Member Info for JGoater

9:21 Its weird there, two people just post all the time. Simples. Be careful. Are they just bots, it would take some time of day to keep posting so often.

And look out of the window towards the site: https://weathercams.faa.gov/map/-149.49492,69.87792,-145.41624,70.51252/cameraSite/13/details/camera/11668/loop-full

There was a guy years ago who posted very negatively here, Nitron or Norton or Norman. Anyway, whenever he posted a really dirty dig at the company, it took off. The best one was when we were at 10.? p and he said it was going to 5p.

It really does depend on an actual result now and I think there may be some confusion as the first thing to be pumped back will be water, followed by oil. Again surprised that potential success has not been factored in...

if its any help- THIS IS GOING TO 1p.

I agree, there is a disconnect at the moment, if we rewind in the most simplistic terms:

We rose to over 70p anticipating Megrez results

dropped to the low 50s upon tariff news, which we never got refunded :->

had terrible Megrez results

abandoned the well when the last areas were meant to be the most likely to find oil...

Sat in the 20s,

had good news rose into the 30s, had a placing

had good news and are still in the 20s.

I always think of this as to where we are heading and what happens on the way.

When the company produces oil at the expected rate, the share price should be around £2.80

We will be funded on the oil front by the gas. As we can see, the whole gas thing is full steam ahead.

So this well either leads us to being funded and producing oil, or does not. The thrill of a new well bought us to 73p, where this bigger deal, affecting the overall progress of the next 5 years has not been priced in. The importance of this is more than Megrez, so to flow oil and gas, we should be over £1, heading towards that future goal, probably mid 2028. Sitting down here in the mid 20s with a result not priced in at all means that one day you will wake up with a high price. Its not nice, I would rather rise up and then decide what the risk is. This is rather binary- do you think its going to fail- 15p, or succeed 70p - 1.20?

Yes, regarding the trades, as posted twice on Friday, the figures shown on LSE are not correct. there were huge sells preceeding the talk which dwarfed the buys. So again, look at London stock exchange website. Therer were many sells, followed by many sells with few and smaller buys in between and the share price went down.

11.07 "Exactly Swervington. More than twice the buys to sells and it is down. This is legalised bad practice. It isn't right. "

Look at the London stock exchange site and turn the volumes on so you can see the red, switch to 1 day on the time line. Its stuffed full of them, on there it doesnt appear to be buys, its sells.

The LSE website here is estimating them from the values it picks up.

I am not commenting on the share price here, just on where the information is from that has mislead you.

Looking for instance at the sells before 10.11- there are 5 sells all above 2 million. There are no buys above 600k in that area.

It was probably the large* sells dropping the share price.

*large as in many times larger than the buys- See London Stock exchange for details.

They didnt announce the start last time I dont think.

In fact, last time it was very hard to pin down the start point. They mentioned several timescales around when they might start, so the estimate we now have is about as good as it should get. In a weeks time you need to have made your mind up whether to be in or out as some results may be announced on Monday the 13th.

00.29

Water cuts 90%. Could you explain further what this means?

Is that 90% of the 100 barrels per day?

"ranged from more than 100 barrels of oil per day ("bopd") to 30 bopd (averaging 45 bopd over the 5 days during which oil was recovered). Water cuts were 90% initially but declined over time as a larger share of the frac fluids was recovered"

20.51

Despite the volitility of AIM, the change over wont mean a sudden jump.

A good example of this would be GGP. While going well pretty much all year, going onto the Australian listing has not steadied the price at all. Also exchange rates and the US dollar come into play.

"o Tralisa's Performance Based Options: (i) 50% are subject to achieving FID for the Ahpun Project by 31 December 2028; and (ii) 50% are subject to securing a listing on a senior U.S. exchange by 31 July 2026"

12:20 - one of the new employees has a bonus linked to this. Will need a bit of a dig through the RNS to find, but it gives and idea of what they hoping for.

Qube doing that is pretty good news for us who have watched this for a long time. They usually pick a pretty poor moment to do this and are out quickly.

Pretty sure they got the last one or two shorts wrong.

So this current flow test is in an area previously tested.

(i) How far away was that?

(ii) What were the results back then.

(iii) Please can somebody compare those results or explain what they mean in real terms please?

(iv) Having explained that, what would be reasonable to expect from this flow test.

Thanks in advance.

Lots of sells and fewer buys at a reasonable volume doesnt suggest any funny business or manipulation.

If you google London stock exchange Pantheon resources, set the timeline to 1 day and load up volumes it shows the share price responding to the volumes of sales.

Double checking that against the buys and sells on this page we can see 800k sales and 165k buys.

Reading the board often suggests that a sweaty slightly overweight man sits fiddling around on a computer whilst his friends who are thoroughly intersted in the stock ask him to raise and lower the share price... which he does. He makes crazy decisions and isnt just an algorithm reating to buys and sells.

Yes, this is quite different to when it was shooting up before. In the past, big news created a large jump, but if you were looking at the buys and sells, the sells would far ourweigh the buys. This time, the news came and earlier this morning the rise was supported by further buys.

There are different levels of outcome-

(i) New oil in previously untested zones (x2).

(ii) Does the oil flow, at what rate?

(iii) How about the gas?

Apart from things that happen on Tuesday, an RNS would have to come out first?

The basic projection for Pantheon is heading towards oil production. The gas part will heavily fund that, if not then a long drawn out saga with many rounds of funding are on the cards.

You mentioned yourself, did you forget which account you were using?

"Be very careful cricket81 klein will not allow anyone to post any messages that he does not agree with he has had a go at david777 also piedpiper also jungmana also none stop at brewster who he is obsessed with he is a very sick person do not post anything he does not agree with"

..buys almost caught up with the sells, which were earlier way behind.

At what stage *might this drill release a flare at?

Looking at deadhorse South cam, a new light has been there for almost 3 hours. Not quite the same as the highway lights. Not sure if we would see a flare from Deadhorse south cams. I look at this every day for some reason, fascinated to see if it changes.

Also I notice the buys almost