I wonder whether the end game is closer than we all think and a flurry of rns’s will follow in quick succession this week. I like to stay positive as best as possible and really no one actually knows for sure anyway.......so easier to be positive about it!
Has anyone asked here why we get an rns today when the replies were sent last Tuesday. Surely it’s price sensitive information? I thought such things had to be released as soon as possible after the event or is that not the case? Please only genuine replies of fact rather than just ch bashers! Thanks
I would say ramp or deramp, whatever floats your boat, but tell everyone if you’re currently holding, what price and when bought - then no one can ever complain about what other people post. If people have something to hide, generally speaking they won’t be forthcoming with this info.
Yes don’t disagree with you. I just can’t reconcile the motivation of the negative stance with any benefit to him at all. Therefore at this stage it feels like the best he could reasonably do to try and get any parties moving in the right direction- albeit in the immediate short term it’s a hammered sp
What I’m struggling to understand is the overtly negative sentiment throughout most but not all of the rns. The negative stance wasn’t particularly necessary and so drives me to think there is something behind the motivation of drafting the rns in this fashion. Ch is an educated man whatever anyone says and so I can’t believe the wording was drafted without serious consideration. All imho
Unless I misheard, Colin said there are a few companies interested even without the permit. So imo it sounds like he’s holding out for the permits so that we get a better price, but if not then at least someone will have us, albeit at a much lower value.