Member Info for honestbob

AYM time lines what a delightful phrase

And you are spot on political parties have risen and fallen - presidents and prime ministers have come and gone wars have been lost and won - Brexit has started and finished and throughout Parys Mountain remains intact and imprevious

Yamr - I don't thnk it would hurt for a modest update - appreciate some areas are commercially sensitive - from directors

Mike I have bought modestly into dips

I foolishly did not sell on the highs and took profits out or aquired more - each time wondering (wrongly) if this was the time something would happen.

This despite commenting more than once that people who had done it could have done well.

If and when what i think is next significant high I intend to sell a good proportion probably half. If price continues to rise so be it if it drops then I will buy some back.

I have done this quite successfully in the
past with other shares and am mildly irritated with self that havnt here.

I remember when you bought the million - it was about the time Brent managed to make a bottle of wine disappear with a courier. If my memory serves me correct - also subject to criteria - you were going to finance a party on the Island.

Albeit Southwesterner undertook an analysis of the situation and injected some realism not long after - which put paid to that dream.

ATB bob

Apologies Mike just noticed have inadvertently basically repeated your post

A Google search on 'aym london stock exchange' will bring up various information but also quote whether the share is AIM or main market.

Although have to agree it behaves more like AIM stock

Hope this helps

Slimgizmo

It is baffling but also par for the course

There has been a pattern - some sort of development - rns - report of some type (usually later than expected) price rises - often steeply - then in absence of any developments usually slowly drifts down again - then after a while the process repeats. Can't say that this will continue indefinitely.
I hold on the hope that one day the RNS or announcement will lead to a rise which keeps going.

With hindsight I took should have sold on rises and bought back or took a profit on the following drop

What may be different this time is activities at labrador - although also as far as I tell there does remain a large parcel of shares that may put brakes on if get back to 6p
I

You are quite right and it is odd usually they are placed then rise - people who took up placing make a profit and move on. It is at the back of my mind unless they have dribbled them out that there is still (depending on whether they bought to be long term holders) potentially several million shares waiting to be sold

Brent interesting thoughts re DV although I would imagine he is a well aware of the options as anyone and given Juno investment and loan I would also think present scenario meets with his approval and quite possibly he is main architect of it or at least one of them.

Take up directors options I thought encouraging

SW thank you that is very helpful and something to reflect on

Sw thankyou for your considered and detailed explanation - it certainly hasn't been a get rich quick scheme you are right

I am mindful that the company needs either more diluting share issues or Juno to continue with loans - (both may continue or not) to remain afloat Which is why I think an income stream would be a massive comfort

I accept that more reports showing increased resources would be ideal- but in a nutshell are you saying that off the reports todate you don't consider a sale of Parys or financeable as it stands.

Although that being the case (accepting I have little knowledge on these matters) i must admit I don't understand why company has commissioned sequence of reports each pointing that there may be more inferred resources rather than commission a make or break survey.

Boom you might like peek at advn aym board too - I sometimes have a look there - for snippets - it seems to have fallen into anarchy

Apologies Brent misunderstood - I think 75 % would be for full winding up.

But resolution to instruct directors to undertake an action (ie sell an asset) only require 51 %

Apologies Brent whist 75 per cent needed to wind up I think 51 per cent (but not certain ) needed for a directors to a certain course of action

Brent I think winding up the company would need a special resolution with 75 per cent support

Stanacy
I have the impression that the directors are deal makers more than actual miners. My thoughts for what they are worth that their preferred plan was to demonstrate the value of Parys - enhanced as far as possible by reports and then sell to an actual miner. Then if their age permits move onto another project. With the fallback of if no buyer then to actually mine.

This process has been going on for a long time with large rises and falls on the share price in the period.

Whether this remains the idea now I don't know.

Has to be anyodies guess where share price go next - Labrador holding potentially can really benefit but that relies on positive developments there.
High current metal price helps sentiment.

As you say it has been going on a long gone and I suspect will continue to be an interesting and bumpy ride

A modest update on the website of press announcement might be encouraging I appreciate certain information has to be by RNS - but not everything

John Jave looked through my last few posts to try and make sure I am not fooling myself. To be honest if anything my recent concern about the potential overhang of Ten Million shares from the rights I would think is anything but ramping.

John I have to agree with you there are rampers and de rampers etc on all boards.The effect of both on price I belive to be exaggerated - but not neccesarily good for the naive.

I must admit I would put myself into neither category and surprised to be described as a ramper

I thought my postings varied between mild positive and mild negative (with occasional mild frustration) depending on the circumstances. With other postings giving my interpretation neutraly hoping to trigger debate I can learn from

As perhaps can be seen from my most recent posting below which personally I would describe as relatively neutral . I also regularly suggest people refer to the AYM website so they can make their own observations

Whilst with hindsight I should have traded on highs and lows. I didn't - I admit would like to see the price rise genuinely and sustainably on proper fundamentals.

I have seen enough misery on other boards where people have been sucked in with more than they can afford on a wave of misplaced enthusiasm to be other than careful with what I put on any board

I can only apologise if I have inadvertently come across as a ramper.

ATB

Railway man

My position very similar although not quite as long. Can't quite remember why I bought them and in early days were even odd years when i forgot I had them.

A bit like that film groundhog day and as you say there is always the elusive jam tomorrow which looking back has stayed by hand on the sell button more than once

With hindsight i should have sold on the typical four or five pence regular highs and bought back on the just as inevitable 1.5 to 2p lows. But each time there seemed to be something a little different that made me think perhaps this is the time at last.

As I hope now but not with great confidence!

I can see that directors are taking up
3.5 million share options. But there is mention of a block listing of 10 million.

Does anyone know why the difference