Member Info for JoubertDuquense

The irony.
1. The discussion was past tense, that by its nature is historic. And...
2. The discussion was never JPM exclusive because when they were declared short so were others. But you wouldn't know that is your ignorance. Personally i do not why you wouldn't visit the other site and check it out. But we all make our own decisions and no one should be spoon fed. Check, double check all available information no?

No you did not Culepepper. You refused to take a look at the information that has been shared on the other site regarding short positions, plural. Further, you have not (it appears) gone to the source. No one said it was secret apart from you!

That being said with respect to JPM you may well be right.

Culepepper has a lot of time on his hands and likes to talk a lot. Ppl who talk a lot end up diluting what they say because of their repetition. When some speak little but make their points well and move on, others listen...They usually don't speak much at all, they don't have a need.

You are a copycat who seems intent on winning a silly arguments rather than making money. Arguments don't make you money but they can make a fool out of you.

Welsh F, Crypto needs regulation. It will be good for the market.

So many voices.. All appear to be talking to themselves. No one is listening. Just a mash up of noise.

Reminds of an old song!

The actors and jesters are here
The stage is in darkness and clear
For raising the curtain
And no-one's quite certain whose play it is

Still posting b0llox and quoting the oracle that is the Motley Fool! Is this what you base your investments/speculations on?

Pottersfield. It's a way of getting attention as he has none in real life. He's just another troll!

The answer is...

'The rule is simple: if you know privileged information about a company, you can only deal in its shares when that information becomes public.'

Which we already knew.

Hope.

You said that a director buying now would mean there is no news coming. I challenged that and gave you an example. The fact that it was outside the closed period proves that directors can buy before news, just not in a closed period. Either of those situations means that news can flow. If you cannot see that that dismantles what you originally said thats fine, up to you. Its your head, not mine.

Let's return to your point. You suggested that a director buying now means there is no news. I showed you an example of where Gervaise did buy. The news flow was in full...flow, having said that he was outside closed periods when he did buy. That flow was every 6 weeks.

Like it was when Gervaise bought shares in the March 2020 low you mean?

RTC, perhaps you missed the bit about the funds we had at the time of SDs appointment and what was needed in respect of the Capex required and ultimately moving our company forwards.

Daveri , awww bless...

#StillBitter

The question is, why would a buy show as a sell?

Noise, distraction and trolling, it's a bit sad actually. I am not sure if i feel sorry for them or not. I mean, there is ignorance, a lack of self awareness and unwillingness to DYOR as demonstrated yesterday.

Costa Mooney has been posting GCAT charts (Twitter) for a few months and called a top on the 15th December. Some interesting analysis. He has just posted another suggesting a continuation/further fall is possible down to the 0.25p.

Thoughts?

I do not have it, or rather am not responsible for finding it so not going to take any credit nor share it as its not mine to share. There is a reason some add DYOR.

I much prefer to teach a man to fish and you have to help yourself first.

Anyway, you will decide what you are and are not interested.Shame, as you'd be far more clued up than you pretend to be. At least i now know to breeze past your posts as others suggest. GL.

Cule,

You could do a bit of work yourself and have a dig around, a look in the right places instead of wanting to be spoon fed. I offered you a means to that... a start point but you wanted it brought to you here. You'll never find the info because you do not look for it.

It was covered on this site last March/April. It has been covered on the GGP chat site. I also gave you a clue in a previous post.

DYOR & GL.

Agree with most of that RTC.

Cule, its been covered by a few posters on the ggpchat site.

You certainly did not say 'recent'.

Your 4th sentence. I agree with you and didn't realise you were making that point but that maybe on my part. But, If that makes me wrong, then by default you are calling yourself wrong.

If you wish to work of a sample market that does not capture interest out side of the UK that is up to you. Good luck.

Give the short and shorting has been discussed over these many months as you ascertain why do you keep stating the obvious regarding how short positions work?

Culepepper.

Your statement about the 'only short' is plain wrong. You should know better.

As Costa pointed out in March last year (and prior) there were multiple short positions from different actors including JPM. There are other quiet and non quiet posters who will attest as such and if you took the time you'd know rather than not.

The reasons for shorting (when it opened in May 2021) were not related to DTM but obviously betting on a market drop. That event at that time was too far away. It was however, more likely related to PFS and the MCAP over-valuation at that time as well as one or two other factors. Perhaps even the unloading of a certain ex director.

I'm afraid your ADVFN short list is akin reading The Sun Newspaper to find the next Gold Discovery.

It certainly is not a 'GGP' thing. It is market 'thing'.

RTC. The Short had a massive effect.. History does not lie. And the 'known' shorts have decreased but are not 100% out it seems. If you know where to look, and you should as it was published on here by an ex poster where to look.

Who knows what happens if they apply pressure at this level. Personally i am not bothered if they do because at these levels it means holdings can be increased at massively discounted prices.