RE: Note the EIA comments...22 Nov 2019 08:00
Linton thanks.
Significant part is EIA pertaining:-
Minister of Environment and Housing Romauld Ferreira told reporters yesterday that the suite of environmental legislation debated in the House yesterday ensures that numerous considerations will be given to the protection of the environment in the case of high-risk activities like oil drilling.
“We tabled in the House of Assembly and read for a second time for debate today, the environmental suite of legislation which introduces the Environmental Protection and Planning Act, which is the equivalent of our Environmental Protection Act,” Ferreira said.
“It introduces a Department of Environment Planning and Protection, which will be charged with enforcing environmental regulations and it allows for the minister to design any number of regulations into law that pertain to, for example, oil spills and the kind of oil drilling that you’re foreshadowing.
“Every single administration has seen fit to protect the environment in some way shape or form, every single administration that has been in power. So what we’re really seeing here is a bipartisan effort on the part of successive governments to protect the environment.”
When asked what conversations government has been having with BPC since it announced its goal of drilling an exploratory oil well in March, Ferreira would say only: “That’s their own internal deadline. I’m sure they’ll have reasons they arrived at. I can’t comment on that.”
BPC will still have to receive the green light on the environmental front from the government in order to begin its drilling.
And while the government has been rather mum on the issue, BPC continues to move full steam ahead, having secured enough funding last month to carry out its first exploratory well and publicly declaring every step of its process along the way.
N.B.
1) SECOND READING.
2) INTRODUCES NEW DEPT - DOEP&P - (New depts aren’t created for no reason.)
3) “BIPARTISAN EFFORT” - can’t say that unless it’s true as opposition would have a field day.
4) BPC CONVERSATIONS.”- Some distancing - can’t be seen to be complicit with the company you are regulating.
5) GOVT MUM - BPC would not be steaming ahead unless they had implied permissions.Legally BG would be massively liable.
Of course this is IMO and from a n investors perspective for what it’s worth.
GL.