Member Info for ifiknewidberich9

Was expecting a response from GEX on that Halo and Penspen announcement, big league again, Penspen boasting on its website, having delivered over

15,000 projects Globally.

Surely Penspen did their due diligence and Halo proved they can pay for their participation in such a, as they put TRANSFORMATIONAL Development.

Still waiting for more on this 29th October release by Halo and Penspen

https://oeuk.org.uk/halo-capital-and-penspen-partner-to-advance-helium-hydrogen-projects-in-australia/#:~:text=Member%20news-,Halo%20Capital%20and%20Penspen%20Partner%20to%20Advance%20Helium%20&%20Hydrogen%20Projects,in%20decarbonising%20global%20industrial%20sectors.

enspen and Halo Capital have partnered to accelerate the development of two of Australia’s most significant energy redevelopment projects – Hussar and Mt Winter – unlocking vast helium and hydrogen reserves critical to global supply chains and the transition to cleaner energy.

Hussar, located in Western Australia’s Officer Basin, and Mt Winter in the Amadeus Basin, Northern Territory, are recognised as prospects of significant national importance. With proven reserves and fresh drilling applications underway, both sites have the potential to deliver significant volumes of helium and hydrogen – gases central to medical technology, industrial processes and the decarbonisation of global energy systems.

“We are delighted to work with Halo Capital as engineering partner on this TRANSFORMATIVE DEVELOPMENT in Australia.

Mr H post, 15-20 more the ballpark they could hope for, never ever going to be in the same country let alone ballpark as revenues over many years.

Would be no point, no company would pay the revenue figure, general sales worldwide are done on reserves and regional risk, not revenues.

Last time poo was over $100 a barrel, the USA had the highest rating at $12.50 a barrel, with actual sales that occurred, ave around $8.5, the

low end that year was Syria at $2 a barrel.

Standard conversion rate with little fluctuation for many years 1 TCF = 170-180mbo

If EME where planning on selling on the back of asset progress, that's the rates they would get, not revenues based.

Higher quality Gem at Tender:  12,591

Lower quality gem: 63,091

75k in the Gem category with the 8.5k balance, also appearing to be better quality stones, if dross surely would have thrown in with the Industrials

If those 83.5K can average just $100 pct , it's a good chunk of the debt taken care of........GLA

There has been no reduction in the number of carats. On 7 May 2025, the Company announced a total parcel weight of 135,139.47, of which an aggregate of (a)36,475.26 carats were identified as gem quality by the Minerals Marketing Corporation of Zimbabwe at the time of export.

This left a total of 98,664.21 carats of industrial grade stones.

Post the cleaning method employed by Vast and as per the RNS of 17 November 2025, the total weight of industrial stones has been reduced to (b)50,993.98 carats, reclassifying (c)47,670.23 into a higher category of stone.

Therefore, the Company now has entered into tender c.126,677 carats of stones (a+b+c) it does not consider viable to add further processes of beneficiation (processing incurs an additional cost to the Company):

Breakdown of Categories

Original Weight                             135,139.47

Higher quality Gem at Tender:                  12,591.77-

Lower quality gem:                           63,091.75-

Industrial                                   50,993.98-

Balance:                                    8,461.97                                   

The balance are stones less boiling losses (which are unavoidable) which the Company considers it most appropriate to be sold in a phased manner in due course to seek to maximise revenues and the total value of the diamonds for shareholders

Todays rns and all recent, this mornings Q&A , answers, the questions being asked yesterday and a delight at the end

"no placing planned for December 2025 payment due"

https://www.investegate.co.uk/company/VAST

15

Education was obviously lost on you, in the green box ya go 🤡

Don't be a clown all your life take a day off, some of us prefer to call for the document RNA , not the dumb ass machine, still around 8 origin sources for London Market RNA's , including the exchanges own wire rns, which picks up the rest and relays adding its own one up number. eg

vast Mostly GNW

https://www.investegate.co.uk/company/VAST

Still topping up again today BUT its rising each time latest

Vast Resources PLC ORD 0.1P

Quantity 926,229 at 0.1464p

Barclays gone 3.90 v 4.20

GLA

It's a down the line deal, CP CEO, hoping to be in a position to distribute the GEX shares it is getting to its own shareholders by LATE 2026

For now its a distraction.

