Member Info for HenryHistorian

@Ecclescake: I very much doubt that Pallas / Hammodi would issue such a letter without substance behind it as doing so without some evidence to back their claims would make themselves vulnerable to litigation.

I hope for a court case as this is where this should be discussed in details and statements be made under oath and with proper sanctions a possibility.

@troublesome: Correct and this is also for me the worst part - it was clear that Brian Tenner was aware of some of the conversations here in 2022 and in one presentation he addressed some of the points - in a mock sincere manner…I say mick sincere as he conveniently left out to note that his base line /low expectations were light years lower than what was mentioned on this board - mentioned based on research by Edison which was paid by Nanoco and also on very confident soundings off by Brian Tenner.
To do a fund raise at 37p when you know that you are willing to accept USD 50m as settlement just beggars belief.

@NGR: You are correct on this one. I don’t blame Brian Tenner on this - at least on this point on commercialisation he did use these qualifiers.

Nevertheless he is still soundly culpable on hyping and inflating expectations on the settlement despite already being prepared to accept a small settlement.
So in the end he was still insincere.

Thank you Feeks and Nanogeddon.
I can only think of one reason why NGR is doing all he-she can do to try to sweep the absolutely shameful and reprehensible behaviour of Mr Tenner under the table.
I do wish that there will be a proper legal and in addition FCA investigation into Nanoco/LOAM and the way investors were communicated to.
This case in my humble opinion stinks and stinks to the heavens.

@NGR: Funny so you cite the second RNS as defence….absolutely hilarious.
So utterly utterly ridiculous.
Never mind lawyers are now on the case and I guess Brian Tenner is soon toast as CEO and rightly so.
Whether criminal charges need to be laid at various individuals I leave that to lawyers.

@Inteusive: Do yourself a favour and vote this management and board out.

&NGR: What messaging are you talking about??? Until the second RNS there was no messaging at all that could have meant that USD 50m is our minimum base.
Please point me to that messaging!

@NGR: A good joke… So LOAM sold…. Surprise surprise…. Wink wink is all I can say.
Very convenient to have a long term view… I guess that would suit Brian Tenner….investors being misled and following behind the carrots that always seem to be sooooo close …oh yeah we know the spiel by now.
I will be voting Tenner out.

@NGR: You are really trying to Kidd us are you…. Brian Tenner spoke about major inflection point in value and so this is how everyone understood it.
I guess you are being paid a princely amount of money to defend him…

@Tornadotony: Thank you and your listing of past RNS wording from Brian Tenner with the share price at the time says everything.
Even wilfully blind people like NGR or Torpedo cannot have an answer to this.

@NGR: I see you wilfully continue to ignore that Brian Tenner has blatantly misled investors over months. Look at the share price of what Brian Tenner tried to sell as a transformational settlement- I mean would you expect a transformational settlement to lead to a collapse in the share price? Do you really try to tell us that this is what Brian Tenner wanted us to expect when talking about the Samsung litigation as a “major inflection point” in shareholder value?????
You are kidding me…. I suggest that you NGR sorry Brian prepare better excuses.

NGR is definitely very close to the board. Never mind bring on Hammodi/Pallas and let us jointly clean out Nanoco. Private investors have been misled for long enough and time for Tenner to go into early retirement where he cannot mislead and betray investors any longer.

Yes you are and please just because one Brian Tenner throws in some words of general caution to investors in an investor presentation does not mean he would have given ground to Samsung. Again if as the second RNS had claimed that Nanoco had given lower guidance before (where, when???) than this would not have been a problem anyway correct?

@NGR: Over several months the management, Brian Tenner, were happy with inflated/outlandish messaging. He said something like multiples of current share price in one presentation, he saw numbers of USD 509m in the press and never ever did he try to put a slight dampener on this. For me this is simply misleading and betraying shareholders and not negotiation strategy.
I will be voting him out and I can only urge others to do so as well. Brian Tenner’s unscrupulous and shameful behaviour needs to be answered with his removal.

@PJT: I did and once made noises to this regard on this shareholder board but it is only now that my premonition has been officially confirmed.
I might listen to Brian Tenner’s presentation- after all I like fairytales and Tenner is right up there with Brothers Grimm of Germany or Hans-Christian Andersen.

@peregrinetrouser: Let’s call it deliberately ambiguous as with everything from Nanoco management.
I will see what Hammodi/Pallas action will be - obviously I will support them when trying to oust the completely useless and insincere (again being friendly here) management but even so I will be looking to head eventually for the exit.

@Nanonano: Now imagine our negotiation power/backbone given the single potential (!!!) customer. I only hang around until I can vote Brian Tenner out.

FlyingHigher: Yes, the board needs sacking ASAP. Now we know that there are no imminent commercialisation deals so this should give new blood some time to settle into the roles.

@FDred: Judge Gilstrap was not the problem and as far as I know he would only look that procedurally the settlement is fine but the content was up to Nanoco and Samsung to negotiate - and what a glorious surrender this has been.

@Tornadotony: The problem is that Brian Tenner has not only made a problem around the time of the settlement but he has created and maintained misleading expectations for months leading into the settlement. This is what I find unacceptable.
The way management and board tried to spin what is a really underwhelming settlement as a success is also not acceptable and neither is the radio silence afterwards. This just shows the contempt for small shareholders.
Let us be honest here: Without the actions of Hammodi Brian Tenner and Co almost would have gotten away with it. Right now that is in doubt. - anyway his reputation is in tatters.