Ignore the Noise20 Jun 2019 09:25
Theres a lot of it. But yes, there are questions too - bear in mind we shouldnt look from when we became a shell but instead look from the appointment of Syms (hence my posts yesterday about how a simple RNS could possibly put a lot of things to bed)
What we still know is that the main man is still here and that he hasnt recently been buying, suggesting that talks are in play.
We know that there are a number of possible co's.
We know that he took part in the OO and increased his stake on the open market.
Now, I could be a bit off on this but my loose interpretation is that because Antos holds over 10 percent and as we suspect it may be a firm that he has substantial control of, there needs to be a review on the subject of a related party transaction. That review needs to establish if for BOU and it's shareholders, if a deal is fair and part of that deal may establish a lock in for Antos of some sort. This adds to the complexity of an RTO, something that is already complex.
Add to that the time it takes for paperwork to go between various legal people and then to agree to amendments. Getting time to just sit down and talk can take a week in itself.
We can sit here all day and make inflammatory comments that help no one but what you need to ask yourself is has your case to buy here changed since you bought in? Then decide what you do based on that.