win, they have set a low bar for the LTIP, almost impossible to fail with the funds they would have for bolt on acquisitions.
We've already seen the impact of LTIP's on this share. I would have preferred a higher target. Nobody here wants to sit for three years with a target of 1.38. I appreciate that's a minimum, but not impressed.
My issue is the 3 monthly auction on the site I looked at.
Hear some bad news and you place your sell order and sit watching 300 / 599 sells and no buys for 3 months and then what ? Wouldn't touch it with a bargepole.
Hi Amers , no nightmares about the case, I'm confident with what I know, but been bitten on the xxxx by this before 😁
I'm pleased by the latest development, bring it on , we've all waited long enough.
I too think it is pivotal Neil.
Well she doesn't appear to be heading back to where she set off from. Progress appears slow, unless I'm misunderstanding.
Will she rest up or just keep going? Dependent on crew ?
No knowledge of this stuff. How far can she travel without refuelling ?
CS , you posted 20/4 13.25...
'It was just the change in wording that was not only a surprise but very welcome.'
It was what they wrote in relation to the application for summary judgement, that took us all by suprise. It was strongly worded and they are confident it will be dismissed.
Now as the burden of proof lies with the DHSC , Novacyt must be feeling very confident to issue that statement.
I expected to see share price volatility until approx a week before the trial commenced.
My question, to which I don't know the answer is..
Do we collectively feel that the DHSC are using this as a test case to determine whether to go to full trial , if it was a minor point, why bother, is it tactical because Ncyt have to respond and therefore they will know before full trial how Novacyt intends to contest the issue in question ?
Furthermore does anyone view this as a critical turning point and potentially think any ruling will be indicative of final outcome or alternatively negotiations to settle to begin in earnest. Whilst I fully appreciate that non of us are aware what the application concerns , there must be a motive behind proceeding in such a fashion.
The survey you refer to is now over a year old. It has been surpassed by any experts worth their salt ( imo ) by HN51 in prime position.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/juanlama_study-shows-experts-rate-influenza-as-the-activity-7187657196287995904-zHXp?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android