Member Info for Jace86

6 months from here.

Not mandatory. It is quite common that for an AGM a lot of holders usually don't vote. You shouldn't miss anything.

Good luck to all in here. I hope it works out!

Im going but what info anyone gets (it's Thursday the Agm) may be limited by a NDA.

For anything with HL it's normally the case that they never send AGM notes. Corporate actions usually only come for bigger things like name changes or open offers.

Always send a secure message to the corporate actions team and title it with the full name of the company (not just the ticker). Then make it clear for what date the meeting is and your voting/attendance instructions.

At this late stage in the game BluTony may be right here....

It's a U-turn from me. I believe the process here will require multiple signatures one of which will need to be ML's. For now he may need to stay.

Contact your brokers if you can or if you are making an attendance on the day then feel free to change it there and then if needs be.

Aim is a bit different Reece - 6 months and off you go completely after the initial 6 months of open play.

ABAL failed to appoint anyone new or have any significant shareholder take an active lead in progressing the RTO.

6 months is good enough but here remember before the company was voted rule 15 things already started moving...

Given many have been here since March/April Bermondsey, the stability shows that money is already in pre AGM. I'll be there on Thursday. Wouldn't get a squeaky bum just yet.

1-3p certainly isn't unreasonable when you look at a longer term view.

Shorter term 0.4-0.6 wouldn't be unreasonable either.

Tra1 - well put. Imagine the people kicking themselves after a bag or two.

Rushing to sell will be a complete error. Especially if something making revenue walks straight through the door!

My thoughts too Cymru

Enjoy Jimmy!!

Haha - phew! Thought you was going to turn into the next troll for a second...

I'm going to the AGM next week so hope to see a few faces there that might post here regularly.

Let's keep it. We are rolling up to the AGM. So a few thoughts rattling about in my mind that I'd like to post here.

We suspect that a RTO of some sort is about to occur here and we are (likely) to give 25 percent authority of the current shares in issue.

My suspicion, is that this will go to one sticky holder or a group. Perhaps those bringing their business here.

For all intents and purposes, that will make any kind of price irrelevant.

For like the subject heading, focus and attention should then be what's coming in. By allowing that 25 percent (now think if you was bringing a company here), you'd want to keep control of it but at the same time, during the reverse, you would be able to transfer your wealth/ownership from a company into physical stock that you hold on a listed entity. There are many reasons why this would be beneficial.

For us, that might warrant that one's risks have been mitigated and that any equity raise/exchange can be done without harming them and existing equity here... (you get more of the incoming by giving less away as there's no need to given the holding)

If it was for any other purpose, the authority might have been for substantially more...

You've put "strong sell" applegarth... are you feeling ok?

Neo - I think this one's for the filter ladies and gents... let's not waste any more time and energy on this one...

Ouch! Interesting to know... in that case then I've absolutely no idea on the 15 trades and why someone has put them in.

Im going. HL need to reply to me though... be phoning them later today otherwise.

Probably someone trying to get them for free. Using interactive investor I think they pay a subscription rather than commission. I've no other explanation for it.

The other one doesn't have Martin Lampshire in - have a dig on companies house. Both have PH as a broker.

Whilst we are a cash shell at the moment we are intending on not being in the very near future. Look to the future and discard the elements of the past that can take it no further.

With such future and providing authority to allot shares, would you really want this authority to fall here given how such authority has been used in the past?