Member Info for Jerryspaniel

Chapeau to Shaun. He is doing what he said he would +33%. Really cant ask any more of a CEO and of course his excellent team.

Would love to see the Van Eck US team fired now, then Christmas will have come very early.

Never seen so many green lines. Many thanks to LSE for this facility. Certainly speeds up my mornings reading.

A company’s share price only goes up when there are more buyers than sellers. A listing (ASX) that allows for more buyers (eg the Aussie Super etc), will create and opportunity for buying to outnumber selling. So the price should rise. Institutions are way better holders than fickle PIs, being more long term and more rational.

Of course great management and great profitability are also needed too.

So I welcome a cross listing, in fact I see it as one of the more important catalysts to 2025.

So no bidders at all then Addicknt? Cos no one would bid 20+ when shares are 7p. Oh well, in the very back of the bottom drawer for 25.

HNY everyone.

I have been reading and listening to a lot of so called experts giving their opinions for next year. One regular theme seems to be that single asset developers and producers will do well in 25, and be take over candidates .

10p bid incoming?..

SB, whether or not gdxj are required to own the shares in the index in their correct weights or not is somewhat moot, as they are required to track the index. The best way to track that same index is to own the correct amount of shares of the companies in that index.

Not quite sure what your point is here. You clearly know a bit about the workings of the market but seem to have a different agenda to most.

The past behaviour of Van Eck is to be completely price insensitive to their actions, and their actions in the past have triggered large, possibly unjustified, price movements. Given the recent massive increase in shares in issue any share buying is unlikely to trigger the same sort of price movement, so that would suggest that Van Eck should be more likely, not less likely, to want to trade Ggp than they had in the past.

So I find your posts illogical and don’t stand up to any analysis or rational thought.

But of course you are entitled to even the most bizarre opinions as am I entitled to call them out.

Smickster, it’s a great club to be in. Lady Braggert will now be filtering him now that she has found out that she has a higher average than his Lordship. He clearly stiffed her with all his worst trades….

Evening SB. I don’t disagree with your post in theory but I do question where Van Eck would find a suitable hedge for Ggp. In a junior miners index where so much risk is stock specific, it might be possible to hedge out the commodity risk but where would you find a hedge for the Telfer, Havieron development and production risk etc etc?

Also if this was the sort of risk management that Van Eck were engaged in why have they perfectly matched their index allocation in every one of the other constituents?

So in this case I don’t think your explanation is very likely.

Great work MF. If Van Eck haven’t bought the 150m odd shares as at last Fridays close, it means that the ETF is short. This is an opportunity for the mkt makers, HFs and short term traders to squeeze Van Eck in a very thin Christmas market. This is a nasty position for them to be in and underscores my contempt for that organisation.

If they have bought the shares, then they have mislead the market by not reporting the purchases, and in some ways is more damaging for their reputation.

Oh no it isn’t.

123, you don’t know Callum, almost certainly have never met him, nor communicated with him. You don’t know what he is doing, nor what his holding is or his current views.

You just make everything up. Best if everyone just ignores you and follows Redirons example.

Lee you will have to learn to speak Australian! When Shaun says the March qtr he means the first qtr. etc. Asit it what I say, it’s potentially sooner than you think not later.

Lee, it’s not in March and June but the March and June quarters, which to us in the uk, means the first and second quarters.

I am in the Caribbean for the festive season so am not following what Van Eck are up to, though it appears they either bought early at over 7p or they are way short of what they needed to buy last night on the close. Either way they are not doing what they should be and are probably in breach of their mandate to replicate the index for gdxj. I sold out of gdxj many years ago when I realised that they were an incompetent organisation who shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near index tracking etfs. But Just my opinion!

I tend to agree with those that believe that AIM is no longer appropriate for ggp, and time to move to a main listing, preferably before ASX.

Well the main thing for me was that Shaun has started talking about how the higher gold price will start to impact the mine plan and the potential to access more areas that had marginal grades that are no longer marginal.

Telfer is going to be a lot bigger than most analysts realise.

The Army?

Good rumours dont usually come with simple spelling mistakes.....

Spades, they can’t all be buys as someone would have to sell them to the purchaser….market makers have small, strict position limits and I doubt any would be more than 1m either way.

Let’s raise 50m for exploration……who will pay more than 3-4p?

Alternatively let’s sell cascabel for 20p and use the funds to explore?

Not sure either would get my vote.

I would be amazed, and very disappointed in Shaun, if he got sucked into this blatant ramping by Mason at AZY. Pretty sure he is much smarter than that and he knows the game that Mason is playing. We own 8.6% of AZY and the only processor, which gives us an each way bet for zero outlay. AZY needs to drill something to create value. IMO

RK, my guess is that everyone except BHP (not Newmont) supported Mathers re-election. I very much doubt whether Newmont would go out on a limb on this, and we know that BHP cant stand Mather.

I am dealing with the reality. You are in fantasy land (172p this year.....)