Why could he not see this lines like this in particular, would have been welcomed, rather than the dross in yesterdays announcement.

Post the cleaning method employed by Vast and as per the RNS of 17 November 2025, the total weight of industrial stones has been reduced to (b)50,993.98 carats, reclassifying (c)47,670.23 into a higher category of stone.

The Company has no current intention of conducting a placing to satisfy the 31 December 2025 debt repayment.

There has been no reduction in the number of carats. On 7 May 2025, the Company announced a total parcel weight of 135,139.47, of which an aggregate of (a)36,475.26 carats were identified as gem quality by the Minerals Marketing Corporation of Zimbabwe at the time of export.

This left a total of 98,664.21 carats of industrial grade stones.

Gem quality is divided into several categories that were highlighted in the 17 November 2025 announcement.

Post the cleaning method employed by Vast and as per the RNS of 17 November 2025, the total weight of industrial stones has been reduced to (b)50,993.98 carats, reclassifying (c)47,670.23 into a higher category of stone.

Therefore, the Company now has entered into tender c.126,677 carats of stones (a+b+c) it does not consider viable to add further processes of beneficiation (processing incurs an additional cost to the Company):

Breakdown of Categories:

Original Weight                             135,139.47

Higher quality Gem at Tender:                  12,591.77-

Lower quality gem:                           63,091.75-

Industrial                                   50,993.98-

Balance:                                    8,461.97                                   

The balance are stones less boiling losses (which are unavoidable) which the Company considers it most appropriate to be sold in a phased manner in due course to seek to maximise revenues

At least he responded to the questions being asked in this mornings RNA update over rns.......GLA

2) Earlier RNS announcements indicated that proceeds from the diamond parcel alone would be sufficient to fully repay the Company's secured debt. However, the RNS of 17 November 2025 suggests that additional financing arrangements will be required. At what point did the Company become aware of this shortfall, and why is this only being communicated now?

The intentions vis a vis the use of the diamond sale proceeds has remained consistent, as demonstrated in the Company's Annual Report, published on 31 October 2025, which stated: "the Company plans to repay the debts from the diamond proceeds and alternative funding measures".

Whilst it is anticipated, assuming the right sales conditions, that diamond sales alone are able to generate the financial resources sufficient to repay the Company's outstanding debt, the Company has neither relied on this being the case nor notified the market of such.

3) Given the current financial position and the RNS of 17 November, do you anticipate the need for another placing?

The Company has no current intention of conducting a placing to satisfy the 31 December 2025 debt repayment.

Additionally, anything Dimbo Algo sees outside of IT's NOW STATUS CURRENT range, also goes to the UNKNOWN

Not a hope in hell, those stats based on a 100% BEST GUESS on all TRADES printed and rehashed from the real LSE

Based on the dumbest Algorithm in the world 3rd party sites like this one, take them and ADD a BEST GUESS

All above Dimbo's Mid price = Buy (Never the case)

All below Dimbo's Mid price = Sell (Ditto)

All exactly on its Mid price, all delayed trades (as everything dimbo done by its now status) not mm black trades, dark arts or hocus pocus

CHOKES = UNKNOWN

Its as simple and tragic as that, 3rd parties trying to be helpful but FAIL MISERABLY on most shares daily.

Was in CTEA a few years back pre-consolidation , down in the 0.003 range, every single trade for 3 MONTHS, was labelled a sell, around 30 of them

my accumulation buys. If you see a colour code or buy/sell/unk, its a GUESS not a fact, making the stats generated from them worth as much as

used TP.

Only the two parties involved in any TRADE, know the TRUTH, the markets offered the modern Tech fix , to add real data at source, choose Tradition over Tech and why label, when they consider all TRADES to be both a buy and a sell

eg you the buyer via dma/broker from say a market floor trader /mm the seller, or any other combination you can come up with.

Have often bought , at/near bid price and on the other side , sold on/near and on occasion ABOVE the listed ask when a share in vogue, which Barclays likes to boast about by printing on my receipt, you saved or gained X £'s on this bargain deal.

Highest price paid since early morning........see what happens in the morning........GLA

17-Nov-25 16:00:00 1.60 3,500,000 £56.00k 🤔

If you can get them out of the pub mate first mate, otherwise, that's one huge Guinness compensation fee..........😉😉😂