Member Info for Hydro-Jen

Oh, lordy - we've got another one! he has been relentlessly positive while the share price has cratered. If all you want to listen to is positivity rather than trying to have an adult discussion then I'd withdraw my good luck message -well I would if I didn't have hundreds of thousands of shares! Listen too him all you want but he is demonstrably a fool and a liar.

Good luck, 86. I hope you have timed it right. Just remember to disregard the relentless ramping by the resident refiltered fool

I'll humour you one final time before you go back on permanent filter.

Tell me:

One thing you've ever been right about

One thing that I'm wrong about.

I'm waiting, but I don't expect anything other than baseless insults.

The assumption made by the likes of CN is twofold:

1. nothing will go wrong

2. they will deliver on every possible positive outcome

Well, neither of those things is remotely likely simply because that's not how life works! And it most certainly isn't how things ever pan out for a cutting edge the firm trying to deliver products which utterly change the landscape.

Of course, the thing is that we don't need everything to work perfectly (by which I mean commercially) but we need something to deliver and we need it to happen within the timescales that we are currently aware of.

And all the idiotic insults and half-witted (at best) accusations of shorting won't change that one iota.

I hope you are right, Matt. But there is no chance of me putting more cash in h ere even at these apparently bargain prices. I've got quite enough in already!

This is the key line from your post:

This company is punching well above its weight but this hasn't been recognised yet.

The fact is that it isn't punching at all yet. It might be one day but until there is a real commercial deal signed, sealed and delivering revenue then everything is based on hope that might happen one day. The bitterly disappointing (non) commercial history of this company is a lead weight and it has to demonstrate conclusively that it can deliver. Despite the promise of the ICL JV and the S&P500 'partner' that is yet to happen.

What are you on about now, Kitesurfer? I 've never posted anything on the ITM board, or even looked at it. And as for those who say I'm never positive, that's just nonsense - here's one example:

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=AFC&share=AFC-Energy&thread=A27B6594-C800-47C3-A784-9A98B41AD08F

What I don't do is post stupid baseless speculation and outright lies (400kg a day, Niftylift etc...)

CN/STF wrong about something? - Hold the front page!

Such wit and perspicacity. I've had you n filter for a ln time but I was a bit bored so thought I'd have a look at what gibberish you were posting and, by was I not disappointed!

You have bever been right about ANYTHING, Ever! Yet, still , you believe you are the font of all knowledge and wisdom and everyono else is 'a nugget'.

Back on filter - no point replying

The utterly and increasingly ludicrous CN must be Nick Walker, our fall on his feet Chief Strategy Officer.

Let's see

Takes everything at face value - tick

Incapable of critical analysis - tick

Can only see the sunlit uplands - tick

Can't think of any other explanation as to how anyone can see anything but positive outcomes despite getting on for two decades of disappointment. Can't be bothered trying to find a winky face emoji.

!!!!!!!!!

I've saved my exclamation marks for the text for fear of seeming like an ADHD riddled toddler. LI is generally a free tool, I presume other than free trials only recruiters ever pay Premium, for PR purposes which are often frustrated by the hopeless social media algorithms which point users to all sorts of irrelevant stuff.

I'm currently trying to promote my nascent hobby business via LinkedIn (and other channels) by pumping out material once a week to build up some awareness and contacts to get bookings for spring and summer 2026 but we'll see if it works later. It costs me nothing but hopefully builds and maintains a following who might place orders. Is this all AFC is doing? I'd think that they are fishing in a very different market to mine given I'm looking for social event bookings that might come in at about £1k in total; they certainly won't be getting orders on the back of a few posts.

We are highly unlikely to learn anything material from AFC's socials but today's effort does beg some very obvious questions.

It says the units 'were' deployed and the trial 'successfully demonstrated'... Now, unless the poster is just poor at language that suggest that the trial is over. So, why is that the case? Obviously work on the LTC is a very long way from finished so why are the units not still in use? And the trial, from AFC's perspective, has a single purpose - to generate orders. Has it? Will it? Are there yet more trials (viz the Acciona model)? This is such a long term project that there can be no reason not t place orders for deliver post the Volex reboot if they are wanted - unless the new units will need trialling again - it wouldn't be a surprise really!

You really do twist in the wind Melvin.

Vou state something as if it's fact.

It's pointed out to you that it's nothing of the sort

So you change the parameters.

There must be any number of speccy exploration companies that have done worse anyway. Try TRP as just one

That's nonsensical - there are lots of companies that have gone pop in that timescale, so they've defiintely performed worse!

Under a newly issued FCA consultation

https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/uk-regulator-to-end-public-disclosure-of-short-seller-identities-93CH-4311449

Doesn't matter I suppose, the Brains Trust on here knows who they all are...

Anyone, Aldebaran, who isn't sceptical given the history and. in particular, the last four/five years of Bond's tenure, is just in denial. However, if the (as yet unspecific) revenue predicted for 2026 does begin to flow then the credibility of Wilson will get an enormous boost and things will turn. If AFC doesn't deliver meaningful revenue next year then we'd be close to game over as funs will be needed and the price will be very, very low. At this stage I'd say 2027 is close to irrelevant but we could of course get news of progress in achieving the (again unspecific) milestones along the route with the S&P 500 partner.

If the terms of the JV have been signed and sealed, which certainly appears to be the case from the item put out there by ICL (below) it seems a little puzzling that AFC haven't made a contemporaneous announcement. Feels like it should be price sensitive (in a good way to me) although I suppose as it is out there in the public domain and the price continues to drift then perhaps not!

I don't really know why, Aldebaran, you are so fixated on 2027. The original ICL announcement said revenues from early 2026 and the reduced cost cells should be available mid 2026. Just getting commercial sales of anything for the first time in AFC's history really should be fairly transformational.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/industrial-chemicals-ltd_hydrogen-greenammonia-sustainability-activity-7386730558267183104-e1V5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAAAkyjQ0B7bMMkoLn8XD8s2HLk9vizWE-zfc

I asked a question and got a good answer - sort of what these boards are for isn't it? At no point have I ever said they weren't on site. It's not the big deal you seem to want to make it.

I didn't find it hard to establish that level of detail.

But you can post absolute gibberish about chart reversals OK. I've no agenda other than wanting this thing to make it and me some money. No comment on my post earlier about a mysterious new incorporation I see? Is that irrelevant? The only people I've called liars on here are CN (filtered, don't bother replying) and Haggis in his multiple guises That both are is demonstrably true. Why are people so scared of actual debate?

Yes, excellent. Quite why a reasonably put question has to be met with insults is a mystery but that's your problem rather than mine.

So it's not OK to ask a perfectly reasonable question re the LTX but it is OK to post some meaningless mumbo-jumbo about mystical patterns? Charts certainly have their place in analysis but much less so for a firm at AFC's status than an established commercial entity.