Member Info for Hydro-Jen

What Jane Street did was expose a huge fraud. Not unlike what Gotham did with Quindell.

I do hope nobody bothers sending pointless questions in. They are easily (but pointlessly!) answered and take up time that could provide more pertinent information.

Top of my list would be 'when do you expect to become profitable?' If things go well then that takes care of itself in due course and a multi-year forecast at this point with so many variables is of no interest at all!

As, literally, everybody who has ever bought anything ever knows - price isn't everything. If we were in competition with Geopura for this contract - and we don't really know if we were - then it is logically of considerable concern that a competitor charging nearly four times the price was selected.

I'd imagine it isn't quite that straightforward, but hopefully we find out tomorrow or Friday.

Apart from Ade once saying he did - and he says multiple things most days that have absolutely zero credibility and make no sense anyway - there's no evidence at all that he or anyone else works for Helikon. Frankly, it's a ridiculous concept that any serious firm would actually pay people to post on here, ridiculous with a capital R.

Can't put any positive interpretation on that news

Why are you asking that? Bearing in mind that we don't have a contract anyway.

Ergo, they weren't commercial. We know that although we didn't know it then. We know the £4m income was not representative of reality at all, They were/are essentially trials - if they were genuine commercial deployments then we could reasonably have expected more orders to follow. Obviously they didn't, for reasons which became abundantly clear.

If and when we can deploy the new version and receive ongoing revenue then that is a commercial deployment, and that would be a material news development

It is a judgement call, and the advisers would naturally err on the side of caution.

Personally I would say that if the company achieved its first, and it would be the first, genuinely commercial order in two decades of operating, then I would consider that absolutely ground-breaking and material news.

Yes we've had order before:

Acciona- trial unit

Tamgo - Demo unit

Speedy - grotesquely overpriced units that had no hope at all of being commercially successful, and that we were paying ourselves for.

I've replied to this lunatic one too many times and have now blocked him. I'd suggest others do the same. His posts are just pointless and endless gibberish

It is very naive to expect otherwise BF. We know we are not really here for quick wins, in the sense that the business will suddenly be transformed.

Let's be clear here. I'm talking about the possibility of material news, that is news that is deemed to be price sensitive by the company's advisers and released as a specific regulatory announcement.

The results will always fall into that category but we know to a very high degree of certainty that there will be nothing very exciting in those.

We also know that there will be nothing in that category contained in the IM presentation in Friday - it simply isn't an appropriate forum for that. I hope and expect it to be interesting, informative and positive but it will be re direction of travel rather than real specifics.

In my book the chances of confirming, say, a full blown commercial order this week is minimal (not nil, minimal) because the company is, quite rightly, not in the habit of stage managing announcements.

Golden Cross? What a load of nonsense. The price hasn't written because of market technicals!

Not true. Interim results were published on 16 July 2025. IM presentation was on 18th

Very happy with recent developments especially as I increased my holding by close to 20% on Thursday lunchtime.

Shame I won't be able to listen live on Friday.

I'm not expecting any material news this week and the actual results on Wednesday are close to irrelevant, but I am expecting a very positive note - and that will do for now.

The RNS re the JV with ICL suggested we would see revenues from that in 'early 2026'. Not entirely clear how this fits in with that

Which were exactly my points

An interesting debate where people, me, learn things. That's what these boards are supposed to be for. I wonder if continuous running at this stage of development is likely, but obviously I don't know either way.

Maybe so - but the words 'yup to' aren't there by accident. Doesn't really matter - it's the principle rather than the fine detail that matters at this stage

Does a piece of complex kit ever run at 100% capacity all the time? Doubt it.

Any chance you could set yourself a target of getting through a day, or just an hour (little steps...) without spouting utter bilge?