Member Info for johnchucka

Sorry Terry .Just me being Duh this should work ..johnscotladn@outlook.com

Please resend Thanks

https://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1334557#

Thanks for the replies, very much appreciated.
Terrym here is my email johnscotladn@hotmail.com

Terry etal Hope you may help . I have bought gradually over 5-6 years at a range of prices accumulating a fair lump for me . When the SP reaches a dizzy number and I choose to sell a wedge or all is their a clever way or an online calculator tool / website etc to help work out the capital gain for my tax return? Any advice welcome.. Thanks

https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1334553&page_number=2

Here is that Safestocks comment that has been taken down in case anyone is interested....

"Tim Truthful on 3rd April 2019 at 10:07 am said:
This was being sold to Bosch last year and detailed discussions took place with Cannacord as i understand it. Question is, did Bosch want fleet or did they want to use another manufacturer for fleet, was the fleet delay just a cover-up for not wanting to manufacture more units whilst the deal was being considered. VSI wanted about 20-22p to compensate them and I expect they will soon be announcing VSI have won the rights to manufacture fleet, Tim & Seb got free shares to compensate them for the lower offer, Ken thinks the price should be low and someone on the BOD wanted 30p, they are divided about the value. I think management was so sure it was being sold they didn’t have a plan b when Bosch wouldn’t raise their price to 20-22p and stuck to 14-17p…….They will announce Volvo in the next 2 months and nobody will remember them giving Paul free shares for being ****"

Phil..I know it's hard to judge but by what we were told in the recent interview, the insurance RNS, Fleet figures kindly collated by Whatif and the fancy offices that Guardian SEA are occupying in Singapore I'm coming round to the idea that Fleet is showing strong signs of benefiting from it's reappraisal and that VSI are preparing for a period of expansion.

https://www.guardiansea.com/#achievement

Simon Stent was the TRI guy in the Ryan Eustice Video I posted earlier demonstrating the eye tracking . Below are two patents, one from Simon Stent and the other from SEE. It's interesting looking at these two Patents together to try and fathom out if they are complimentary and possibly part of the same system.

TRI Simon Stent Patent

METHODS AND SYSTEMS PROVIDING AN INTELLIGENT CAMERA SYSTEM

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=2019043327A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20190207&DB=&locale=en_EP#

SEE Patent

SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CAPTURING TRUE GAZE POSITION DATA

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=WO&NR=2018170538A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20180927&DB=&locale=en_EP#

Eye tracking detail from 41.40.

AI Guarding the Human: Toyota's Guardian Approach to Automated Driving

Ryan Eustice, Senior Vice President of Automated Driving at the Toyota Research Institute and Professor in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering as well as Core Faculty in Robotics at the University of Michigan, presents "AI Guarding the Human: Toyota's Guardian Approach to Automated Driving."

This is part of the Control Seminar series sponsored by Electrical and Computer Engineering at U-M, Bosch, Ford, and Toyota.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=23&v=QnUHg3ZpVWU

ET, SP aside, how do SEYE compete with SEE advantage on Data gathered from fleet going forward. We know that simulation only helps so much but real cases and Edge case Data will be crucial for Safety. The SEE Data and the Human Factors team in my mind give SEE a big lead . How can SEYE compete as SEE data compounds and their sophistication/technological lead widens?

ET, SP aside, how do SEYE compete with SEE advantage on Data gathered from fleet going forward. We know that simulation only helps so much but real cases and Edge case Data will be crucial for Safety. The SEE Data and the Human Factors team in my mind give SEE a big lead . How can SEYE compete as SEE data compounds and their sophistication/technological lead widens?

Semicast Research@semicast_res

Solution is to site the camera in the instrument cluster & use a better sunlight filter (better sunglasses, if you like). This is all about the ‘optical path’ & is as important as processor & algorithms in terms of system reliability. I estimate Super Cruise is a 2014 design.

Being a Glass half full Dreamer I enjoy finding that Ola Bostrom VP Research @ Veoneer posts the CNBS article Below . It's a bonus to learn that Torc also have CAT as Partners.

Daimler buys Torc Robotics stake for self-driving trucks

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/29/daimler-targets-autonomous-truck-market-with-stake-in-robotics-firm.html

https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/technology/daimler-buys-torc-robotics-stake-for-self-driving-trucks/68639113

Torc Robotics and CAT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKBsO5jjUw8

Not sure if previously posted.. FYI

https://www.guardiansea.com/#achievement

http://www.mcve.com.my/exhibit/exhibitors

Plus Daimler looking to spend $500m over next decade on the development of Autonomous trucks and use VOC in PR. I know many do use VOC but SEE do like to give clues when in a NDA (GM) and being a cup half full sort of investor I'm adding it to the clue pile.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=truck+voice+of+customer&view=detail&mid=B95A53616F5CD605BBA2B95A53616F5CD605BBA2&FORM=VIRE

Semicast Research@semicast_res

Excellent writing from @drgitlin A serious discussion of the role camera DMS plays in safety that goes beyond accusations of “nanny tech”. If OEMs get this right, drivers won’t even be aware of the new system anyway. It’ll just silently save lives.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/03/in-1959-volvo-gave-us-the-seat-belt-heres-what-its-safety-team-is-building-now/

The War to Remotely Control Self-Driving Cars Heats Up

'Papadopol and her team are also thinking about how a teleoperation system would work on a logistical level. They’re developing training and certification regimes for remote drivers, even though California’s law only requires they have a valid license. They’re studying how long someone can stay engaged, considering that even drivers inside their cars are no good at paying attention. “You’re not there. It’s like driving deaf,” Papadopol says. “Even though it feels like it’s a game, it’s not. Because you’re driving on public roads. You’re driving with passengers, with pedestrians around you. There’s cars taking over on the left and on the right. It’s a pretty challenging task.”

https://www.wired.com/story/designated-driver-teleoperations-self-driving-cars/

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/features/moving-up-a-gear/5068999.article