Member Info for Jimzi

CC have only half the amount -

1706 usually derivative balancing trades - very common when provider has to buy more than he holds

DCH - I'm referring to the daily trader profit - you should read in full before jumping in

Well Mike - this is where it gets more interesting - no yawning at the back Master Fox.
If an A trade [which luckily we don't have] you have to sue the DMA]
Here, I'm guessing that the ultimate holder who doesn't have his stock looks to his broker who in turn looks to the mm who will have to buy and deliver. [and the mm claims against the administrator]
Somewhere in the LSE rules it will cover this - feel free to research.

Running commentary LMAO!

Take the 175k trade yesterday.
Trading going well, slap a 175k sell in to halt it [mms know its a 5% trading stock], peeps then think oh its turning, sell and keep a lid. Give poor prices for smaller quantities & so on.
When the 175k is cancelled, everyone has forgotton about it [apart from eagle eyed Mike] - so the sell never existed - a correction trade ok - but total deletion? How do accidently get a phantom trade wrong?
UT for 654 shares causes opening drop of 2%.
All cumulative little things designed to portray weakness.

Thats why I do large dummies - and they rose yesterday when we were pupportedly down 4%

A potted version.
Naughty peeps start to sell shares they haven't got on July 15. They have a max of 20 working days to get the shares to hand over.
WSG issue them to SVS London office but at the same time the FCA are sniffing around and telling them to stop what they are doing and walk away from their desks [like Masterchef] - and then the office is closed with administration.
The question is did they hand over the shares to the market before or after total lock down or have they defaulted on delivery to the market?

For example, we open 2pc down when in reality we are flat ( the poxy UT yesterday gives false closing price)

As well, if you need to cover a short position, you want the price as cheap as possible so you try and shake. Problem is with news due and it being lower than the placing price, it’s not easy. Especially if peeps can see what’s happening. Hence the shenanigans yesterday- just indicative evidence but so far points to one thing.

Cast your mind back to the last placing with an investor known to the Bod )or indeed any of the Darwin episodes.)
After the investor had forward sold, a trade for 75pc of the total shares issued was reported - the timing (post admission) was the delivery of the forward shares being satisfied by the issue and the investor kept 25pc.
My point here is that we have yet to see a trade for 10m to balance the market. There is still a bit of time to go but not much.
It’s different cause where the shares were being issued to has gone tits up and SVS and client accounts are locked. Was delivery made before the FCA ordered the shut down last Friday - shares issued around the same time
The whole stock market relies on delivery of sold stock - if it ain’t delivered, someone has to take action to remedy such non delivery and become a creditor of SVS

That’s why it’s fascinating- it’s all down to the timing and sequence of usually innocuous events. The big balancing delivery trade or absence thereof is how we can assess what happened. And non delivery is excellent news for us ( and even SVS clients if net account balance under 85k)

Ohh goody. A useless sized UT to add to the mire. This is going to get interesting.

One of tricks of their trade. Illusion. These sale deletions are another piece of the jigsaw. It’s not even the wrong price - it’s a total deletion, never happened trade. Makes it look weak at time of original deal.
The whole book is out for smallish trades - large dummy buys skewed quite bit to the buy side (2 over 1)
Tell ya, somethings up in the state of Denmark - Shakespeare btw.

At least you get it Mike!

you clearly are happy as an owner to have no clue what is happening with Flu for over 1 year. An update, even if discussion are going well blah blah would be better because with the implications that funding is proving difficult along with Woody [who seems to be being battered senseless with BUR today] doesn't make you feel brilliant.
The only saving grace is the sp is so low, doubt it can go much lower but that's hardly a ringing endorsement of an investment case is it?
I am not - the bloody P3 trials could have been done by now.

ask back up on nothing - this is fun

MMMh - we are at T+18 from the start of the likely forward selling which could point to Friday being d-day if the shorted shares are stuck with the court appointed administrators.

Dropping the ask around 10.30 on no apparent sells does look like lets try a shake for my exposed masters . 5.3% drop on todays trading is weigh over the top and their using NT to guide and super sensitive on small trades. If no delayed sell around 1030, its all looking nice and dodgy.
Whole thing could be a fascinating 2 day game of chess.

Current anatomy of the trader.
1627 sold 29,751 at 10.01
0856 bought 29,841 at 9.94
Decided to get back in cause pattern has changed - got another 90 shares though.
Anyone claim these?

You can tell the real agenderartum. If you don’t think a Rns is coming tomorrow, which day do you ? - there must be some process to determine it’s not tomorrow so you must have a day in mind when it does - otherwise your thought is guess based on nothing - it’s babble - ergo what’s the point of posting. ?
Some crap posted on these bbs

No one knows so we have to wait- very simple - not tomorrow has no more weight as 13.45 on Thursday.
I sense fomo kicking in but some bluff trading in the interim. But is supply getting tighter?
One thing, many peeps watching this like hawks. And why?
Let the games begin. Well they have already

Kin’ell. From one post to 33 in less than a day. Yet not one post here for 10 years. Why today?

Yep. High risk tightly funded Aim shares always drift when news is dearth. However,
1. no one knows when news will land. Sellers and buyers are gambling as to when hence causing wild sentiment swings even before Cc and SVS
2. Recurring revenue contracts are the way to remove the tight funding downward sp pressure. That’s what the bod have been trying to do for years.
Once this lands, the release of the future potential will be understood very sharply - because with 20 yr profitable contracts secured, it’s a new company. It’s on the cusp - whether you believe the revamped bod and their eventual aim will happen, that’s your investment decision.

Quite how many shares in 2010 were in circ has any bearing on the mcap 10 years later shows that analytical prowess of an amoeba.
Anyway, welcome with your first posts after 10 years of zip - clearly your s team player

Interesting. Being admitted doesn’t mean delivered to the market. Now RNS was dated 5th. But doesn’t say when admitted. If WSG signed off the transfer whilst SVS and clients had ceased trading then yes, can’t deliver the forwards.
Doubt this is the case but hey, those crooks were ****y so who knows. Certainly be poetic justice

A good eg of value disconnect is QFI - see Lionels post of 1341 today. Mcap 35m
Markets are very often wrong - thats why they are volatile. Don't get me started on binary or less oilies - flick a coin.