Member Info for honestbob

Thankyou - after a very trying day your reminder of that tremendous scene made me smile

now look what you have caused

You are an old rascal

Your nicely written and long post about the irrelevance of postings to the company's activities is something of a contradiction in terms

As far as I can see it does not make any points about the company itself but only about postings

Entitled to your own opinion but I think you will find company generated income -admittedly not often or from parys sites since inception

It is a high risk / high reward speculative play and if uncomfortable plenty of other places to invest

Brent your last post surely has to be a contender for the understatement of the year 2019 competition

- '' Since AYM have not been the quickest to raise finance ''

Welcome back

On a flippant note have you not noticed that the more you instruct on recommendations - the more the reverse occurs

Thank you for your very informative posts and the time you have spent putting them together - I think they are really helpful

What is puzzling me having read them is that with AYM having to find finance for various stages - what is in it for QME if they cannot raise it - their payback seems to come when the mine is operational .

Or do you that research has been undertaken to indicate that finance will be available .

I have feeling that while there may well be a spike we are not yet there

I agree with you buyer not likely to stump up 50 million for 50 million of future income . That said the board to date have appeared very conservative in all predictions etc .Even if fuutre income is heavily discounted

I seem to recall that the inferred resources conservatively are similar in volume to the known. Realistically it would be surprising if at least 50 % of them are not there as an absolute minimum .

With my limited knowledge I would have thought that once all initial infrastructure in place the cost of mining the additional inferred minerals would be appreciably less than that for the initial known resources and as such should be more cash generative . .Ie. with all fixed equipment in place and roads etc in place .

I would imagine that once extraction is in place for the known this might also give some pointers as to the quality of the predictions for the inferred . Be interesting to know if the thought of longer mine life is based on inferred or whether on greater extraction of already predicted resources .

As you have previously said we could do with that knowledgeable chap South Westerner making an appearance .

I would suggest you have a look at QME website - who are now putting a great deal of time money and energy into the project . I would be sure that they have performed very careful due diligence and by looking at their operation and their decision to invest I think you will be able to draw your own conclusion .

For detailed background information the AYM website itself is very informative .

Interestingly Anglesey are not an AIM stock but have a main listing with all the responsibilities that brings.

Interesting to note up 80 or 90 % ( ignoring spread ) on low in last 12 months.

I think the low was somewhat overdone admittedly but it is not hard to imagine creep to 3 or 4 p steadilly

That is a really good point and something our politicians would do well to think about

sorry should say losing the last election was a victory

- a world slowly going mad - confidence vote called by a man who lost his own 80 per cent to twenty per cent and ignored the result - a man who as far as I am aware has organised or run nothing of any consequence now thinks he is the man to negotiate brexit. Same man and party who seem to think that losing the last election was

Calls for another referendum - if leave again nothing gained if remain what then ? best of three

A burly blacked haired labour mp shouting in a small lady lib dems face for daring to disagree with him

Really given something of consequence that needed doing rather than spout meaningless words or vote on legislation of others our representatives have been found sadly lacking

Inability with modern technology to work out a border in Ireland where vehicles and people originating in southern Ireland waved through and proper checks on movement originating in other countries . I.e. soft or no border for southern Irish - proper border for other countries or nationalities using it as a back door .Take a little work and would not be 100 per cent effective but then no border is.

Think the underlying problem is that the majority of the British people expressed their wished ( rightly or wrongly ) in a referendum - not the way they were supposed to .

At last election MPs of all parties had opportunity to form a remain party of their own and give the remain voters a voice - they did not .Admittedly Lib Dems and I think Greens did stand under their true colours

Our so called rulers cannot by and large accept the idea that the electorate has ideas of its own and if it differs from MPs that does not mean it should be ignored.

I hear Teresa has asked bill if he can let her borrow a shovel as she needs to dig her self out of a hole

No worries - I had picked up your posting and commenting in general - like you I think there has been a vote and really that should be the end of it - but that does not appear to be the case - which is why I think a referendum simply for electorate to approve which of two available options they prefer might bring the bickering to an end and hopefully put a stop to the politicians who seem for various vested interests to want to drag the process out.

Personally I think there has been a referendum when electorate voted out an election when vast majority of MPs were elected on a leave manifesto

So another in out referendum I do not think is the answer - if it produces another out result then nothing will have changed and if produces a close remain there is likely to be an argument for a third to give a best of three.

In my opinion what is now required is a referendum to leave with Mrs Mays deal or leave with a no deal . EU could then see it would be one or the other and hopefully put their best offer on the table in the hope of exit with a deal

I find the behaviour of MPs who are doing their utmost to make it clear to EU that they will prevent a no deal naive and undermining of any negotiating stance

And that rascal Jeremy Corbyn who clearly wants A out of EU and B an election does not really help .He seems to have forgotten hat he had a no confidence vote by his own MPs and 80 % said he should go - which he ignored - so why would he expect anyone else to go if they lose one

He also seems to have forgotten that he lost the first election when he was leader of the opposition - although he appears to be under the bizarre impression by not doing as badly as predicted he won it .

I think it a bit unfair to blame those who voted leave for the present position. In fairness at the time of the referendum I cannot recall those wishing to remain putting forward the argument that a reason to stay would be the inability of the politicians to negotiate a satisfactory solutionI don't think negotiations have been helped by constant undermining of government position leading eec to suppose any crumbs would be acceptedI think now a referendum is needed - do we exit with Mrs Mays deal or do we exit with no dealThis would not then overturn the stated will of the people in the original referendum or that shown in the last election

They are rather fabulous looking things aren't they ?

Sorry QME have big red and yellow