Member Info for HopeSo

No, Novo. Over a period of weeks I have watched them go out one by one.

Novo. Ever heard the expression 'It's no use knocking on the door if you know there's no one home'? :P

I think you're a bit hopeful, oneanonly1. We're about to find out though....standby.

Let me help you: '........Thomas Cook is still one to avoid at all costs, in my view'. Difficult to read much of a change of heart when he concludes the piece with that view. Not that I agree with him I have to say. I just feel that if we are quoting then let's quote the full story. :)

What did the final two lines say?

Is anyone going to repost the Q3 conf. call source?

This should be interesting. I think I'll just sit back and enjoy. :)

Ambly. Just so I know, how do you reduce nett debt. Possibly by having an operating profit in a subsequent accounting period? It's only a guess on my part, I'm sure you know best.

Scarlet....No, I'm just me. :) If you have a look back I have been advocating TCG as a 'strong buy' until recently when I changed to 'hold'. I see them now, as I just suggested in a reply to 'Members'., as an each way bet for survival. I have a position in TCG where I will be more than happy if they recover. If they don't then I'll get stung a bit. I'm not advocating sell, hold or buy. I just past a comment on my position. I did it all on my own too :) Don't be paranoid, those men behind you will jump up and get you. :P

I'm only in for the 'punt' , Members. It will pay for something if it's fortunes change and won't sting too much if it falls. I've not got much in it but I'm staying for the party. :)

Remember how it 'bobbed' in the water for a while, all on board didn't believe it could happen? Then it stood up on it's end and at an accelerating rate began it's final plunge.....? Just asking.

There's an awful lot of 'reds' going through.

Answer as expected. lol.

Oh yes, Gareth. Your position is quite clear, thank you. I was quite hoping you might have dealt with your apparent view that because the article referring to debt was in June, and that it's now July, it is no longer relevant. I'm certain you'll have an answer and I'll be delighted (amused) to hear it. Please don't play on words. Your assertion, very clearly, is that the article about debt , being written in June, is no longer relevant now that we are in July. I can only assume that now we've hit July the debt has been magically' accounted for and/or written off. After your explanation as to its disposal I will be quite happy to join Cloudy Mountain in trying to 'keep up'

Gareth. You may disagree with CM's views out of hand, but I, as an investor in TC, am quite interested to hear all views and comments and get a balanced picture. As for your assertion that the article is June's, not July's: Am I to assume that the debt to which the article refers is also June's, not July's? I ask this as a stock holder who is staying put. :)

As a pretty well (invested) silent observer it is increasingly apparent that there are at least a couple of contributors writing under different IDs. Amusing.

SP has tested sub 13p a few times this week and bounced. Clearly some support. :)

Thanks, chaps. I'll continue to sit on my hands. :)

Does anyone know if 900m is a realistic sum to expect from the tender sale of it's air operations?

The change in terminology by TMF this morning is old news. Just sit on your hands people, no need to panic. Whilst I certainly wouldn't be buying anymore atm I see no fundamental change to persuade me to sell, and on that basis my stance has changed from 'Strong buy' to 'Hold'